Patients with antibody deficiency respond poorly to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination and are at risk of severe or prolonged infection. They are given long-term immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IRT) prepared from healthy donor plasma to confer passive immunity against infection. Following widespread COVID-19 vaccination alongside natural exposure, we hypothesized that immunoglobulin preparations will now contain neutralizing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike antibodies, which confer protection against COVID-19 disease and may help to treat chronic infection.
Abstract Influenza remains a significant threat to human and animal health. Assessing serological protection against influenza has relied upon haemagglutinin inhibition assays, which are used to gauge existing immune landscapes, seasonal vaccine decisions and in systems vaccinology studies. Here, we adapt our high-throughput live virus microneutralisation assay for SARS-CoV-2, benchmark against haemagglutinin inhibition assays, and report serological vaccine responsiveness in a cohort of older (>65yo) community dwelling adults (n=73), after the adjuvanted 2021-22 Northern Hemisphere quadrivalent vaccine. We performed both assays against all four viruses represented in the vaccine (A/Cambodia/H3N2/2020, A/H1pdm/Victoria/2570/2019, B/Yamagata/Phuket/2013, BVIC/Washington/02/201), using sera drawn on days 0 [range: d-28 to d0], 7 [d6-10] and 182 [d161-196] with respect to vaccination. We found population-level concordance between the two assays (Spearman’s correlation coefficient range 0.48-0.88; all P≤1.4 × 10 −5 ). The improved granularity of microneutralisation was better able to estimate fold-changes of responses, and quantify the inhibitory effect of pre-existing antibody. Our high-throughput method offers an alternative approach to assess influenza-specific serological responses with improved resolution.
Abstract Emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants require rapid assessments of pathogenicity and evasion of existing immunity to inform policy. A crucial component of these assessments is accurate estimation of serum neutralising antibody titres using cultured live virus isolates. Here, we report our updated culture methods for Omicron sub-variant JN.1 using Caco-2 cells and the subsequent evaluation of neutralising antibody titres (nAbTs) in recipients of BNT162b2-XBB.1.5 monovalent and the Ancestral/BA.5 containing bivalent vaccines. We compared culture of JN.1 in either Vero V1 cells or Caco-2 cells, finding culture in Vero V1 either resulted in low-titre stocks or induced crucial mutations at the Spike furin cleavage site. Using the sequence-clean culture stocks generated in Caco-2 cells, we assessed serum samples from 71 healthy adults eligible for a COVID-19 vaccination given as a 5 th dose booster: all participants had detectable nAbs against JN.1 prior to vaccination, with baseline/pre-existing nAbTs between both vaccine groups comparable (p = 0.240). However, nAbTs against JN.1 post-vaccination were 2.6-fold higher for recipients of the monovalent XBB1.5 vaccine than the BA.4/5 bivalent vaccine (p<0.001). Regular re-appraisal of methods involved in the evaluation of new variants is required to ensure robust data are used to underpin crucial severity assessments as variants arise and vaccine strain selection decisions.
BackgroundThe humoral and T-cell responses to booster COVID-19 vaccine types in multidisease immunocompromised individuals who do not generate adequate antibody responses to two COVID-19 vaccine doses, is not fully understood. The OCTAVE DUO trial aimed to determine the value of third vaccinations in a wide range of patients with primary and secondary immunodeficiencies.MethodsOCTAVE-DUO was a prospective, open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial investigating humoral and T-cell responses in patients who are immunocompromised following a third vaccine dose with BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273, and of NVX-CoV2373 for those with lymphoid malignancies. We recruited patients who were immunocompromised from 11 UK hospitals, aged at least 18 years, with previous sub-optimal responses to two doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 (1:1:1 for those with lymphoid malignancies), stratified by disease, previous vaccination type, and anti-spike antibody response following two doses. Individuals with lived experience of immune susceptibility were involved in the study design and implementation. The primary outcome was vaccine-specific immunity defined by anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies (Roche Diagnostics UK and Ireland, Burgess Hill, UK) and T-cell responses (Oxford Immunotec, Abingdon, UK) before and 21 days after the third vaccine dose analysed by a modified intention-to-treat analysis. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN 15354495, and the EU Clinical Trials Register, EudraCT 2021-003632-87, and is complete.FindingsBetween Aug 4, 2021 and Mar 31, 2022, 804 participants across nine disease cohorts were randomly assigned to receive BNT162b2 (n=377), mRNA-1273 (n=374), or NVX-CoV2373 (n=53). 356 (45%) of 789 participants were women, 433 (55%) were men, and 659 (85%) of 775 were White. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibodies measured 21 days after the third vaccine dose were significantly higher than baseline pre-third dose titres in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (median 1384 arbitrary units [AU]/mL [IQR 4·3–7990·0] compared with median 11·5 AU/mL [0·4–63·1]; p<0·001). Of participants who were baseline low responders, 380 (90%) of 423 increased their antibody concentrations to more than 400 AU/mL. Conversely, 166 (54%) of 308 baseline non-responders had no response after the third dose. Detectable T-cell responses following the third vaccine dose were seen in 494 (80%) of 616 participants. There were 24 serious adverse events (BNT612b2 eight [33%] of 24, mRNA-1273 12 [50%], NVX-CoV2373 four [17%]), two (8%) of which were categorised as vaccine-related. There were seven deaths (1%) during the trial, none of which were vaccine-related.InterpretationA third vaccine dose improved the serological and T-cell response in the majority of patients who are immunocompromised. Individuals with chronic renal disease, lymphoid malignancy, on B-cell targeted therapies, or with no serological response after two vaccine doses are at higher risk of poor response to a third vaccine dose.FundingMedical Research Council, Blood Cancer UK.
Wu et al. report that patients with hematologic malignancies have reduced immunity against SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariants and Sotrovimab retains neutralizing capacity against all tested Omicron subvariants.
'%3e%3cpath fill='%23012169' d='M0 0v30h60V0z'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='6' d='m0 0 60 30m0-30L0 30'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23C8102E' stroke-width='4' d='m0 0 60 30m0-30L0 30' clip-path='url(%23b)'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='10' d='M30 0v30M0 15h60'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23C8102E' stroke-width='6' d='M30 0v30M0 15h60'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e)