Clathrin-coated vesicles execute receptor-mediated endocytosis at the plasma membrane. However, a role for clathrin in later endocytic trafficking processes, such as receptor sorting and recycling or maintaining the organization of the endocytic pathway, has not been thoroughly characterized. The existence of clathrin-coated buds on endosomes suggests that clathrin might mediate later endocytic trafficking events. To investigate the function of clathrin-coated buds on endosomal membranes, endosome function and distribution were analyzed in a HeLa cell line that expresses the dominant-negative clathrin inhibitor Hub in an inducible manner. As expected, Hub expression reduced receptor-mediated endocytosis at the plasma membrane. Hub expression also induced a perinuclear aggregation of early endosome antigen 1-positive early endosomes, such that sorting and recycling endosomes were found tightly concentrated in the perinuclear region. Despite the dramatic redistribution of endosomes, Hub expression did not affect the overall kinetics of receptor sorting or recycling. These data show that clathrin function is necessary to maintain proper cellular distribution of early endosomes but does not play a prominent role in sorting and recycling events. Thus, clathrin's role on endosomal membranes is to influence organelle localization and is distinct from its role in trafficking pathways at the plasma membrane and trans-Golgi network.
Oxygen therapy (OT) is a commonly prescribed essential medicine for people of all ages in the management of hypoxia. The adverse effects of inappropriate OT supplementation may be underestimated by health professionals and lead to poor health outcomes among hospitalised patients. Knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) assessments of medical staff members to OT guidelines are essential to ensure optimal patient care.
The ‘Students as Teaching and Learning Consultants’ project aims to build student and staff dialogue about teaching and learning approaches, activities and experiences by adopting a partnership model and a collaborative ethos positioning students as active participants central to producing knowledge about how to enhance and develop teaching and learning. The project offers academic staff a qualified student perspective (at points of need) that goes beyond the end of module evaluation and national student survey data. The session will explore project findings related to how to go beyond merely “listening to students” and instead view students as “change-agents”; equal and knowledgeable partners in structuring the teaching and learning experience.
The session begins with a short introduction to the project. In the first group activity delegates work with matching cards featuring a variety of mechanisms for student consultation written on them (such as student panel, NSS) with cards that have characteristics written on them (such as anonymous, tokenistic, developmental). The groups then feedback to compare the selections made and the reasoning behind this.
In a second activity, groups are asked to use the “Diamond 9 technique” as a tool to prioritise these student consultation mechanisms according to whether they are collaborative and reflect student as active participants working in partnership with staff. The authors will introduce Arnstein’s ladder of citizen participation, and an adapted version relating to levels of student participation developed by Bovill and Bulley (2011).
The activities will enable delegates to reflect on their current models for student engagement and active participation, to discuss and explore what it means to have authentic student participation/engagement and discover ways to achieve this.
Extraneous neuroscience information improves ratings of scientific explanations, and affects mock juror decisions in many studies, but others have yielded little to no effect. To establish the magnitude of this effect, we conducted a random-effects meta-analysis using 60 experiments from 28 publications. We found a mild but highly significant effect, with substantial heterogeneity. Planned subgroup analyses revealed that within-subjects studies, where people can compare the same material with and without neuroscience, and those using text, have stronger effects than between-subjects designs, and studies using brain image stimuli. We serendipitously found that effect sizes were stronger on outcomes of evaluating satisfaction or metacomprehension, compared with jury verdicts or assessments of convincingness. In conclusion, there is more than one type of neuroscience explanations effect. Irrelevant neuroscience does have a seductive allure, especially on self-appraised satisfaction and understanding, and when presented as text.
ABSTRACT Since 1991 clinical audit has become an essential part of Health Service practice with local funding for projects in the United Kingdom. The process seems to be very similar to action research as it is based upon ‘the systematic peer evaluation of the quality of patient care’. This paper sets out to compare and contrast terms used in health and education to explore similarities that may provide opportunities for multiprofessional dialogue.