M. Pérez-Fierro

Universidad de Sevilla

Author Statistics

Papers

Citation

H-Index

i-10 index

Research Trends

Author Order

Document Type

Co-Authors

L. Castellanos‐Cosano

Universidad de Sevilla

J. Corcuera-Flores

Universidad de Sevilla

Daniel Torres‐Lagares

Universidad de Sevilla

Guillermo Machuca‐Portillo

Universidad de Sevilla

Andrés Blanco Carrión

Universidade de Santiago de Compostela

Cooperative Institutions

Universidad de Sevilla

Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío

Universidad Fernando Pessoa Canarias

Stomatology Hospital

Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla

Tecnológico Nacional de México

Instituto Politécnico Nacional

Center for Research and Advanced Studies of the National Polytechnic Institute

Universidad de Málaga

Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Author Statistics

Papers

Citation

H-Index

i-10 index

Research Field

Bone loss around narrow implants versus standard diameter implants: Retrospective 2-years case-control study

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry (2020)

J. Corcuera-Flores M. Pérez-Fierro Andrés Blanco Carrión Daniel Torrés-Lagares L. Castellanos‐Cosano

The objectives were to evaluate the bone loss (BL) around narrow diameter implants (3.3 mm) 2 years after implant loading and compare with the bone loss around conventional-diameter implants (4.1 mm), as well as with clinical and anatomical variables. 2-years follow-up.Cases: 20 patients either gender-age, narrow implants (Straumann TM-SLA, diameter 3.3 mm); Control: 20 patients matching for gender-age, conventional implants (Straumann TM-SLA, diameter 4.1). Total 82 implants (31 narrow implants and 51 conventional implants) in 40 patients. To avoid statistical bias, a cluster of one implant per patient was randomly selected (20 narrow implants and 20 conventional implants). To evaluate changes resulting from bone loss around the implants, a total of 80 panoramic radiographs were taken of all 40 patients; the first panoramic image was taken at the time of implant loading and the second one 2 years later. Clinical and demographic variables were obtained from the patients' medical records. Statistical method: Spearman's correlation coefficient, chi-squared (Haberman's post hoc), Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Statistical significance p< 0.05.No significant differences in bone loss around were found around narrow implants versus conventional implants. Differences linked to tobacco use were found after studying one implant per patient (p< 0.05).With the limitations of the present study, no significant differences in BL were found when comparing narrow implants with conventional implants after 2 years of implant loading. There were also no differences found when accounting for other demographic and clinical variables, with the exception of tobacco use. Key words:Lagervall & Jansson's index, bone loss, narrow implants, panoramic radiographs.

Post hoc

Statistical Analysis

Clinical Significance

10.4317/medoral.56422

Cite

Citations (5)

Bone loss around narrow implants versus standard diameter implants: Retrospective 2-years case-control study

Journal of Clinical and Experimental Dentistry (2020)

J. Corcuera-Flores M. Pérez-Fierro Andrés Blanco Carrión Daniel Torrés-Lagares L. Castellanos‐Cosano

Background: The objectives were to evaluate the bone loss (BL) around narrow diameter implants (3.3 mm) 2 years after implant loading and compare with the bone loss around conventional-diameter implants (4.1 mm), as well as with clinical and anatomical variables.2-years follow-up.Material and Methods: Cases: 20 patients either gender-age, narrow implants (Straumann TM-SLA, diameter 3.3 mm); Control: 20 patients matching for gender-age, conventional implants (Straumann TM-SLA, diameter 4.1).Total 82 implants (31 narrow implants and 51 conventional implants) in 40 patients.To avoid statistical bias, a cluster of one implant per patient was randomly selected (20 narrow implants and 20 conventional implants).To evaluate changes resulting from bone loss around the implants, a total of 80 panoramic radiographs were taken of all 40 patients; the first panoramic image was taken at the time of implant loading and the second one 2 years later.Clinical and demographic variables were obtained from the patients' medical records.Statistical method: Spearman's correlation coefficient, chi-squared (Haberman's post hoc), Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests.Statistical significance p < 0.05.Results: No significant differences in bone loss around were found around narrow implants versus conventional implants.Differences linked to tobacco use were found after studying one implant per patient (p < 0.05).Conclusions: With the limitations of the present study, no significant differences in BL were found when comparing narrow implants with conventional implants after 2 years of implant loading.There were also no differences found when accounting for other demographic and clinical variables, with the exception of tobacco use.

10.4317/jced.56422

Cite

Citations (5)