Penile Doppler ultrasonography is widely accepted as an essential examination in the diagnosis of impotence. However, measurement blood flow velocity using Doppler ultrasonography may be subject to some errors. We performed color Doppler ultrasonography in 63 patients with normal penile vascular function as diagnosed using positive responses to intracavernous pharmacological stimulation. We compared the Doppler measurement results of the 126 cavernous arteries and the ultrasonic beam angles. We used a Hitachi EUB 515, a sonographic probe of 7.5 MHz, a sampling width of 0.8 mm, a sampling depth of 1 mm, and a wall motion filter was not used. Ultrasonic beam angles were 5 to 77 degrees. The mean peak systolic velocity and end diastolic velocity values were 40. 0 cm/s and 3.9 cm/sec, respectively. The peak systolic velocity and end diastolic velocity values remained stable regardless of the ultrasonic beam angles (Kruskal-Wallis test, p = 0.56, p = 0.70). However, the variance of values became greater when the ultrasonic beam angles was larger than 55 degrees in the case of peak systolic velocity (F test, p < 0.05) and 50 degrees in the case of end diastolic velocity (F test, p < 0.05), indicating a reduction in reliability. Resistance index variance was significantly higher when ultrasonic beam angle exceeds 50 degrees (F test, p < 0.05). We believe that we should accept only those cavernous artery peak systolic velocity measurements as reliable when the ultrasound beam angle is less than 55 degrees.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Pharmaco-dynamic infusion cavernosometry and cavernosography (pharmaco-DICC) is essential for diagnosis of venogenic impotence, however it is so invasive. On the other hand, color Doppler ultrasonography is non-invasive and has become one of the useful diagnostic methods for arteriogenic impotence. And there are some reports evaluating whether venogenic impotence can be diagnosed using color Doppler ultrasonography. In this study, we investigated whether the resistance index (RI) could be useful for screening for venogenic impotence.We performed color Doppler ultrasonography in 49 patients who had shown negative responses to an intracavernous injection of 20 mcg of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1). They previously underwent pharmaco-DICC and were diagnosed venogenic impotent when the maintenance flow rate was equal to or more than 20 ml/min. In 49 patients, 17 patients had DICC normality, while 32 patients had corporal leakages. After an intracavernous injection of 20 mcg of PGE1, we performed color Doppler ultrasonography, and measured peak systolic velocity (PSV) and end diastolic velocity (EDV) in the cavernous artery. RI was calculated as follows. RI = (PSV-EDV)/PSV We adopted the RI value near to 1 as the case's RI from two RI values of bilateral cavernous arteries, and compared RI values with the results of pharmaco-DICC.RI range in patients with normal DICC results was 0.895 +/- 0.092 (0.70-1.00), while RI range in patients with corporal leakages was 0.742 +/- 0.095 (0.55-0.97). RI values in patients with corporal leakages were significantly lower than those in patients with normal DICC results although there was some overlap in each group. From receiver-operating-characteristic curve (ROC curve) of the correlation between sensitivity and specificity at various RI values compared with DICC results, the RI cut off values were set up at 0.75 and 0.90, and classified the patients into 3 group according to their RI cut off values. In 10 patients with 0.9 < RI, 9 patients (90%) had DICC normality. In 17 patients with 0.75 < RI < or = 0.9, 7 patients had DICC normality while 10 patients had corporal leakages. In 22 patients with RI < or = 0.75, 21 patients (95.5%) had corporal leakages.We consider without carrying out pharmaco-DICC that patients with 0.9 < RI were not venogenic impotent, while patients with RI < or = 0.75 had corporal leakages. Pharmaco-DICC will remain essential only in patients with 0.75 < RI < or = 0.9.
