We looked to determine the rates of audiovestibular symptoms following sports-related concussions among collegiate athletes. Further, we assessed the correlation between these symptoms and the time to return to participation in athletic activity.Retrospective analysis of the National Collegiate Athletic Association Injury Surveillance System (NCAA-ISS).The NCAA-ISS was queried from 2009 through 2014 for seven men's sports and eight women's sports across divisions 1, 2, and 3. Injuries resulting in concussions were analyzed for audiovestibular symptoms, duration of symptoms, and return to participation times.From 2009 to 2014, there were 1,647 recorded sports-related concussions, with athletes reporting dizziness (68.2%), imbalance (35.8%), disorientation (31.4%), noise sensitivity (29.9%), and tinnitus (8.5%). Concussion symptoms resolved within 1 day (17.1%), within 2 to 7 days (50.0%), within 8 to 30 days (25.9%), or persisted over 1 month (7.0%). Return to participation occurred within 1 week (38.3%), within 1 month (53.0%), or over 1 month (8.7%). Using Mann-Whitney U testing, overall symptom duration and return to competition time were significantly increased when any of these symptoms were present (P < 0.05). Duration of concussion symptom correlated with dizziness (P = 0.043) and noise sensitivity (P = 0.000), whereas return to participation times correlated with imbalance (P = 0.011) and noise sensitivity (P = 0.000). Dizziness and imbalance (odds ratio: 4.15, confidence interval: 3.20-5.38, P < 0.001) were the two symptoms with the strongest association.Audiovestibular symptoms are common complaints among collegiate athletes sustaining concussions. Dizziness and noise sensitivity correlated with the duration of concussive symptoms, whereas imbalance and noise sensitivity was correlated with prolonged return to competition time.4. Laryngoscope, 127:2850-2853, 2017.
Objective Participation in National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) sports increases annually, yet the risk of maxillofacial injuries among these athletes is unknown. We report the incidence and trends in maxillofacial injuries among NCAA athletes. Study Design Retrospective study of the NCAA Injury Surveillance System (ISS) representing athletes from seven men's and eight women's sports across Divisions 1, 2, and 3. Incidence of maxillofacial injuries by sport, gender, anatomic location, and injuries requiring surgery were measured. Methods Athlete exposure data from 2004 to 2005 through 2013 to 2014 were analyzed, along with maxillofacial injuries recorded in the NCAA–ISS. Results There were 2,017 injuries recorded, which projects to 41,204 injuries from 202,087,229 athlete events, or 2.04 injuries per 10,000 athlete events (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.68 to 2.40). Women had higher injury rates, 2.06 versus 2.03 (P = 0.016 [95% CI 0.22 to 2.09]). Highest rates were noted in men's wrestling 7.02 (95% CI, 2.84 to 11.19) and men's basketball 4.80 (95% CI, 3.57 to 6.02), and were lowest in women's ice hockey 0.61 (95% CI, 0.17 to 1.06) and women's volleyball 0.43 (95% CI, 0.20 to 0.66). No gender differences in fractures or need for surgery, but men sustained more operative fractures, 27.85% versus 17.04% (P = 0.035 [95% CI, 0.79 to 20.82]). Men's football, women's ice hockey, women's volleyball, and women's gymnastics had consistently low fracture rates. Conclusion Maxillofacial injuries represent approximately 3.4% of all injuries sustained by NCAA athletes. Women had a higher injury rate, whereas men had a higher rate of operative facial fractures. Awareness and improved facial protection, especially among noncontact sports, will be crucial in reducing the incidence of these injuries. Level of Evidence 4. Laryngoscope, 127:1296–1301, 2017
A myriad of surgical approaches to the craniomaxillofacial skeleton exist. Depending on the purpose of the procedure and the anatomic area to be addressed, classically used approaches include coronal approach, midfacial degloving, eyelid incisions, and other cutaneous incisions. Over the last decade, endoscopic approaches have become more popular. Whether external, transoral, or endoscopic, a detailed knowledge of the indications, anatomy, limitations, and potential complications is critical to the successful employment of these approaches. This article reviews the recent literature on classic as well as novel advancements to the craniofacial skeleton.Multiple studies in the last 5 years have investigated the approaches to the craniofacial skeleton. Most of these focus on trauma. Recent advances have concentrated on external versus endoscopic approaches to the mandibular condyle, an endoscopic approach to the midface and orbit, three-dimensional imaging of the facial skeleton, and improving upon the existing classic approaches and techniques.Approaches to the craniomaxillofacial skeleton continue to evolve with the refinement of classic approaches and advent of new technologies and approaches. This study reviews the recent literature and provides a comprehensive review of options for craniofacial exposure and the most up-to-date surgical options.
Objectives: 1) Explain the pros and cons of using arch bars for mandible fracture stabilization. 2) Compare and contrast the outcomes of mandible fractures treated with and without arch bars. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of mandible fractures treated at a Level 1 trauma center between 2001 and 2011. Two‐hundred forty‐two patients met inclusion criteria. Patients were categorized into those treated with or without arch bars. Major complications were malocclusion, infection, and malunion. Independent variables of age, sex, trauma, and dental status were collected. Exclusion criteria included lack of follow‐up, greenstick fractures, mid‐facial fractures, and subcondylar fractures. Data were analyzed using Fisher's exact test. Results: Eighty‐four patients had one mandible fracture, and 158 patients had two fractures. Overall, patients treated with arch bars had a complication rate of 13%, and those treated without arch bars had a rate of 16%. This was statistically insignificant ( P = 0.58). When separated by number of fractures, the differences remained insignificant (12% and 10% complication rates with and without arch bars in single fracture cases ( P = 0.74); 14% and 19% in two fracture cases ( P = 0.37)). Conclusions: The use of arch bars did not have a significant effect on major complications in this series. This trend was consistent for cases of one and two mandible fractures. These data suggest that many patients with mandible fractures may be safely treated without arch bars.
Objectives To explore the effect of e‐prescribing requirements on narcotic dispersion in New York State. Slicer Dicer was used to identify patient records based on CPT codes. Methods We investigated the influence of New York State e‐prescribing requirements on narcotic dispersion following five common facial plastics procedures. Slicer Dicer was used to identify patient records based on CPT codes.We then looked at narcotic prescription rates following those surgeries between March 2014 and March 2018 at an academic institution. Results Overall, between March 2014 and March 2018, 76.1% of the sample received a narcotic prescription following a facial reconstructive plastic surgery. Patients who underwent rhinoplasty were most likely to receive a prescription for postoperative narcotics. The implementation of ISTOP, CPT code, use of non‐narcotic adjuvant, and insurance type were each significantly associated with prescription of postoperative narcotics. Surgery time and age in years were significantly associated with prescription of postoperative narcotics. Ultimately, when controlling for the aforementioned clinical and sociodemographic variables included in the study, those who underwent surgery after the implementation of ISTOP were 42.8% less likely to receive a prescription for postoperative narcotics, aOR = 0.572, 95% CI 0.356, 0.919, p = 0.021. Conclusions New York State's ISTOP program has succeeded in reducing the number of postoperative narcotic prescriptions following facial plastic reconstructive surgeries at this academic institution. However, opioid medications can still be utilized for postoperative analgesia when clinically appropriate. Level of Evidence 3 Laryngoscope , 134:1208–1213, 2024
To determine outcomes of patients with displaced nasal bone fractures after closed nasal reduction (CNR).Retrospective patient review.Review of all patients presenting to the emergency department of a tertiary-care, level 1 trauma hospital with a nasal bone fracture over a 2-year period, followed by telephone survey after CNR.Six hundred seven patients presented to the emergency department in 2015 and 2016 with a diagnosis of nasal bone fracture. Of these, 134 patients met inclusion criteria and underwent CNR without septal reduction. Those with sports-related injuries and those with a septal fracture identified on computed tomography imaging were significantly more likely to undergo CNR. Ninety-one patients completed the post-CNR telephone survey. Over 90% of patients were satisfied with the procedure. However, patients with septal fractures reported worse outcomes, as 53.6% versus 24.1% (P = .0025) disagreed that CNR improved nasal breathing. Of all patients, 11 (2%) eventually underwent septorhinoplasty, with the presence of septal fracture on imaging a significant risk factor.Nasal bone fractures are a common injury, often managed initially with CNR. Patients with septal fractures should be counseled on the high risk of posttraumatic nasal deformity and obstruction despite CNR. In addition, addressing a septal fracture found on imaging may be warranted with either closed septal reduction or early aggressive management given the poorer outcomes seen in the present study. Although these patients are more likely to have definitive treatment, many forego later intervention despite persistent symptoms, emphasizing the need for early intervention or close follow-up.3 Laryngoscope, 129:1784-1790, 2019.
Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common complications following cranioplasty. At our institution, 3D printing has emerged as a popular option for creating customized polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cranioplasty implants that are lower profile than older, non-3D-printed implants. The 3D-printed implants can be integrated, with fixation plates already attached, or nonintegrated, with separate fixation plates available. To our knowledge, no study has analyzed the differences in infection rates between integrated and nonintegrated 3D-printed implants.
Background: The American Society of Plastic Surgeons commissioned the multidisciplinary Performance Measure Development Work Group on Reconstruction after Skin Cancer Resection to identify and draft quality measures for the care of patients undergoing skin cancer reconstruction. Included stakeholders were the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, the American Academy of Dermatology, the American Society of Dermatologic Surgery, the American College of Mohs Surgery, the American Society for Mohs Surgery, and a patient representative. Methods: Two outcome measures and five process measures were identified. The outcome measures included the following: (1) patient satisfaction with information provided by their surgeon before their facial procedure, and (2) postprocedural urgent care or emergency room use. The process measures focus on antibiotic stewardship, anticoagulation continuation and/or coordination of care, opioid avoidance, and verification of clear margins. Results: All measures in this report were approved by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons Quality and Performance Measures Work Group and Executive Committee, and the stakeholder societies. Conclusion: The work group recommends the use of these measures for quality initiatives, Continuing Medical Education, Continuous Certification, Qualified Clinical Data Registry reporting, and national quality reporting programs.
