Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae (sDAVFs) are rare entities with delayed diagnosis, potentially dramatic clinical manifestations, and complex management. We aim to present our mini case series and perform an updated systematic review of the usual patient profile, to search for established prognostic factors, to compare the effectiveness and safety of surgical and endovascular intervention, and to discuss trends in therapeutic strategy. We retrospectively collected data from patients treated in our department in the last decade (2014-2024) and we systematically reviewed the literature according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) criteria and searched the PubMed database for relevant articles published in the same period. Epidemiologic data, imaging modalities, prognostic factors, and treatment modalities were assessed. Firstly, we identified four illustrative cases from our institution. In addition, our search yielded 559 studies and our review included 82 original studies. 3130 patients were identified (mean age 61; male-to-female ratio 3:1). Most commonly, the fistula level was in the thoracic spine (65%). Surgery was provided to 1837 patients (1213 as primary treatment) and embolism to 1085 (932 as primary treatment). Initial fistula occlusion rate and recurrence rate were 98.1% and 1.9% for surgery and 71.1% and 9.6% for embolism, respectively. No difference between the two modalities with respect to clinical outcome was observed. SDAVFs remain a challenge for neurosurgeons concerning both diagnosis and management. Surgery remains superior to embolism with respect to success as an initial treatment. Embolism can be offered if certain contraindications do not coexist. All symptomatic patients should be offered treatment, whereas asymptomatic patients could be conservatively managed only if the close patient follow-up can be secured.
Eighteen patients with posttraumatic paraplegia were examined myelographically at 2 months to 30 years after the injury, and the findings correlated with surgical exploration. The following six myelographic patterns were seen: 1) tethered cord and subarachnoid adhesions; 2) proximal cord cysts; 3) loculated subarachnoid cysts; 4) proximal cord atrophy; 5) extradural fibrosis; and 6) complete obliteration of the subarachnoid space at the level of trauma due to extradural fibrosis and/or bone encroachment on the vertebral canal. Myelography with or without computerized tomography (CT) accurately reflected the gross pathological process. The examination is indicated prior to surgical intervention: the structural lesion in four patients extended two or more vertebral levels above the site of the original bone injury and was not easily predictable preoperatively. When combined with CT, myelography allowed evaluation of the transverse anatomy of the vertebral canal and its contents; it was especially useful when the canal was narrowed or distorted by bone and soft tissue. Water-soluble contrast media provided a more detailed evaluation of the spinal cord and subarachnoid space, and were the preferred agents. If a posttraumatic syrinx is suspected, these are the agents of choice.
