Background: Sirolimus is an antibiotic with antifungal, antifibrotic and immunosuppressant properties that has been used in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) as substitute of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) in cases of de novo tumors, patients subjected to OLT for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and nephrotoxicity due to CNI. We present our experience with sirolimus monotherapy in OLT Patients and methods: Between April 1986 and December 2010 we performed 1500 OLT, of whom 57 patients are receiving immunosuppressive treatment with sirolimus, and 39 of them are currently in monotherapy. We analized the clinical characteristics of patients, associated side effects, rejection rate, renal function and lipid profile, in patients treated with sirolimus monotherapy. Results: There were 31 males (79.5%), and 8 females (20.5%) with a mean age at OLT of 50.5 ±10.5 years. The mean follow-up period was 89.8 months. The main indications for OLT was alcoholic cirrhosis in 10 patients (25.6%), HCV cirrhosis in 5 (12.8%), and HCV cirrhosis+HCC in 5 (12.8%). Other causes were HBV cirrhosis, acute liver failure, autoimmune hepatitis. The most frequently immusosuppressive therapy used at discharge was tacrolimus+prednisone in 25 patients (64.1%). Premonotherapy immunosuppression most frequently used was tacrolimus+sirolimus in 21 patients (53.9%), and mycophenolate+sirolimus in 15 (38.5%). The mean time from OLT to sirolimus monotherapy treatment initiation was 65.3 months, and the mean follow-up after switching to sirolimus monotherapy was 22.8 months. Only 1 patient (2.6%) presented acute rejection, being with adequate drug levels, and treated with reintroduction of tacrolimus. The indications for conversion to sirolimus monotherapy were: de novo aerodigestive tract tumors in 11 patients (28.3%), HCC in 10 (25.6%), nephrotoxicity due to CNI in 5 (12.8%), skin malignacies in 4 (10.3%), lymphoproliferative disorders in 3 (7.7%), urologic tract tumors in 3 (7.7%), central nervous system tumors in 2 (5%) and gynecological in 1 patient (2.6%). Adverse effects developed in 35 patients (89.7%) and the most frequent were: dyslipidemia in 24 patients (61.5%), edemas in 8 (20.5%), and cytopenias in 8 (20.5%). The mean creatinine clearance rate (CCL) before sirolimus therapy was 69.9 ml/min (normal kidney function in 30.8% of patients, mild renal insufficiency in 48.7%, and moderate in 20.5%); and after monotherapy was 75.3 ml/min (normal kidney function in 38.5% of patients, mild renal insufficiency in 41%, moderate in 18%, and severe in 2.6%) (p=0.0001). Total cholesterol and trigliceride values increased significantly after switching: cholesterol 171 mg/dl vs 208 mg/dl (p=0.002); and trigliceride 108 mg/dl vs 158 mg/dl (p=0.015). Seventeen patients were treated with hypolipemiant drugs. Conclusions: Sirolimus monotherapy is a good immunosuppressive option in patients who underwent OLT for HCC or those who develop de novo tumors or nephrotoxicity due to CNI. Monotherapy is well tolerated and is associated with low rejection rate. Renal function improves after conversion to sirolimus monotherapy and dyslipidemia is pharmacologically well controlled.
Background: Sirolimus is a macrocyclic antibiotic with antifungal, antifibrotic and immunosuppressive properties that can inhibit metastatic tumor growth and angiogenesis in vivo mouse models. It can be used as a substitute for calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) because it may reduces the likelihood of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or the rate of de novo tumors in high risk transplant patients. Sirolimus protects allografts from rejection while simultaneously inhibits tumor growth. Patients and methods: Between April 1986 and December 2010 we performed 1500 orthotopic liver transplants (OLT). Fifty-seven patients received immunosuppressive treatment with sirolimus, and 26 patients of them due to de novo tumors. Currently, 20 of these patients are with sirolimus monotherapy. We analyze the outcome of liver transplant recipients who developed de novo tumors and were treated with sirolimus monotherapy. Results: There were 20 patients (18 males and 2 females), with a mean age at OLT of 50.3±12.1 years, and mean follow-up of 111.5 months. The main indications for OLT were alcoholic cirrhosis (40%), and HCV cirrhosis (15%). The most frequently immunosuppressive therapy used at discharge was tacrolimus+prednisone (55%). Premonoterapy immunosuppression most frequently used was tacrolimus+sirolimus (50%), and mycophenolate+sirolimus (40%). The mean time from OLT to sirolimus treatment was 74.6 months, and from then until the beginning of monotherapy was 9.5 months with a mean time of 24.7 months in monotherapy. The location of de novo tumors was: aerodigestive tract (45%), skin (20%), lymphoproliferative disorders (15%), urologic tract (10%), gynecological (5%), and central nervous system (5%). There was only one case of rejection (5%) in the presence of adequate drug levels, successfully treated with reintroduction of tacrolimus. Adverse effects were seen in 80% of patients, and the most frequent were: dyslipidemia (11 patients), edema (5 patients), and oral thrush (4 patients). Regarding lipid profile, mean cholesterol value before sirolimus was 168 mg/dl, and postmonotherapy was 211 mg/dl (p =0.0001). Seven patients are treated with hypolipemiant. Mean value of pre-sirolimus triglycerides was 104 mg/dl and post-monotherapy was 130 mg/dl (p=0.071). Regarding renal function, mean creatinine clearance pre-sirolimus was 70.6 ml/min and post-monotherapy was 75.6 ml/min (p>0.05). Conclusions: Sirolimus is a potent immunosuppressant with antitumoral properties, with low rate of rejection, which represents a good option OLT with de novo malignancies. More than half of the patients presented side effects, but they were well tolerated or controlled with medical treatment (dyslipidemia as the most frequent). There was an improvement of renal function showing an increase in creatinine clearance.
Abstract Pediatric patients with irreversible intestinal failure present a significant challenge to meet the nutritional needs that promote growth. From 2002 to 2013, 13 living‐related small intestinal transplantations were performed in 10 children, with a median age of 18 months. Grafts included isolated living‐related intestinal transplantation (n=7), and living‐related liver and small intestine (n=6). The immunosuppression protocol consisted of induction with thymoglobulin and maintenance therapy with tacrolimus and steroids. Seven of 10 children are currently alive with a functioning graft and good quality of life. Six of the seven children who are alive have a follow‐up longer than 10 years. The average time to initiation of oral diet was 32 days (range, 13‐202 days). The median day for ileostomy takedown was 77 (range, 18‐224 days). Seven children are on an oral diet, and one of them is on supplements at night through a g‐tube. We observed an improvement in growth during the first 3 years post‐transplant and progressive weight gain throughout the first year post‐transplantation. Growth catch‐up and weight gain plateaued after these time periods. We concluded that living donor intestinal transplantation potentially offers a feasible, alternative strategy for long‐term treatment of irreversible intestinal failure in children.
Infectious vascular complications affecting transplant recipients may lead to severe morbidity and graft loss. This is a retrospective review of vascular repair with bovine pericardial patch (BPP) in infected fields for immunosuppressed patients. BPP was used as either a patch or an interposition graft. Five cases of arterial reconstruction in infected fields using BPP were performed. There were no complications related to bleeding, thrombosis, or recurrent infection. In our limited experience, the use of BPP as a vascular patch is successful, and it represents an alternative when vascular reconstruction is needed in the context of infected fields.