Indications for peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) for long-term venous access have grown during the last several years. There are various complications associated with PICC lines, a common one being venous thrombosis. This study's purpose was to determine the incidence of venous thrombosis associated with PICCs with and without prophylactic anticoagulants.In this observational, prospective, cohort study, patients with PICC lines were evaluated using Doppler ultrasound for the presence of PICC-associated venous thrombosis at 5-7 days and again at 12-14 days after line placement. When present, clinical signs and symptoms of thrombosis were documented. Fifty-six patients were evaluated for the type of anticoagulation used, if any, and other clinical parameters such as smoking, ambulation, and previous surgery. The incidence of thrombus was then calculated for the entire population as well as for specific patient subgroups.Patient age was 55.7 +/- 2.6 (mean +/- SEM) years, and BMI was 28.2 +/- 1.2 (n = 56). There were 38 (67.9%) nonambulatory subjects, 15 (26.8%) smokers, 4 (7.1%) coagulopathic subjects, 2 (3.6%) patients receiving estrogen-containing medications, 25 (44.6%) who had undergone surgery within the past 6 months, and 5 (8.9%) cancer patients. There were 21/56 patients (37.5%) with thrombus. Patients who received anticoagulation had a 22.9% (8/35) incidence of thrombosis, which was significantly less (P < .05) than for those who received no anticoagulant (13/21, 61.9%).The use of anticoagulants for prophylaxis in patients with a PICC line was associated with a decreased rate of associated venous thrombosis.
Nuclear matrix (NM), a proteinaceous network of filaments, dictates nuclear morphology and the structure/function of DNA. Phosphorylation of NM proteins is a potential signal for regulating matrix functions. Histones also are intimately involved in DNA structure and transcription. Here, we report that various histones enhanced 32P incorporation into certain NM proteins. Modulation of NM protein phosphorylation by histones is mediated through regulation of protein kinase CK2, a messenger-independent serine/threonine kinase, which is significantly associated with the NM. The stimulatory effect of histones was mitigated by prior incubation of histones with DNA in the reaction. Phosphorylation of NM proteins was extensively reduced when an excess of the CK2-specific peptide substrate was included in the phosphorylation reaction as a competitor. Also, enhancement in the NM-associated CK2 activity by histones was blocked by inhibitors of CK2. Histone H1 effect appeared to be mediated mainly by charge effect since a stretch of polylysine induced a similar effect. Various histones also differentially affected the autophosphorylation of NM-associated CK2 subunits. This may contribute to the observed effects of histones on the NM, resulting in an enhancement and differential pattern of NM protein phosphorylation. Such a regional modification of NM protein phosphorylation might influence the nuclear functions that require histone displacement, namely, replication and transcription. J. Cell. Biochem. 72:242–250, 1999.
We have extensively purified three of the hepatic microsomal intralumenal Ca2+-binding proteins, CBP1, CBP2, and CBP3, which were originally described by Van et al. [(1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 17494-17501]. These apparently homogeneous preparations showed only single 45Ca2+ binding bands. On the basis of the peptide sequence, CBP2 was found to be highly homologous with the previously described protein ERp72. Similarly, CBP3 was identical to calreticulin and CBP1 had some homology to calmodulin. Contrary to the report of Van et al. (1989), we found that CBP2 had little thiol:protein disulfide oxidoreductase activity. Of the three purified preparations, only CBP2 exhibited apparent intrinsic protein kinase activity. This activity was found to be due to contamination of the CBP2 preparation by an extremely low concentration of tightly bound casein kinase 2 (CK2). In line with this observation, the phosphorylation was inhibited by heparin, removed by antibody to CK2, and stimulated by spermine. Furthermore, CBP2 was readily phosphorylated in vitro by added CK2 but only slowly phosphorylated by several other protein kinases. Thus, the persistence of CK2 in a highly purified preparation of CBP2 along with several other lines of evidence presented in this study might suggest that the protein CBP2 is a physiologically relevant substrate for CK2. Furthermore, these data suggest that CK2 might be localized in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum and that the phosphorylation of CBP2 in the lumen may play a role in the chaperone activity attributed to this protein.
272 Background: Patients with newly diagnosed GI cancers require diagnostic studies and evaluations by physicians that may delay initiation of cancer care. Uninsured populations are particularly vulnerable. A Nurse Navigator (NN) can help decrease barriers and improve timeliness of care. This study aims to compare timeliness of cancer care received by patients referred to a GI MDC Program by the patient’s insurance status at the time of referral. Methods: Patients referred to the GI MDC are assigned a NN who evaluates medical history, diagnostic studies, and coordinates further testing and physician evaluations. Timeliness measures assessing milestones in cancer care initiation are collected prospectively. Descriptive statistics are presented and average times for measures are compared by insurance status (insured vs. uninsured) using t-tests, chi-square tests, and the Fisher’s Exact test. Results: 366 patients were evaluated between January 2010 and June 2012. 70% (255/366) were for new cancer diagnoses. Median age of cancer patients was 64 years (range 29-94), 63.1% of patients were male, and 94.1% of patients had insurance. Major cancer diagnosis types were colon/rectal (19.2%), esophageal/gastric (25.1%), hepatobiliary (12.8%) and pancreatic/ampullary/duodenal (35.7%) and 1.6% other. The table describes timeliness and care coordination measures by insurance status. Conclusions: Uninsured cancer patients in our health system appear to receive care in a timely fashion which does not differ from patients with insurance. The impact of a dedicated GI NN in avoiding disparate care for uninsured warrants further study. [Table: see text]
