Henriette Naims

Research Institute For Sustainability – Helmholtz Centre Potsdam

Author Statistics

Papers

Citation

H-Index

i-10 index

Research Trends

Author Order

Document Type

Co-Authors

Barbara Olfe-Kräutlein

Research Institute For Sustainability – Helmholtz Centre Potsdam

Stephen McCord

University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

Arno Zimmermann

Technische Universität Berlin

Katy Armstrong

University of Sheffield

Volker Sick

University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

Annika Marxen

Technische Universität Berlin

Till Strunge

Research Institute For Sustainability – Helmholtz Centre Potsdam

Johannes Wunderlich

Technische Universität Berlin

Leonard Jan Müller

RWTH Aachen University

Reinhard Schomäcker

Technische Universität Berlin

Cooperative Institutions

RWTH Aachen University

Research Institute For Sustainability – Helmholtz Centre Potsdam

United States Department of Energy

Technische Universität Berlin

FH Aachen

University of Sheffield

University of Michigan–Ann Arbor

ETH Zurich

University of Edinburgh

Centre for Sustainable Energy

Author Statistics

Papers

Citation

H-Index

i-10 index

Research Field

Making Sense of Techno-Economic Assessment & Life Cycle Assessment Studies for CO2 Utilization: A guide on how to commission, understand, and derive decisions from TEA and LCA studies

Lorenzo Cremonese Barbara Olfe-Kräutlein Till Strunge Henriette Naims Arno Zimmermann

The selection of

10.3998/2027.42/156039

Cite

Citations (5)

CO2 as an Asset

Barbara Olfe-Kräutlein Henriette Naims Thomas Bruhn Ana Maria Lorente Lafuente Mario Tobias

10.2312/iass.2014.013

Cite

Citations (1)

Techno-Economic Assessment & Life Cycle Assessment Guidelines for CO2 Utilization (Version 1.1)

Arno Zimmermann Leonard Jan Müller Yuan Wang Tim Langhorst Johannes Wunderlich

Source

Cite

Citations (9)

The Social Acceptance of Carbon Dioxide Utilisation: A Review and Research Agenda

Frontiers in Energy Research (2017)

Christopher R. Jones Barbara Olfe-Kräutlein Henriette Naims Katy Armstrong

CO2 utilisation technologies—also called Carbon Dioxide Utilisation (CDU) and Carbon Capture and Utilisation (CCU)—convert CO2 via physical, chemical or biological processes into carbon-based products. CO2 utilisation technologies are viewed as a means of helping to address climate change and broadening the raw material base for commodities that can be sold to generate economic revenue. However, while technical research and development into the feasibility of CO2 utilisation options is accelerating rapidly; at present there has been limited research into the social acceptance of the technology and CO2-derived products. This review article outlines and explores three key dimensions of social acceptance (i.e. socio-political, market, and community acceptance) pertaining to innovation within CO2 utilisation. The article highlights the importance of considering issues of social acceptance as an aspect of the research, development, demonstration and deployment process for CO2 utilisation and explores how key stakeholders operating on each dimension might affect the innovation pathways, investment and siting decisions relating to CO2 utilisation facilities and CO2-derived products. Beyond providing a state-of-the-art review of current research into the social acceptance of CO2 utilisation, this article also outlines an agenda for future research in the field.

Scope (computer science)

Investment

Social Acceptance

10.3389/fenrg.2017.00011

Cite

Citations (95)

Making Sense of Techno-Economic and Life Cycle Assessment Studies for CO2 Utilization

Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (2022)

Lorenzo Cremonese Till Strunge Barbara Olfe-Kräutlein Sander Jahilo Tim Langhorst

10.7302/4202

Cite

Citations (0)

Techno-Economic Assessment & Life-Cycle Assessment Guidelines for CO2 Utilization

Arno Zimmerman Johannes Wunderlich Georg Büchner Leonard Jan Müller Katy Armstrong

Development of standardized CO2 Life Cycle and Techno-economic Assessment Guidelines was commissioned by CO2 Sciences, Inc., with the support of 3M, EIT Climate-KIC, CO2 Value Europe, Emissions Reduction Alberta, Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment, R. K. Mellon Foundation, Cynthia and George Mitchell Foundation, National Institute of Clean and Low Carbon Energy, Praxair, Inc., XPRIZE and generous individuals who are committed to action to address climate change.

Foundation (evidence)

George (robot)

10.3998/2027.42/145436

Cite

Citations (72)

CO2 as an Asset: Challenges and potential for society

Barbara Olfe-Kraeutlein Henriette Naims Thomas Bruhn Ana Maria Lorente Lafuente

10.2312/iass.2017.020

Cite

Citations (1)

Techno-Economic Assessment & Life Cycle Assessment Guidelines for CO2 Utilization (Version 2.0)

Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (2022)