Abstract The extremely low melt flowability of ultra‐high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) is the primary obstacle to its melt processing. Particularly in melt spinning processes, the extremely high molecular weight of UHMWPE and the density of entangled molecular chains severely limit its production efficiency and monofilament performance. This study investigates the effect of flow modifiers on the melt spinning process of UHMWPE/HDPE blends, focusing on CaSt 2 , PEG, and CaSt 2 /silicone powder composite additives, and their impact on the standard tensile samples and monofilament tensile properties of UHMWPE/HDPE. The mechanism of additive influence on the tensile properties of UHMWPE/HDPE blends is analyzed through tensile strength testing, thermal analysis, and microscopic morphology observation. The results show that in standard tensile samples, CaSt 2 or CaSt 2 /silicone powder composite additives can enhance the crystallinity of the blend, thereby improving its tensile strength. Conversely, adding PEG significantly reduces the crystallinity and tensile strength of the blend. The maximum tensile strength of CaSt 2 ‐modified UHMWPE/HDPE monofilament is 1236.61 MPa. This enhancement is attributed to the lubricating effect of CaSt 2 , which simultaneously assists the molecular chains in the amorphous region, and the reorientation of the stress‐induced molten lamellar structure under tension, greatly promoting the formation of straight‐chain crystals in the monofilament. During hot drawing, PEG inhibits the formation of straight‐chain crystals in the monofilament, resulting in a 3.06% decrease in maximum crystallinity compared with standard tensile samples. When CaSt 2 is combined with silicone powder, the additives tend to aggregate during hot drawing, and these larger aggregate particles hinder the orientation of molecular chains along the drawing direction, resulting in a 30.75% decrease in maximum tensile strength of the monofilament compared with the standard tensile samples. Highlights The tensile property of UHMWPE/HDPE blends modified with additives was discussed. Analytical techniques including DSC, SEM, and tensile strength tests were used. The maximum tensile strength of the monofilament can reach up to 1236.61 MPa. UHMWPE/HDPE/CaSt 2 = 60/40/0.5 exhibits the best tensile property.
The enrichment of viable cells is an essential step to obtain effective products for cell therapy. While procedures exist to characterize the viability of cells, most methods to exclude nonviable cells require the use of density gradient centrifugation or antibody-based cell sorting with molecular labels of cell viability. We report a label-free microfluidic technique to separate live and dead cells that exploits differences in cellular stiffness. The device uses a channel with repeated ridges that are diagonal with respect to the direction of cell flow. Stiff nonviable cells directed through the channel are compressed and translated orthogonally to the channel length, while soft live cells follow hydrodynamic flow. As a proof of concept, Jurkat cells are enriched to high purity of viable cells by a factor of 185-fold. Cell stiffness was validated as a sorting parameter as nonviable cells were substantially stiffer than live cells. To highlight the utility for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, frozen samples of cord blood were thawed and the purity of viable nucleated cells was increased from 65% to over 94% with a recovery of 73% of the viable cells. Thus, the microfluidic stiffness sorting can simply and efficiently obtain highly pure populations of viable cells.
Abnormal cell mechanical stiffness can point to the development of various diseases including cancers and infections. We report a new microfluidic technique for continuous cell separation utilizing variation in cell stiffness. We use a microfluidic channel decorated by periodic diagonal ridges that compress the flowing cells in rapid succession. The compression in combination with secondary flows in the ridged microfluidic channel translates each cell perpendicular to the channel axis in proportion to its stiffness. We demonstrate the physical principle of the cell sorting mechanism and show that our microfluidic approach can be effectively used to separate a variety of cell types which are similar in size but of different stiffnesses, spanning a range from 210 Pa to 23 kPa. Atomic force microscopy is used to directly measure the stiffness of the separated cells and we found that the trajectories in the microchannel correlated to stiffness. We have demonstrated that the current processing throughput is 250 cells per second. This microfluidic separation technique opens new ways for conducting rapid and low-cost cell analysis and disease diagnostics through biophysical markers.
We report a microfluidic approach to separate and enrich a mixture of two cell types based on differences in cell viscoelastic behavior during repeated compressions and relaxation events. As proof of concept, we demonstrate that variations in viscoelasticity affect the flow trajectory of one type of leukemia cell line (K562) in relation to another leukemia cell line (HL60) as well as healthy leukocytes. These differences in cell trajectory can be utilized to enrich and sort K562 cells from HL60 cells and leukocytes. The microfluidic device utilizes periodic, diagonal ridges to compress and translate the cells laterally perpendicular to channel axis. The ridge spacing is tuned to allow relaxation of the K562 cells but not the HL60 cells or leukocytes. Therefore, the periodic compression laterally translates weakly viscous cells, while highly viscous cells respond to hydrodynamic circulation forces generated by the slanted ridges. As a result, cell sorting has strong dependency on cell viscosity. We use atomic force microscopy and high-speed optical microscopy to measure cell stiffness, cell relaxation rate constant, and cell size for all cell types. With properly designed microfluidic channels, we can optimize the enrichment of K562 cells from HL60 and leukocytes.
'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(23.036 .093 25.536)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(45.87 1.273 16.18)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(69.945 .996 12.078)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(20.66 -19.689 31.932)'/%3e%3c/svg%3e)