Sperm DNA fragmentation (sDF) negatively affects reproduction and is traditionally detected in total sperm population including viable and non-viable spermatozoa. Here, we aimed at exploring the ability of DNA fragmentation to discriminate fertile and subfertile men when detected in viable (viable sDF), non-viable (non-viable sDF), and total spermatozoa (total sDF). We revealed sDF in 91 male partners of infertile couples and 71 fertile men (max 1 year from natural conception) with LiveTUNEL coupled to flow cytometry, able to reveal simultaneously DNA fragmentation and cell viability. We found that the three sDF parameters discriminated fertile and subfertile men with similar accuracy and independently from age and basal semen parameters: AUCs (area under the curves) (95% CI) were: 0.696 (0.615-0.776), p < 0.001 for total sDF; 0.718 (0.640-0.797), p < 0.001 for viable sDF; 0.760 (0.685-0.835), p < 0.001 for non-viable sDF. We also found that total and non-viable but not viable sDF significantly correlated to age and semen quality. In conclusion, the three sDF parameters similarly discriminated fertile and subfertile men. Viable spermatozoa with DNA fragmentation are likely cells able to fertilize the oocyte but failing to properly support subsequent embryo development. Non-viable sDF could be a sign of a subtler damage extended beyond the non-viable cells.
Sperm cryopreservation is recommended to preserve male fertility for cancer patients or other medical conditions at risk of sperm decline. Whether motility and viability recovery rates vary depending on the medical conditions requiring cryopreservation is poorly known. We report here on the 24-year experience of our semen bank.Motility and viability recovery rates were evaluated in 1973 collections from patients with various medical conditions and 67 collections from donors, and the results were related to basal semen quality.Motility and viability recovery were highly related to basal semen quality and varied between cancer and non-cancer conditions, independently of the duration of cryopreservation and patient age. In samples with a sperm number below 2 × 106/mL, recovery rates approximated to zero. The highest recovery rates were found in donor collections. Cut-off values for the recovery of at least 1% motile spermatozoa were established based on initial semen quality.Our results indicate that the occurrence of any pathological or medical condition resulted in lower recovery rates with respect to donors, indicating that intrinsic sperm characteristics drive susceptibility to cryodamage. Established cut-off values for motility recovery can be useful for patient counseling as well as for ART laboratories to decide the type of procedure.
L'importanza della politica monetaria non convenzionale. Andamento dei bilanci di FED e BCE. La forward guidance e il canale delle aspettative. Impatto sulle aspettative di altri strumenti non convenzionali. Altri canali di trasmissione delle politiche non convenzionali.
Diabetes mellitus is a global epidemic characterized by high morbidity and mortality. Diabetes mellitus can lead to acute and chronic systemic complications. Among them, a negative effect of diabetes mellitus on sperm quality and male/couple fertility has been suggested. However, available studies in diabetes mellitus men evaluated relatively small cohorts with discordant results.To evaluate the clinical evidences of the effects of diabetes mellitus on sperm quality and fertility outcomes.An extensive Medline search was performed identifying studies in the English language.The prevalence of diabetes mellitus in infertile men ranges from 0.7% to 1.4%, while the prevalence of infertility in diabetes mellitus men, evaluated in a few studies, ranges from 35% to 51%. Male diabetes mellitus seems to play a negative effect on couple fecundity, while being childless or subfertile men might increase the risk of diabetes mellitus. Available cross-sectional studies investigating semen parameters and male sexual hormones in men with diabetes mellitus are heterogeneous, assessed relatively small cohorts, show often discordant results and frequently are not directly comparable to derive robust conclusions. Two meta-analyses support a negative effect of diabetes mellitus on sperm normal morphology and no effect on sperm total count, with contradictory results regarding other semen parameters. Considering only studies on type 1 diabetes mellitus men, meta-analyses support a negative effect of diabetes mellitus on sperm motility and no effect on sperm total count, with contradictory results regarding other semen parameters. The rate of children observed among type 1 diabetes mellitus men was lower than controls, especially in subjects with a longer diabetes mellitus duration. Couples with a diabetes mellitus male partner undergoing assisted reproduction techniques showed lower pregnancy rates than controls. No study evaluated the impact of diabetes mellitus treatment on semen quality and male fertility.Overall, available data show that diabetes mellitus might impair male reproductive health and couple fertility. However, further larger and full of details studies are needed.
