The urgency for criminal justice system reconstruction of the corruption is given the legal gap in eradicating corruption law if it is only carried out by the Regional Corruption Court, which is domiciled in the Capital Province. Because the Corruption Court’s working area is so broad, it is because many corruption cases to be tried, it will also require large fees and a large number of judges, and ideally, it will take a long time in the process of examining. Meanwhile, on the other hand, there is an obligation for the corruption case settlement by the Corruption Court to be carried out quickly, simply and at low cost. This paper’s problems are: (a) Why is it important to reconstruct the Corruption Criminal Justice System? (b) What is the ideal construction of the Corruption Criminal Justice System to support national development in Indonesia? The research method is qualitative with juridical normative and sociological approaches, especially in collecting primary data to reconstruct the corruption criminal justice system. This research shows that the ideal construction of the corruption court system is to support National Development, namely the relative competence of the Regional Corruption Court, which is not limited by the administrative area of a province. The Republic of Indonesia’s administrative area consists of various Provinces and Regencies/Cities. In these conditions, ideally, the relative competence of a Corruption Court can also examine corruption cases in districts/cities close to the Corruption Court, even though they are located in a different province from the domicile of a Corruption Court.
Online Dispute Resolution telah menjadi terobosan baru di dunia hukum, terutama
dalam hukum penyelesaian sengketa. Online Dispute Resolution digunakan dalam
beberapa sengketa seperti sengketa e-commerce dan nama domain. Secara teknis,
bagian dari ODR telah digunakan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Indonesia, di mana
Mahkamah Konstitusi Indonesia memanfaatkan fasilitas video conference dalam
mendengarkan kesaksian saksi dan pendapat para ahli.
Saat ini, Online Dispute Resolution telah digunakan oleh berbagai organisasi
dunia seperti UNCITRAL, European Commission, WIPO Arbitration and
Mediation. PANDI (Pengelola Nama Domain Internet Indonesia) sebagai salah
satu pihak yang menggunakan Online Dispute Resolution hanya memiliki
kebijakan nasional yang ditetapkan berdasarkan peraturan internasional yang ada,
namun telah diterapkan dalam beberapa kasus dan menghasilkan keputusan yang
mengikat para pihak.
Metode yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini adalah metode yuridis empiris,
dimana metode yuridis digunakan adalah analisis peraturan internasional dan
nasional, sedangkan metode empiris yang digunakan adalah wawancara yang
dilakukan dengan beberapa panelis dan staf PANDI. Data yang telah diperoleh
diolah kemudian dianalisis menggunakan analisis deskriptif kualitatif.
Hasil penelitian dan pembahasan menunjukkan perbandingan Online Dispute
Resolution dalam perselisihan nama domain internasional yang diwakili oleh
WIPO Arbitration and Mediation dan PANDI yang sama-sama menggunakan
UDRP dan The Rules sebagai dasar hukum. Hingga saat ini, PANDI telah
memiliki kebijakan nasional yang disebut “kebijakan” yang terdiri dari 8
kebijakan mengenai nama domain, termasuk kebijakan penyelesaian sengketa
nama domain. PANDI menggunakan Online Dispute Resolution dalam membuat
keputusan yang final dan mengikat, namun PANDI tetap berada di bawah
pengadilan Republik Indonesia, sehingga para pihak dapat mengajukan banding
kepada pengadilan Republik Indonesia.
Keywords: Online Dispute Resolution, Nama Domain, Penyelesaian Sengketa.
abstraThe Online Dispute Resolution has become a new breakthrough in the world of
law, especially the law of dispute settlement. Online Dispute Resolution is used in
several disputes such as e-commerce disputes and domain name. Technically, part
of the ODR has been used by Indonesia's Constitutional Court, where the
Indonesian Constitutional Court utilizes video conference facilities in listening to
witness testimonies and expert opinions.
Currently, Online Dispute Resolution has been used by various world
organizations including UNCITRAL, European Commission, and WIPO
Arbitration and Mediation. PANDI (Pengelola Nama Domain Internet Indonesia)
as one of the parties that utilize the online dispute resolution has policies which
established under existing international regulations, but the ODR has been
applied in some cases and resulted binding decisions to the parties.
The method that used in this writing is the juridical empiric method, where the
juridical method used in the analysis of international and national regulations.
The empirical method used in an interview method conducted with several
panelists and PANDI staff. Data have been obtained processed then analyzed
using decriptive qualitative analysis.
The results and discussion of this study show comparison of the Online Dispute
Resolution in international domain name dispute represented by WIPO
Arbitration and Mediation and PANDI which both use UDRP and The Rules as
the legal basis. PANDI already has a national policy called “Policy” which
contains 8 policies on domain names, including domain name dispute resolution
policy. PANDI uses Online Dispute Resolution to create final and binding
decisions, but PANDI remains under the court of the Republic of Indonesia, so the
parties may submit an appeal to the court of the Republic of Indonesia.
Keywords: Online Dispute Resolution, Domain Names, Dispute Settlement.ct
The development of technologies brings immense change to various aspects in the life of modern society.Including the field of law that always follows the development of society, where the dynamics of the development of society help to bring modern legal reform in this case everything always using technologies. The use of technologies also penetrates up to the alternative dispute resolution pattern which begins to develop well. One of the impacts of technologies in the field of law can be seen from the creation of Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) also called as Internet Dispute Resolution (iDR), or also Electronic Dispute Resolution (eDR), Electronic ADR (sADR) till Online ADR (oADR). Basically, ODR has long been adopted by the west countries, like ICANN and European Commission. Indonesia itself is new to know the online dispute resolution or bias is called an online dispute resolution alternative. Why so, it is because there is no legal regulations that truly regulates the Online Dispute Resolution. Indonesia only has a few rules that discuss about ADR only, not with the online ADR. However the electronic or e –commerce transaction sites have long been implemented an online dispute resolution system to address disputes between the buyers/client and the sellers/dealers. Similarly PANDI uses an online dispute resolution system to resolve domain name disputes. When Indonesia has implemented an ODR system in its settlement disputes, so it’s certain that every dispute can be settled in concise, light cost and not waste a lot of time. We can imagine when the proof in court can be done at home through e-mail system, the execution of the court using video conference, as well as the court fees are awarded via transfer.
The Online Dispute Resolution has become a breakthrough in the world of law, especially the law of dispute settlement. Online Dispute Resolution is used in several disputes such as e-commerce disputes and domain name. Technically, part of the ODR has been used by Indonesia’s Constitutional Court, where the Indonesian Constitutional Court utilizes video conferencing facilities in listening to witness testimonies and expert opinions. Moreover, PANDI (Pengelola Nama Domain Indonesia) has implemented most of the functions of the ODR in resolving Domain Name disputes in Indonesia like one of the cases that has been resolved, we call as “Netflix.id” Case that is the case of the Netflix Company who has used Netflix’s name as merchandise since 1977. Netflix Company knowing that there is a new domain name that uses the name of the item, namely “Netflix.id” is officially registered and this interferes with the trading of the Netflix Company, with the result that Netflix Company filed a lawsuit to namely removing the “Netflix.id” domain name. This case was resolved without going through a face to face PPND Process (Pedoman Perselisihan Nama Domain) as a legal basis under Indonesian legislation Currently. Online Dispute Resolution has been used by various world organizations including UNCITRAL, European Commission, and WIPO Arbitration and Mediation. PANDI (Pengelola Nama Domain Internet Indonesia) as one of the parties that utilize the online dispute resolution has policies established under existing international regulations. Still, the ODR has been applied in some cases and resulted in binding decisions to the parties.
Juvenile delinquency in Indonesia is increasingly alarming; this also affects the number of child prisoners that are increasing their prison years. For this reason, the program for fostering children in prisons also requires special attention from the government. Drawing in the empirical studies and descriptive data and document, the findings show that children at teenagers prisons or Youth Detention Center (YDC) get formal education but not optimal yet. This study focuses on why formal education in prisons is not optimal, and trying to find solutions or alternative policies so that children incarcerated in YDC have the opportunity to get formal education equivalent to other children in accordance with the Law National Education System for the implementation of education in Indonesia and the Child Criminal Justice System for organizing development activities at YDC.
