The authors explored the current practice of fellowship training in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia and surveyed the acceptability of potential solutions to mitigate the interrupted fellowship training during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.A prospective electronic questionnaire-based survey.The survey was initiated by the Education Committee of the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anesthesiology and Intensive Care (EACTAIC).The study comprised EACTAIC fellows, EACTAIC, and non-EACTAIC subscribers to the EACTAIC newsletter and EACTAIC followers on different social media platforms.After obtaining the consent of participants, the authors assessed the perioperative management of COVID-19 patients, infrastructural aspects of the workplace, local routines for preoperative testing, the perceived availability of personal protective equipment (PPE), and the impact of COVID-19 on fellowship training. In addition, participants rated suggested solutions by the investigators to cope with the interruption of fellowship training, using a traffic light signal scale.The authors collected 193 responses from 54 countries. Of the respondents, 82.4% reported cancelling or postponing elective cases during the first wave, 89.7% had provided care for COVID-19 patients, 75.1% reported staff in their center being reassigned to work in the intensive care unit (ICU), and 45% perceived a shortage of PPE at their centers. Most respondents reported the termination of local educational activities (79.6%) and fellowship assessments (51.5%) because of the pandemic (although 84% of them reported having time to participate in online teaching), and 83% reported a definitive psychological impact. More than 90% of the respondents chose green and/or yellow traffic lights to rate the importance of the suggested solutions to cope with the interrupted fellowship training during the pandemic.The COVID-19 pandemic led to the cancellation of elective cases, the deployment of anesthesiologists to ICUs, the involvement of anesthesiologists in perioperative care for COVID-19 patients, and the interruption of educational activities and trainees' assessments. There is some consensus on the suggested solutions for mitigation of the interruption in fellowship training.
Patients who undergo mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation and have mild residual mitral regurgitation may have an increased risk of re-operation in future years. Intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography has now become a standard of practice for mitral valve repair surgery. We identified 106 patients who underwent attempted mitral valve repair over a three-year period in our institution. We retrospectively reviewed the grade of residual mitral regurgitation assigned following successful mitral valve repair (‘mild’ or less residual regurgitation) by intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography and compared it to the observed grade of mitral regurgitation seen at follow-up transthoracic echocardiography. No patient had unexpected moderate or severe mitral regurgitation postoperatively, suggesting that intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography performed in a medium-sized department is a sensitive tool for the early detection of failed mitral repair. Mild residual mitral regurgitation on intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography was not reliably associated with mild mitral regurgitation on follow-up transthoracic echocardiography. In fact, 61% of patients with mild mitral regurgitation identified by intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography had reduced mitral regurgitation at follow-up transthoracic echocardiography (to nil/trace residual mitral regurgitation). This observation, in conjunction with the limitations of the data supporting the goal of ‘echo perfect’ repair, suggests that a second attempt at repair should not be made based on the intraoperative transoesophageal echocardiography finding of mild residual mitral regurgitation alone.
It has been suggested that removal of a laryngeal mask airway with the cuff inflated may remove more secretions than with the cuff deflated. We performed a study to determine whether this suggestion is correct. Patients were randomly allocated to removal of the laryngeal mask airway with the cuff deflated ( n = 75) or inflated ( n = 74). The laryngeal mask airways were weighed before insertion and after removal, the difference in these two weights being taken to be the mass of secretions adherent to the airways on removal. The mean (SD) increase in laryngeal mask airway weight was 2.45 (1.47) g with the cuff deflated and 3.03 (1.76) g with the cuff inflated (p = 0.03). We conclude that removal of the laryngeal mask airway with the cuff inflated removes approximately 0.5 g more secretions than with the cuff deflated.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and performance of a novel, beating heart procedure that enables echocardiographic-guided beating heart implantation of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) artificial cords on the posterior mitral leaflet of patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation.Two prospective multicentre studies enrolled 13 (first-in-human) and 52 subjects, respectively. Patients were treated with the HARPOON beating heart mitral valve repair system. The primary (30-day) end point was successful implantation of cord(s) with mitral regurgitation reduction to ≤moderate. An independent core laboratory analysed echocardiograms.Of 65 patients enrolled, 62 (95%) achieved technical success, 2 patients required conversion to open surgery and 1 procedure was terminated. The primary end point was met in 59/65 (91%) patients. Among the 62 treated patients, the mean procedural time was 2.1 ± 0.5 h. Through discharge, there were no deaths, strokes or renal failure events. At 1 year, 2 of the 62 patients died (3%) and 8 (13%) others required reoperations. At 1 year, 98% of the patients with HARPOON cords were in New York Heart Association class I or II, and mitral regurgitation was none/trace in 52% (n = 27), mild in 23% (n = 12), moderate in 23% (n = 12) and severe in 2% (n = 1). Favourable cardiac remodelling outcomes at 1 year included decreased end-diastolic left ventricular volume (153 ± 41 to 119 ± 28 ml) and diameter (53 ± 5 to 47 ± 6 mm), and the mean transmitral gradient was 1.4 ± 0.7 mmHg.This initial clinical experience with the HARPOON beating heart mitral valve repair system demonstrates encouraging early safety and performance.NCT02432196 and NCT02768870.