Background: Serial casting is favored for the initial treatment of early onset scoliosis (EOS), but there is concern about significant morbidity and caregiver burden. Studies have examined the utility of bracing as an alternative to casting, but little is known about differences in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between treatments. We hypothesized that patients with a diagnosis of idiopathic EOS experience an improvement in HRQoL when transitioning from serial casting to bracing as measured by the 24-Item Early Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ). Methods: Subjects with idiopathic EOS were retrospectively identified from a multicenter database. EOSQ scores were compared before treatment, after index casting, after transition out of cast to brace, and at the most recent follow-up. Available major curve magnitudes were also compared during these time points. Data were compared using repeated-measures ANOVA with post hoc Bonferroni correction. Results: Sixty-six subjects met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-seven (56%) subjects were male and the average age at the time of index treatment was 1.9 (0.37-6.4) years. The average follow-up was 3.2 (0.90-6.8) years. In 57 subjects, the major curve magnitude improved from a mean of 33 (CI 28-37) degrees before treatment initiation to 27 (CI 23-30) degrees after casting and to 24 (CI 20-29) degrees at the most recent follow-up. The HRQoL subdomain showed a significant decrease in HRQoL during casting treatment 75.7 (CI 72.9-78.5) from pre-index treatment 84.9 (CI 81.4-88.5), during brace treatment 84.8 (CI 81.8-88.0) and at most recent follow-up 87.0 (CI 83.6-90.3) ( P <0.001). The parental impact subdomain improved from the beginning to the end of treatment (77.7 to 87.7, P =0.001) (n=64). Satisfaction improved from casting to bracing (73.4 to 86.7, P <0.001) (n=63) and to the most recent follow-up (73.4 to 87.9, P <0.001). Conclusion: Patients treated with casting for EOS experience reversible declines in HRQoL. After patients transition from casting to bracing, EOSQ scores recover to pretreatment baseline levels and are maintained at follow-up. This information must be balanced with the effectiveness of treatment for EOS with either method and customized for each patient. Level of Evidence: Level III—retrospective comparative study.
Given the importance of the spine in carrying out daily movements, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) can significantly limit the range of motion (ROM). Severe forms of AIS are treated surgically, most commonly with posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation, which may also reduce spine ROM. This review is the first to describe the literature on total spine ROM in patients with AIS before and after corrective surgery. A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar to identify articles reporting global spine ROM in AIS patients. Following the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), 486 articles were initially identified. Two independent reviewers (YM and JH) assessed eligibility for inclusion. A total of 11 articles fit the inclusion criteria. AIS in untreated patients seems to limit axial and coronal plane ROM based on the degree of curve severity, with more severe curves having less ROM. More research comparing total spine ROM in untreated AIS patients to that of healthy controls is needed. In those undergoing spinal fusions, the lowest instrumented vertebra and surgical approach appear to minimize further reductions in ROM; however, the findings are mixed. Vertebral body tethering (VBT) shows promising preliminary results in treating AIS while preserving motion; however, long-term outcomes have yet to be assessed for this novel procedure. The results of this systematic review suggest that further research is required before treatment strategies can be modified for surgically treating patients with AIS to take into account the effects of treatment on changes in spine mobility.
Case: A 9-year-old girl developed a physeal bar after flexible nailing for a proximal radius fracture. The patient presented 2 years after initial injury with gross deformity of the wrist with confirmed physeal bar. The patient underwent physeal bar resection, cement interposition, and corrective osteotomy with improvement of radial height, wrist deformity, and function. Conclusion: This case illustrates the importance of meticulous flexible nail insertion technique and the subsequent, successful treatment for the complication.
