Lung transplantation and related medications are associated with pathobiological changes that can induce frailty, a state of decreased physiological reserve. Causes of persistent or emergent frailty after lung transplantation, and whether such transplant-related frailty is associated with key outcomes, are unknown.Frailty and health-related quality of life (HRQL) were prospectively measured repeatedly for up to 3 years after lung transplantation. Frailty, quantified by the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), was tested as a time-dependent binary and continuous predictor. The association of transplant-related frailty with HRQL and mortality was evaluated using mixed effects and Cox regression models, respectively, adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity, diagnosis, and for body mass index and lung function as time-dependent covariates. We tested the association between measures of body composition, malnutrition, renal dysfunction and immunosuppressants on the development of frailty using mixed effects models with time-dependent predictors and lagged frailty outcomes.Among 259 adults (56% male; mean age 55.9±12.3 years), transplant-related frailty was associated with lower HRQL. Frailty was also associated with a 2.5-fold higher mortality risk (HR 2.51; 95% CI 1.21 to 5.23). Further, each 1-point worsening in SPPB was associated, on average, with a 13% higher mortality risk (HR 1.13; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.23). Secondarily, we found that sarcopenia, underweight and obesity, malnutrition, and renal dysfunction were associated with the development of frailty after transplant.Transplant-related frailty is associated with lower HRQL and higher mortality in lung recipients. Abnormal body composition, malnutrition and renal dysfunction may contribute to the development of frailty after transplant. Confirming the role of these potential contributors and developing interventions to mitigate frailty may improve lung transplant success.
Lung transplantation in mechanically ventilated (MV) patients has been associated with decreased posttransplant survival. Under the Lung Allocation Score (LAS) system, patients at greatest risk of death on the waiting list, particularly those requiring MV, are prioritized for lung allocation. We evaluated whether pretransplant MV is associated with poorer posttransplant survival in the LAS era. Using a national registry, we analyzed all adults undergoing lung transplantation in the United States from 2005 to 2010. Propensity scoring identified nonventilated matched referents for 419 subjects requiring MV at the time of transplantation. Survival was evaluated using Kaplan–Meier methods. Risk of death was estimated by hazard ratios employing time-dependent covariates. We found that pretransplant MV was associated with decreased overall survival after lung transplantation. In the first 6 months posttransplant, ventilated subjects had a twofold higher risk of death compared to nonventilated subjects. However, after 6 months posttransplant, survival did not differ by MV status. We also found that pretransplant MV was not associated with decreased survival in noncystic fibrosis obstructive lung diseases. These results suggest that under the LAS, pretransplant MV is associated with poorer short-term survival posttransplant. Notably, the increased risk of death appears to be strongest the early posttransplant period and limited to certain pretransplant diagnoses.
Background Lung disease is the leading cause of death in systemic sclerosis (SSc). The diagnosis of SSc-related lung disease (SSc-LD) is often a contraindication to lung transplantation (LT) due to concerns that extrapulmonary involvement will yield worse outcomes. We sought to evaluate posttransplantation outcomes in persons with SSc-LD with esophageal involvement compared with persons with nonconnective tissue disease–related interstitial lung disease (nCTD-ILD). Methods From 1998 to 2012, persons undergoing LT for SSc-LD were age and gender matched in a 2:1 fashion to controls undergoing LT for nCTD-ILD. Esophageal function was assessed by pH testing and manometry. We defined esophageal dysfunction as the presence of a DeMeester score >14 or dysmotility more severe than “mild nonspecific disorder”. The primary outcome was posttransplantation survival. Secondary outcomes included freedom from bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (fBOS) and rates of acute rejection. Survival and fBOS were estimated with Kaplan–Meier methods. Acute rejection was compared with Student’s t test. Results Survival was similar in 23 persons with SSc-LD and 46 controls who underwent LT (P=0.47). For the SSc-LD group, 1- and 5-year survival was 83% and 76% compared with 91% and 64% in the nCTD-ILD group, respectively. There were no differences in fBOS (P=0.83). Rates of acute rejection were less in SSc-ILD (P=0.05). Esophageal dysfunction was not associated with worse outcomes (P>0.55). Conclusions Persons with SSc-LD appear to have similar survival and fBOS as persons transplanted for nCTD-ILD. The risk of acute rejection after transplantation may be reduced in persons with SSc-LD. Esophageal involvement does not appear to impact outcomes.
New guidelines include several options for colorectal cancer screening. The goal of this study was to assess patient preferences for five approaches: no screening, fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), flexible sigmoidoscopy, barium enema, and colonoscopy.Patients from offices of primary care providers listened to a scripted oral presentation while viewing a table describing five screening methods and their outcomes. Immediately following the presentation, the subjects completed a questionnaire assessing their most preferred screening option and their likelihood of undergoing each option.One hundred subjects aged 50 to 75 years participated. The average age was 64 years; 54 of the subjects were women, and 87 were white. Ninety-six percent of patients preferred to be screened by some method. When asked which test they would choose as their primary method of screening, 38% preferred colonoscopy, 31% preferred FOBT, 14% preferred barium enema, and 13% preferred flexible sigmoidoscopy. When asked how likely they would be to undergo each procedure on a 5-point scale, patients rated FOBT highest with an average score of 4.4, followed by colonoscopy (3.4), barium enema (3.4), flexible sigmoidoscopy (3.4), and no screening (1.5). Acceptance rates for these tests when recommended by their physician were 96% (FOBT), 82% (flexible sigmoidoscopy), 92% (barium enema), and 86% (colonoscopy).Patients indicated a strong preference for colorectal cancer screening, but they did not indicate a dominant preference for any single screening test. Physicians need to take into account individual patient preferences when making recommendations regarding colorectal cancer screening.
