Administrative database studies have reported on the safety of same-day discharge (SDD) following total joint arthroplasty (TJA); however, most patient cohorts have been defined by length of stay (LOS), and the proportion discharged directly home remains unknown. The purpose of this investigation was to (1) determine common dispositions for patients undergoing SDD TJA; (2) understand changes in discharge disposition over time; and (3) determine the safety of SDD TJA, stratified by discharge disposition. The PearlDiver Database was reviewed for patients who underwent SDD TJA (LOS of 0 days) from 2011 to 2016. Patients were stratified by discharge disposition, and rates and complications following SDD TJA were assessed accordingly. Chi-square analysis was performed to compare demographics and complications between patient groups stratified by disposition. From 2011 to 2016, there was an exponential increase in the annual rate of SDD TJA from 0.95% to 20.5%, respectively; however, the annual proportion of patients discharged directly home remained unchanged (approximately 68%), with the remaining discharged directly to an alternate care facility, most commonly inpatient rehabilitation. Patients discharged to an alternate facility were significantly older ( P <.001), had significantly higher comorbidity scores ( P <.001), and had significantly more complications ( P <.001) than those patients discharged directly home. Although the annual rate of SDD TJA is increasing, up to one-third of patients are not discharged directly home—a proportion unchanged over time. Moving forward, administrative database studies examining SDD TJA must account for discharge disposition; moreover, there is a need to understand the practice of SDD TJA to an alternate care facility. [ Orthopedics . 2020;43(4):204–208.]
Emerging evidence suggests preoperative opioid use may increase the risk of negative outcomes following orthopedic procedures. This systematic review evaluated the impact of preoperative opioid use in patients undergoing shoulder surgery with respect to preoperative clinical outcomes, postoperative complications, and postoperative dependence on opioids.EMBASE, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and CINAHL were searched from inception to April, 2021 for studies reporting preoperative opioid use and its effect on postoperative outcomes or opioid use. The search, data extraction and methodologic assessment were performed in duplicate for all included studies.Twenty-one studies with a total of 257,301 patients were included in the final synthesis. Of which, 17 were level III evidence. Of those, 51.5% of the patients reported pre-operative opioid use. Fourteen studies (66.7%) reported a higher likelihood of opioid use at follow-up among those used opioids preoperatively compared to preoperative opioid-naïve patients. Eight studies (38.1%) showed lower functional measurements and range of motion in opioid group compared to the non-opioid group post-operatively.Preoperative opioid use in patients undergoing shoulder surgeries is associated with lower functional scores and post-operative range of motion. Most concerning is preoperative opioid use may predict increased post-operative opioid requirements and potential for misuse in patients.Level IV, Systematic review.
Overhead throwing is a common causative factor in disorders of the proximal biceps in athletes. In recent years, arthroscopic repair of unstable superior labral tears or biceps tendonitis involving the long head of the biceps tendon anchor has become the standard of care. However, in some cases, superior labrum anterior-posterior (SLAP) repair requires additional evaluation and even revision surgery, which contributes to patient dissatisfaction. Differentiating overall biceps tendonitis from superior labral tears alone can be a challenge. More recently, biceps tenodesis has been suggested as a potential option for the treatment of SLAP lesions in overhead athletes. This option is controversial, and data on return to play in overhead athletes are scant.
Objectives: Most clinical studies pertaining to shoulder dislocation use age cutoffs of 16 years, and at present, only small case series of patients aged 10-16 years guide our management. Using a general population cohort aged 10 to 16 years, we sought to: 1) determine the overall and demographic-specific incidence density rate (IDR) of primary anterior shoulder dislocation requiring closed reduction (CR), and 2) determine the rate of and risk factors for repeat shoulder CR. Methods: Using administrative databases, we identified all patients who underwent CR of a primary anterior shoulder dislocation by a physician in Ontario between April 2002 and September 2010 (the index event). Exclusion criteria included age (16 years), posterior dislocation, and prior shoulder dislocation or surgery. The IDR was calculated for the entire cohort and compared by age and sex subgroups. The main outcome, repeat shoulder CR, was sought until September 2012. A time-to-event analysis (cumulative incidence function) was used to determine the incidence of repeat shoulder CR at six-months, one-year, two-years, and five-years for the entire cohort and subgroups based on age (10-12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 years). A competing risk model identified risk factors for repeat shoulder CR, which were reported using hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: We identified 2,066 patients aged 10-16 years who underwent CR following a primary anterior shoulder dislocation, of which, 1,937 met the exclusion criteria. The median age was 15.0 years and 79.7% were male. The IDR was 20.1 per 100,000 person-years, and was highest among 16 year-old males (164.4 per 100,000 person-years). In contrast, primary anterior shoulder dislocation was rare among patients aged 10-12 years [5.9% (N=115) of all primary dislocations]. Repeat shoulder CR was observed in 740 patients (38.2%) after a median of 0.8 years. The overall cumulative incidence of repeat shoulder CR at six-months, one-year, two-years, and five-years was 13.0%, 21.3%, 29.2%, and 36.2%, respectively; however, the cumulative incidence by age (Figure 1) revealed the rate of repeat shoulder CR to be highest among 14-16 year-olds (37.2-42.3%), and considerably less among patients aged 10-13 years (0-25.0%). Male sex (HR 1.2, p=0.04; interpreted as a 20% increased risk for males as compared to females) and patient age (HR 1.2, p<0.001; interpreted as a 20% increased risk for each year over age 10) significantly influenced the risk of a repeat shoulder CR. Overall, 31.2% (N=604) of patients underwent shoulder stabilization, of which, half underwent surgery following the index shoulder CR (49.9%, N=369). Conclusion: Primary anterior shoulder dislocations are common among 14-16 year olds, and the rate of recurrence in this age group following non-operative management mirrors that of 17-20 year olds in previously published data. In contrast, both the incidence of primary anterior dislocation and rate of recurrence are considerably lower for patients aged 10-13 years. Going forward, clinicians should treat and counsel patients aged 14-16 years, particularly males, as they do older adolescents (17-20 years); however, patients 13 years of age or younger should be counselled regarding their low risk for recurrence.
There is increasing interest in outpatient shoulder arthroplasty (SA); however, the clinical evidence behind this practice is sparse. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety of outpatient SA performed in an ambulatory surgery center and to determine patient factors that are associated with increased risk for perioperative complications or dissatisfaction.Patient demographics and operative variables were collected retrospectively for patients undergoing outpatient SA at 2 ambulatory surgery centers with a minimum follow-up of 90 days. Patients completed a postsurgery questionnaire about their experience, satisfaction, pain control, and health care use.Forty-one anatomic total SAs (n = 32) and reverse SAs (n = 9) with a mean follow-up of 60 weeks (16.4 weeks-3 years) were included. The mean age, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class were 60.6 ± 4.8 years, 31.8 ± 6.6, 2.9 ± 1.9, and 2.3 ± 0.6, respectively. Three (7.3%) minor complications occurred within 90 days of the SA, none before first follow-up. Two patients stayed in the ambulatory surgery center 23-hour observation unit. Thirty-five patients (85.4%) completed the questionnaire, of whom 97.0% (n = 32) were satisfied with the outpatient procedure. Two patients had difficulties with postoperative pain control and were taking chronic narcotic medication before surgery.Outpatient SA in an ambulatory surgery center is safe with high patient satisfaction and low rates of perioperative complications. Although larger cohorts are required to adequately determine which patients will be appropriate candidates for an outpatient SA, our findings do suggest that patients with a history of preoperative narcotic use may have difficulties or dissatisfaction with outpatient SA.
Introduction Stemless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is used to treat rotator cuff deficient arthropathies, rheumatoid arthritis, and osteoarthritis. It has several advantages over the stemmed implant including preservation of bone stock, reduced surgical time, and easier revision. Methods A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and CENTRAL to retrieve all relevant studies evaluating stemless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Results The literature search identified 1993 studies out of which 7 studies were included in this review; 324 patients underwent stemless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty with a weighted mean age of 74.1 (SD = 8.6, range = 38 to 93) years and a weighted mean follow-up time of 44 (SD = 6.6, range = 3 to 95) months. The included studies reported significant improvements in range of motion and functional scores comparable to stemmed reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. The weight mean flexion and abduction was (135 ± 12)° and (131 ± 12)° post-operatively, respectively. The weighted mean constant score increased from (26.7 ± 5.2) Patients (pts) to (63.0 ± 8.0) pts post-operatively. Overall complication and revision rate were 12.3% and 5.2%. Conclusion Early and mid-term results indicate stemless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty has similar clinical outcomes to stemmed reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. There was no radiological evidence of humeral loosening at the latest follow-up.
