Tacrolimus (TAC) effectively induces remission in refractory ulcerative colitis (UC). However, TAC therapy usually lasts for 3 months. Although azathioprine (AZA) is often used in maintenance therapy, the relapse rate remains high. Herein, we evaluated the efficacy of adalimumab (ADA) for remission maintenance in patients with UC after induction therapy with TAC.We prospectively enrolled patients with moderate-to-severe UC who achieved clinical remission after 3 months of TAC therapy with endoscopic non-mucosal healing (Cohort A). After TAC discontinuation, the remission maintenance rate up to 1 year after starting ADA therapy was examined. We retrospectively enrolled patients with UC treated with TAC (Cohort B). Among patients in clinical remission after TAC treatment for 3 months, those who received AZA as remission maintenance therapy after TAC discontinuation constituted the AZA group. Patients in Cohort A who received ADA and AZA as remission maintenance therapy after TAC discontinuation constituted the ADA + AZA group. We compared the remission maintenance rates in the AZA and ADA + AZA groups for up to 5 years after TAC discontinuation.In Cohort A, of the 46 patients with UC treated with TAC, 17 were eligible for analysis after receiving ADA as remission maintenance therapy. A notable 88.2% (15/17) were still in remission 1 year after starting ADA. The ADA + AZA group (n = 16) exhibited a significantly higher relapse-free rate than the AZA group (n = 26) (p < 0.05; log-rank test).switching to ADA for remission maintenance in patients with refractory UC who achieved clinical remission with TAC is clinically useful.
A certain number of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) are refractory to anti-TNF-α antibodies; biomarkers are thus needed to predict treatment efficacy. This study aimed to evaluate whether serum biomarkers that were reported to be associated with UC or anti-TNF-α antibody could predict the response to golimumab, a human anti-TNF-α monoclonal antibody, in bio-naïve patients with UC. We prospectively enrolled 23 consecutive patients with UC who were treated with golimumab. Serum samples were collected before the first golimumab dose. Eleven molecules were measured by electrochemiluminescence (ECL) or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and their association with efficacy after 10 weeks of golimumab treatment. Among the serum biomarkers, IL-13 levels were significantly higher in the non-remission group than in the remission group (p = 0.014). IL-15 levels were significantly lower in the non-response group than in the response group (p = 0.04). For clinical remission at week 10, the IL-13 0.20 concentration of pg/mL was associated with a sensitivity and specificity of 82.4% and 83.3%, respectively. Serum IL-13 may be a biomarker to predict golimumab efficacy in biologic-naïve patients with UC, and thus may help to tailor personalized treatment strategies.
Ustekinumab, a new anti-interleukin-12/23 antibody, is an effective treatment for ulcerative colitis; however, data regarding predictive factors of its efficacy are limited. This study aimed to identify biomarkers that can predict the long-term outcome of ustekinumab treatment. We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with active ulcerative colitis treated with ustekinumab at our hospital from June 2020 to January 2023. We divided patients into non-remission and remission groups, and examined whether baseline biomarkers, including C-reactive protein-to-lymphocyte ratio, and early treatment response could predict clinical remission at week 48 of ustekinumab treatment. Of the 33 patients included in the study, 21 (63.6%) were in clinical remission at week 48 of ustekinumab treatment. The baseline C-reactive protein-to-lymphocyte ratio value was identified as an independent prognostic factor for clinical remission at week 48 (odds ratio: 10, 95% confidence interval: 1.6–62.4, p=0.014), with the cutoff value of 3.353 showing excellent prognostic performance (sensitivity: 71.4%, specificity: 83.3%). Furthermore, the clinical response at week 4 (p=0.009) and that at week 8 (p=0.005) were significantly associated with clinical remission at week 48. The baseline C-reactive protein-to-lymphocyte ratio value and early treatment response are useful biomarkers to predict the long-term efficacy of ustekinumab treatment.
Abstract Background Endoscopic mucosal healing serves as a critical predictor for achieving long-term remission in Crohn’s disease treatment. Recent data indicate that the effectiveness of healing varies based on the location of gastrointestinal inflammation. Additionally, reports suggest that antitumor necrosis factor-α (anti-TNF-α) agents exhibit reduced efficacy in treating small intestinal inflammation compared to colorectal inflammation. Conversely, limited research exists regarding the impact of the anti-IL12/23 agent ustekinumab (UST) on small intestinal inflammation. This study aimed to compare the effects of anti-TNF-α agents and UST on small intestinal inflammation using propensity score analysis. Methods This retrospective observational study involved 70 patients with Crohn’s disease who had inflammation in the small intestine and had initiated treatment with either anti-TNF agents or UST between March 2015 and August 2021. Endoscopic findings were evaluated before treatment commencement and at 1–2 years post-treatment initiation. The propensity score was employed to compare the efficacy of TNF agents and UST on small bowel inflammation. Results Ustekinumab exhibited greater improvement in the small intestinal endoscopy score than anti-TNF-α antibodies according to the propensity score analysis (inverse probability weighting; P = .0448). However, no significant disparity was observed in the overall improvement of endoscopic scores between UST and anti-TNF-α antibodies (P = .5938). Conclusions This study suggests that UST might be more effective than anti-TNF-α agents in treating small intestinal inflammation in Crohn’s disease.
Fluoropyrimidines (FPs) are key drugs in many chemotherapy regimens; however, recipients are often prone to diarrhea due to gastrointestinal toxicity. Disruption of the intestinal epithelial barrier function by FPs leads to dysbiosis, which may exacerbate intestinal epithelial cell damage as a secondary effect and trigger diarrhea. However, despite studies on chemotherapy-induced changes in the intestinal microbiome of humans, the relationship between dysbiosis and diarrhea is unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between chemotherapy-induced diarrhea and the intestinal microbiome.We conducted a single-center prospective observational study. Twenty-three patients who received chemotherapy, including FPs as first-line chemotherapy for colorectal cancer, were included. Stool samples were collected before the start of chemotherapy and after one cycle of treatment to analyze intestinal microbiome composition and perform PICRUSt predictive metagenomic analysis.Gastrointestinal toxicity was observed in 7 of 23 patients (30.4%), diarrhea was observed in 4 (17.4%), and nausea and anorexia were observed in 3 (13.0%). In 19 patients treated with oral FPs, the α diversity of the microbial community decreased significantly following chemotherapy only in the diarrheal group. At the phylum level, the diarrheal group showed a significant decrease in the abundance of Firmicutes and a significant increase in the abundance of Bacteroidetes with chemotherapy (p = 0.013 and 0.011, respectively). In the same groups, at the genus level, Bifidobacterium abundance was significantly decreased (p = 0.019). In contrast, in the non-diarrheal group, Actinobacteria abundance increased significantly with chemotherapy at the phylum level (p = 0.011). Further, Bifidobacterium, Fusicatenibacter, and Dorea abundance significantly increased at the genus level (p = 0.006, 0.019, and 0.011, respectively). The PICRUSt predictive metagenomic analysis revealed that chemotherapy caused significant differences in membrane transport in KEGG pathway level 2 and in 8 KEGG pathway level 3, including transporters and oxidative phosphorylation in the diarrhea group.Organic-acid-producing bacteria seem to be involved in diarrhea associated with chemotherapy, including FPs.
A considerable number of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who initially respond to golimumab (GLM), an anti-TNF-α antibody, gradually lose clinical response. Therapeutic drug monitoring has been proposed to optimize serum anti-TNF-α antibody concentrations before the loss of response; however, little is known about ideal serum GLM concentrations. We aimed to evaluate whether the serum GLM trough levels (TLs) early after the initiation of induction therapy affect the long-term outcomes in UC and to identify the early GLM TLs that should be targeted for better long-term outcomes.Thirty-one patients were prospectively evaluated. The primary outcome was clinical remission at 54 weeks, and we measured the serum GLM TLs at weeks 6, 10, and 14. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to identify optimal GLM TL thresholds early after induction therapy that were associated with clinical remission at week 54.The GLM TL at week 14, but not at weeks 6 or 10, was significantly associated with clinical remission at week 54 (median [IQR] 1.6 [1.3-1.6] μg/mL vs. 0.9 [0.6-1.3] μg/mL; p = 0.04). The area under the ROC curve for GLM TLs at week 14 was 0.78. We identified a week-14 GLM TL of 1.1 μg/mL as the target threshold for achieving clinical remission at week 54.Our results demonstrate the value of early serum GLM TLs in predicting the long-term outcomes of GLM for patients with UC.
Ustekinumab, a new anti-interleukin-12/23 antibody, is an effective treatment for ulcerative colitis; however, data regarding predictive factors of its efficacy are limited. Predicting treatment efficacy in advance would be useful for selecting a therapeutic agent. This study aimed to identify biomarkers that can predict the long-term outcome of ustekinumab treatment.
