Abstract Immune related adverse events (irAEs) from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are well documented for nearly every organ system, except for the reproductive system. Mouse models have demonstrated that ICIs can decrease ovarian follicular reserve and impair oocyte maturation, which may have implications for fertility (PMID: 36008687). There are no studies investigating the effect of ICIs on fertility in humans. We sought to evaluate ovarian function in women treated with ICIs compared to untreated women by evaluating non-invasive surrogate markers of ovarian reserve, anti-müllerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle counts (AFC). We enrolled women 18 - 40 years old diagnosed with stage III or IV melanoma. Participants underwent phlebotomy for AMH levels and a pelvic ultrasound to assess AFC. The medical record was retrospectively reviewed to obtain data on patient characteristics, treatments, and outcomes. A total of 14 patients with stage IIIA - IV melanoma participated. Six patients received ICI treatment before AMH and AFC testing while 8 had no prior ICI exposure. The ICI group ages ranged from 22-40 years with a median age of 31 years. The untreated group ages ranged from 25-39 years with a median age of 32 years. The time between starting an ICI and enrolling in the study ranged from 28 - 351 days. ICI regimens included ipilimumab/nivolumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab (on a clinical trial). Four of these six patients experienced an irAE during their course, including: dermatitis, hepatitis, colitis, thyroid dysfunction, and adrenal insufficiency. Median AMH levels were lower for patients treated with ICIs (2.9 vs 4.0 ng/mL), as was median AFC (22.5 vs 23.5 ng/mL). Only three patients’ clinicians discussed fertility preservation. None of the patients underwent fertility preservation. Our study found lower AMH and AFC in women with melanoma who were treated with an ICI compared to untreated women. Although AMH and AFC are surrogate markers for ovarian reserve and fertility, and our study is a small cohort, these early results suggest that ICIs may impact ovarian function. Age is less likely to be a confounding factor as the median age of the treated group was younger than the untreated group. While these results are preliminary, when considered in conjunction with recent pre-clinical data showing changes within the ovaries after ICI treatment, fertility consultation should be considered for young women prior to ICI initiation. We are investigating associations between AMH, AFC, age, ICI exposure, and future pregnancies in an ongoing prospective study. Citation Format: Ashley Hickman, Katherine Smith, Zaraq Khan, Elizabeth Ann Enninga, Yulian Zhao, Elizabeth Cathcart-Rake, Haidong Dong, Lisa Kottschade, Svetomir Markovic, Heather Montane, Anastasios Dimou, Yiyi Yan. Investigating the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) on ovarian function in young patients with melanoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 6644.
Large granular lymphocyte (LGL) leukemia is a chronic clonal lymphoproliferative disorder. Here, a T-LGL leukemia patient developed NK-LGL leukemia with residual leukemic T-LGL. TCRVβ usage and CDR3 sequence drifts were observed with disease progression. A STAT3 S614R mutation was identified in NK but not T-cells in the mixed leukemic stage. Multiple, non-dominant T-cell clones with distinct STAT3 mutations were present throughout. Our results suggest that T and NK-LGL leukemia may share common pathogenesis mechanisms and that STAT3 mutation alone is insufficient to bring about clonal expansion. Mutational and immunological monitoring may provide diagnostic and therapeutic significance in LGL leukemia.
Pre-clinical studies of Sofusa® DoseConnect™ (DC) have shown that IL infusion of antineoplastic medications results in higher lymph node concentrations, more efficient tumor growth inhibition and less systemic exposure when compared to conventional systemic administration. We conducted a Phase I clinical trial to assess the safety of IL infusion of ipilimumab with DC followed by nivolumab IV in patients with advanced melanoma.
Methods
A 3+3 phase I clinical trial was conducted to assess the safety of IL infusion of IPI by DC over 12-24 hours followed by NIVO 3 mg/kg IV among patients with advanced melanoma. A maximum of four 21 day cycles were administered. Cycle 1 IPI was administered by DC; cycles 2-4 IPI were administered at 1 mg/kg IV. Dose levels (DL) of cycle 1 IPI included: DL1: 1 mg/kg; DL-1: 0.75 mg/kg; and DL-2: 0.5 mg/kg. All DL were given at 0.5 mL/hour. Dose limiting toxicities included the following if they were at least possibly related to DC: inability to administer at least 75% of the protocol-specified dose due to DC dislodgement, ≥ grade 4 hematologic toxicity, ≥ grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity or ≥ grade 3 infusion site reaction or infusion related reaction that does not resolve to Grade 0-1 within 2 weeks. IPI pharmacokinetics were characterized in all patients who participated in the study.
Results
Six patients (3 males and 3 females) were enrolled in this trial at DL1. The median number of prior therapies for metastatic disease was 1 (range 1-3). The most common sites of metastatic disease were distant lymph nodes and lung. No dose limiting toxicities were observed. Cycle 1 toxicities reported included grade 2 hypophysitis (N=1) and grade 2 abdominal pain (N=1). No adjustments to the DC flow rate were required. Two severe, DC unrelated, immune-related toxicities were reported: grade 3 maculopapular rash and grade 3 colitis (same patient, cycle 1 causing discontinuation). Four patients progressed on treatment (1-cycle 2; 3-cycle 4). One patient completed 4 cycles of treatment. The mean IPI serum concentrations at the end of the infusion and 15 days after the DC infusion in Cycle 1 were 4.13 ug/mL and 4.88 ug/mL, respectively.
Conclusions
IL administration of IPI with the DC device on the first cycle was well tolerated with no dose limiting toxicities. Safety and secondary efficacy of IL infusion of IPI through all 4 cycles will be assessed next.
Trial Registration
ClinicalTrials. gov: NCT04967196
Ethics Approval
This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of Mayo Clinic.
Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.
Abstract Seven different anti-PD-1 and PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies are now widely used in the US to treat a variety of cancer types, but there have been no clinical trials comparing them directly. Furthermore, because many of these antibodies do not cross react between mouse and human proteins, no preclinical models exist in which to consider these types of questions. Thus, we produced humanized PD-1 and PD-L1 mice in which the extracellular domains of both mouse PD-1 and PD-L1 were replaced with the corresponding human sequences. Using this new model, we sought to compare the strength of the immune response generated by FDA-approved antibodies. To do this, we performed an in vivo T cell priming assay in which anti-PD-1/L1 therapies were given at the time of T cell priming against surrogate tumor antigen (OVA), followed by subsequent B16-OVA tumor challenge. We found that anti-PD-1/L1-treated mice exhibited significantly better tumor rejection than controls, although both the control and antibody-treated mice generated comparable numbers of OVA-specific T cells at the time of priming. To determine what could mediate this strong antitumor immune response, we identified the increased production of CX3CR1 + PD-1 + CD8 + cytotoxic T cells in the anti-PD-1/L1-treated mice, the same subset of effector T cells known to increase in clinical responders to PD-1/L1 therapy. Thus, our model permits the direct comparison of FDA-approved anti-PD-1/L1 monoclonal antibodies and further correlates successful tumor rejection with the level of CX3CR1 + PD-1 + CD8 + T cells, making this model a critical tool for future studies to optimize and better utilize anti-PD-1/L1 therapeutics.
Introduction:IL-15 has been used in clinical trials with PD-1 antibody to overcome cancer resistance to PD-1 monotherapy in cancer patients. However, it is not clear what T cell population would be expanded to mediate tumor control in IL-15 in combination with PD-1 antibody. We recently found CX3CR1+ cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, which increased in responders compared with non-responders after anti-PD-1 in melanoma patients, demonstrated an increased transcription of CD122 (IL2RB). Since CD122 is a subunit of IL-15 receptor, we hypothesized that IL-15 in combination with anti-PD-1 therapy may have the ability to expand CX3CR1+ cytotoxic CD8+ T cells for tumor control.Methods and findings:To examine whether IL-15 plus anti-PD-1 expand CX3CR1+ cytotoxic CD8+ T cells in tumor tissues, we treated tumor-bearing mice with IL-15/IL-15Rα complexes alone or with PD-1 antibody and measured the frequency of CX3CR1+Granzyme B+ CD8+ T cells. As only the combination therapy induced dramatic tumor regression, we found the highest increase of CX3CR1+Granzyme B+ CD8 T cells in tumor tissues in the group treated with IL-15 plus anti-PD-1 (28.87±3.19% vs. 7.91±1.32%, p<0.01) compared with groups treated with either IL-15 alone or anti-PD-1 alone. In contrast to wild type mice, IL-15 plus anti-PD-1 did not suppress tumor growth in CX3CR1-KO mice. To determine whether IL-15 alone can also expand human CX3CR1+ cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, we cultured peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from healthy donors (n = 5) with IL-15 for 24 hours in vitro. We found IL-15 (5 ng/mL) only modestly increased the frequency of CX3CR1+ Granzyme B+ CD8+ T cells than those cultured with no IL-15 (39.9±6.44% vs. 27.56±4.98%). To test whether this increase is due to enhanced proliferation of this subset of CD8+ T cells, we measured the expression of Ki-67, a cell proliferative marker, in CX3CR1+ CD8+ T cells by intranuclear staining. We found IL-15 modestly induced more proliferating CX3CR1+ CD8+ T cells in vitro culture compared with control group without IL-15 (6.25±0.54% vs. 0.91±0.25%).Summary:Taken together, we found IL-15 combined with anti-PD-1 therapy has the ability to significantly expand CX3CR1+ cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, however IL-15 alone may have limited ability to significantly expand this effector cell population. Our studies provide a new rational for combination therapy of IL-15 and PD-1 antibody to overcome cancer resistance for patients who did not respond to initial PD-1 therapy.Citation Format: Henan Zhang, Xin Liu, Siyu Cao, Lingling Chen, Susan Harrington, Ying Li, Aaron Mansfield, Sean Park, Yiyi Yan, Roxana Dronca, Haidong Dong. Expansion of CX3CR1+ cytotoxic CD8+ T cells provides a rationale for IL-15 in combination cancer therapy with PD-1 antibody [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4080.
