Abstract Background Curbside consultation is a ubiquitous practice within the medical field informally providing advice to community providers. The electronic consult (E-Consult) allows direct provider-to-provider communication between the primary care provider (PCP) and specialists using a secure electronic platform while documenting these interactions within the patient’s medical record (EMR). They offer PCP’s a forum for asking nonurgent questions. For the specialist, it allows review of the EMR, reduces medical liability of the curbside consult and provides a mechanism for generating RVUs. This service was implemented in our healthcare network (of over 300 pediatricians and pediatric specialists who see more than 500,000 pediatric visits each year) in April 2018. Our aim was to review and analyze the E-consults provided by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases (PID) service. Methods Cross-sectional study of E-consults performed by the PID from April 11 -2018-April 22 2019. Clinical queries were categorized by type and tabulated. Consult Billing was as following: Level 1=5 minutes (min); Level 2 =10min; Level 3= 15 minutes; Level 4= 25 minutes. RVU values were institutionally derived and assigned. Results We performed 171 E- consults with an average of 13 per month (range 3–18) generated from 59 providers (52 (88%) physicians and 7 (12%) certified nurse practitioners). Common reasons for the E-consult included: vaccine questions (25.7%), diagnosis questions (21.6%), exposure questions (20.4%) and treatment recommendations (10.5%). Of vaccine questions, 43% related to vaccine schedules /boosters, 13% vaccines for travel and 11.3% vaccines for the immunocompromised host. Consultation in the PID clinic was recommended for 25.7% patients, 9% requiring urgent evaluation. Of the 171 E-consults, 12.2% were evaluated in the PID clinic and 5% by another specialty. Billing was performed for 168 of the E consults= 9 level 1, 35 level 2, 83 level 3 and 41 level 4 generating 161 RVUs (equivalent to 53 level 4 new outpatient visits at our institution). Conclusion E-consults are an alternative to informal curbside consults for nonurgent clinical queries. Encounters are documented in the EMR and professional effort devoted to the task is tracked providing an additional source of RVU generation for the PID physician. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.
Background: Lack of access to timely, detailed antibiotic use data has limited ambulatory antibiotic stewardship efforts. Antibiotic utilization is tracked across ambulatory care sites and emergency departments (ED) within a large integrated health system. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort analysis from June 1, 2019 to May 31, 2020 comparing antibiotic prescribing for all patients with ICD-10 diagnosis codes for cystitis, otitis media, pharyngitis, sinusitis, and upper respiratory tract infections (URTIs) among five ambulatory care departments across northeast Ohio and southeast Florida locations: ED, Urgent Care (UC), On-Demand Telehealth (TEL), Pediatrics (PED), and Primary Care (PC). Results: A total of 261,947 encounters were included (ED:56,766, UC:92,749, TEL:8,783, PED:29,151, PC:74,498) for the treatment of cystitis (30,932), otitis media (22,094), pharyngitis (59,964), sinusitis (53,693), or URTI (95,264). The population was 63% female with a median age of 34.2 years [12.8-56.3]. A total of 17% of patients had documented penicillin allergies and 18% of patients with pharyngitis received Group A Streptococcus (GAS) testing. Antibiotics were prescribed in 44% of encounters (ED:21,746 [38%], UC:45,652 [49%], TEL:4,622 [53%], PED:10,909 [37%], PC:33,547 [45%]; P < 0.001). Guideline concordant antibiotics were prescribed in 65% of encounters (ED:14,338 [66%], UC:31,532 [69%], TEL:3,869 [84%], PED:8,212 [75%], PC:17,263 [51%]; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Observed rates of antibiotic and guideline concordant antibiotic prescribing were similar to national published rates of antibiotic prescribing in the ambulatory setting. The variability in antibiotic prescribing demonstrates opportunities for targeted outpatient stewardship efforts. Timely antibiotic tracking tools can facilitate ambulatory antimicrobial stewardship activities.
1. Heather L. Daniels, DO*
2. Camille Sabella, MD*
1. *Center for Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Cleveland Clinic Children’s, Cleveland, OH
* Abbreviations:
CDC: : Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
DTaP: : diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis vaccine
DTwP: : diphtheria, tetanus, and whole cell pertussis vaccine
IHPS: : infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis
PCR: : polymerase chain reaction
Tdap: : tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis vaccine
Th: : T-helper
After completing this article, readers should be able to:
Bordetella pertussis is a fastidious gram-negative coccobacillus responsible for the respiratory infection commonly known as “whooping cough.” The organism is spread by respiratory droplets and is highly contagious among close contacts. The typical incubation period is 7 to 10 days, but it may be as long as 21 days. Neither natural infection nor pertussis vaccination results in long-lasting immunity, contributing to endemic infection and 3- to 5-year cycles of pertussis epidemics.
Several active components, which play a role in immunity and are responsible for the organism’s ability to cause disease, are produced by B pertussis . (1) Pertussis toxin, filamentous hemagglutinin, pertactin, and agglutinogen allow the organism to adhere to ciliated epithelium of the respiratory tract, where it exerts its effects. Pertussis toxin also induces cell cytoxicity, inhibits neutrophilic and monocytic responses, and delays induction of specific immune responses. Pertussis toxin is postulated to be responsible for the systemic manifestations of pertussis, …
Abstract E-consults replace “curbside” interactions, facilitate provider–specialist communication, document within the medical record, and track relative value units (RVUs). Pediatric infectious diseases (PID) E-consults commonly relate to vaccines, exposures, diagnoses, and treatments. The documented RVU effort of 197 consecutive PID E-consults was equivalent to 70 level 4 new outpatient consults.
ABSTRACT Background Vaccinating pediatric solid organ transplant candidates against measles and varicella is crucial due to the risk of severe disease in immunosuppressed recipients and general avoidance of live virus vaccines post‐transplantation. The world saw a resurgence of measles starting 2012 prompting the American Society of Transplantation in 2015 to release guidelines on recognition, prevention, and post‐exposure prophylaxis of this disease in solid transplant recipients. This study aims to assess the extent of incomplete immunity to these viruses in candidates and the approach to immunity optimization during a period of heightened awareness. Methods A cross‐sectional study from 2012 to 2016 at Cleveland Clinic Children's included pediatric solid organ transplant candidates. Data on vaccination history, serology, and demographics were collected. Incomplete immunity was defined by incomplete vaccination or seronegativity. Results Among 91 candidates, 54.9% had complete varicella vaccination. Serological varicella immunity among patients tested varied by age: < 7 years, 50.0% positive in patients with complete schedules, none in the incomplete; ≥ 7 years, 50.0% positive in patients with complete schedules, 65.5% in the incomplete. For measles, 69.2% had complete vaccination, with immunity varying by age among those tested: < 7 years, 84.6% positive in patients with complete schedules, 42.9% in the incomplete; ≥ 7 years, 81.0% with complete, 62.5% with incomplete. Only 31.1% of those who qualified for a varicella additional dose and 28% who qualified for an additional measles dose received it, respectively. Conclusions Incomplete immunity to varicella and measles was prevalent in pediatric solid organ transplant candidates at our center during the study period. Despite an increase in global measles activity, our efforts to optimize immunity through additional vaccine doses were only partially successful. Future research should focus on addressing strategies and understanding barriers to ensure timely vaccination for this vulnerable population prior to transplant, especially during periods of increased viral activity.
'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(23.036 .093 25.536)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(45.87 1.273 16.18)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(69.945 .996 12.078)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(20.66 -19.689 31.932)'/%3e%3c/svg%3e)