Abstract The prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is poor. In order to find out appropriate treatment for each group of patients, we aim to examine the prognostic factors influencing survival for esophageal cancer patients in Taiwan. Data were obtained from the Taiwan Society of Cancer Registry. There were 14,394 esophageal cancer patients analyzed between 2008 and 2014 in this retrospective review. The impact of the clinicopathologic factors on overall survival was assessed. The following clinic‐pathologic factors were included to analyses: age, sex, tumor location, tumor length, histologic grade, clinical T, clinical N, clinical M, clinical stage, and all therapeutic methods within 3 months after diagnosis. The 5‐year survival rate was 16.8%, with a median survival of 343 days. The distribution of patients by their clinical stage is as follows: stage 0 ( n = 162; 1.1%); stage I ( n = 964; 6.7%); stage II ( n = 2392; 16.6%); stage III ( n = 6636; 46.1%); and stage IV ( n = 3661; 25.4%). In the multivariate analysis, age, sex, tumor location, tumor length, clinical T, clinical N, clinical M, and treatment remained independent prognostic factors. Our data indicated that age, sex, tumor location, tumor length, clinical T, clinical N, clinical M, and treatment remained independent prognostic factors. Patients who could receive surgery had significantly better outcomes.
As Cloud services are burgeoning and attractive to HPC developers in virtue of the virtualization technology, how to establish their own dedicated virtual cluster easily become a very important problem. To contribute this issue, Easy Virtual Cluster with Cloud Storage (called VClouster) has been developed by Pervasive Computing Team in the National Center for High-performance Computing (NCHC). Just easy operation, NCHC VClouster helps building a Computing Cloud for HPC numerical simulation. It satisfies various customized demands and has high scalability for virtual machines (VM) so the performance of using Cloud service can be improved. NCHC VClouster system is a friendly design for Cloud users to send their requests, through the user specification it would create a customized and dedicated virtual cluster on demand for different users automatically. The system leverages Cloud toolkit combined with Cloud storage service, then Cloud users do not worry about the transmission of a huge amount of application data. NCHC VClouster also introduces International Certificate Authority (CA) services so that authorized users can easily utilize their virtual machines and integrate more computing resources in same CA organization.
The role of adjuvant chemoradiation in esophageal cancer has been underestimated in the literature. This study was undertaken to determine whether adjuvant chemoradiation improves survival compared with surgery alone.Data of 1095 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients, including 679 in surgery alone group (group 1) and 416 in surgery followed adjuvant chemoradaition group (group 2), were obtained from the Taiwan Cancer Registry database. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to identify 147 well-balanced patients in each group for overall survival comparison.After PSM, the 3-year survival rates and median survival were 44.9% and 27.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 17.6-40.3) months in group 2, which is significantly higher than that in group 1 (28.1% and 18.2 [95% CI: 14.3-24.5] months, P = 0.0043). In the multivariate survival analysis, pT3/4 stage (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.38-2.97, P < 0.001), pN+ stage (HR: 1.83, 95% CI: 1.31-2.57, P = 0.0004), tumor length more than 32 mm (HR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.33-2.79, P < 0.001), R1/2 resection (HR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.15-2.66, P = 0.009), and adjuvant chemoradiation (HR: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.42-0.78, P < 0.0001) were independent prognostic factors. Subgroup analysis suggested patients with pT3/4 stage, pN+ stage tumors, larger tumor size, poorly differentiated tumors, and R1/2 resections were more likely to demonstrate survival benefit from adjuvant chemoradiation.Compared with surgery alone, adjuvant chemoradiation provides a survival benefit to ESCC patients, especially those with pT3/4 stage, N+ tumors, larger tumor size, poorly differentiated tumors, and R1/2 resections.
While preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery (pre-OP CRT) has been widely applied in the treatment of patients with esophageal cancer, some studies have shown a survival benefit of postoperative chemoradiation (post-OP CRT). The optimal combination of multimodality therapy and the sequence of surgery and chemoradiation for esophageal cancer remain to be investigated. A total of 1385 patients with clinical stage II and III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) were included. On the basis of the sequence of surgery and chemoradiation, the patients were grouped as follows: preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery (pre-OP CRT+S), surgery alone (S), and surgery followed by postoperative chemoradiation (S+post-OP CRT). Propensity score matching analysis was used to identify 78 well-balanced patients in each group for outcome comparison. In all, 753, 339, and 293 patients were in the pre-OP CRT+S, S, and S+post-OP CRT groups, respectively. Before matching, no differences were observed in the overall survival among the patients in these 3 groups (P = 0.422). After matching, both the pre-OP CRT+S and S+post-OP CRT groups were significantly associated with a better survival compared with the S group (pre-OP CRT+S vs. S: P < 0.001; S+post-OP CRT vs. S: P = 0.005). In contrast, the survival was similar between the pre-OP CRT+S and S+post-OP CRT groups (P = 0.544). In the subgroup analysis, patients with clinical T3/4 stage tumors or those with a tumor size greater than 5 cm were more likely to demonstrate an overall survival benefit from pre-OP CRT compared with post-OP CRT. Both pre-OP CRT and post-OP CRT demonstrated a survival benefit compared with surgery alone, which indicates the importance of trimodality therapy in patients with clinical stage II/III ESCC. However, no survival difference was observed among patients in the pre-OP CRT+S and S+post-OP CRT groups, which suggests that the sequence of surgery and chemoradiation may be irrelevant to the outcome.
The purpose of the current study is to compare definitive chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with cT1-3/N0-3 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in survival.Records from 2008 to 2014 of 4931 patients with clinical T1-3/N0-3 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy or esophagectomy with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy were obtained from the Taiwan Cancer Registry. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed and propensity score matching was used to minimize the bias. Overall survival was compared between definitive chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and also in the three different clinical stages.Definitive chemoradiotherapy was performed on 4381 patients, and 550 patients received esophagectomy adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Each group produced 456 patients for comparison after propensity score matching. The 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year overall survival rates for matched patients in with definitive chemoradiotherapy group were 57.18%, 31.92%, and 23.8%. The 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year overall survival rates for matched patients treated in the esophagectomy with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy group were 72.35%, 45.74%, and 34.04%(p<0.0001). In multivariable analysis, treatment modality was an independent prognostic factor. Esophagectomy with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy provided better survival outcome than definitive chemoradiotherapy for patients with clinical stage II/III disease. As for patients with clinical stage I disease, there was no significant survival difference between definitive chemoradiotherapy and esophagectomy with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy.Esophagectomy with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy provided better survival than definitive chemoradiotherapy in clinical II/III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, more data are needed to conduct a convincing conclusion in clinical stage I patients.
Few data are currently available on the factors associated with survival in oesophageal cancer patients who achieve pathological complete response (pCR) after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Using a nationwide database, we investigated the predictors of survival in this patient group. Data were retrieved from the Taiwan Cancer Registry to identify patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) who achieved pCR after CRT followed by oesophagectomy between 2008 and 2013. The median number of dissected nodes (20) was used as the cut-off to classify the extent of lymph node dissection (LND). Tumour location was defined according to the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were used to identify factors associated with survival. Of the 1103 patients who underwent CRT followed by surgery, 319 (28.9%) achieved pCR. Thirty- and 90-day mortality rates were 3.5 and 4.7%, respectively. The 3-year overall survival rate was 55.9%. Multivariate Cox survival analysis identified age ≥55 years [hazard ratio (HR): 1.72, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07 to 2.78, P = 0.025], an LND number of <20 (HR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.01 to 2.61, P = 0.047) and lesions located in the upper third (HR: 2.35, 95% CI: 1.18 to 4.65, P = 0.015) as adverse prognostic factors for survival in pCR patients. Patient age ≥55 years, upper third lesions and an LND number of <20 are adverse prognostic factors in OSCC patients who achieve pCR following CRT. High-risk patients should be strictly followed.
Abstract Adjuvant chemoradiation is reported to have a survival benefit for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We evaluated the “upfront surgery and pathological stage-based adjuvant chemoradiation” strategy, in which adjuvant therapy is guided by pathological stage, in locally advanced ESCC. Data from 2976 clinical stage II/III ESCC patients, including 1735 in neoadjuvant chemoradiation and 1241 in upfront surgery groups, were obtained from a nationwide database. Patients in the upfront surgery group were further categorized into the “upfront surgery and pathological stage-based adjuvant chemoradiation” and “upfront surgery only” groups. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rates in the “neoadjuvant chemoradiation”, “upfront surgery and pathological stage-based adjuvant chemoradiation”, and “upfront surgery only” groups were 41.5%, 45.8%, and 28.5%, respectively. In propensity score matched patients, the 3-year OS rate was 41.7% in the neoadjuvant chemoradiation group, compared to 35.6% in the “upfront surgery and pathological stage-based adjuvant chemoradiation” group ( p = 0.147), and 20.3% in the “upfront surgery only” group ( p < 0.001). No survival difference was observed between the “neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery” protocol and the “upfront surgery and pathological stage-based adjuvant chemoradiation” strategy.
'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(60)'/%3e%3ccircle r='17' fill='%23000095'/%3e%3ccircle r='15' fill='%23fff'/%3e%3c/svg%3e)
'%3e%3cpath fill='%23012169' d='M0 0v30h60V0z'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='6' d='m0 0 60 30m0-30L0 30'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23C8102E' stroke-width='4' d='m0 0 60 30m0-30L0 30' clip-path='url(%23b)'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='10' d='M30 0v30M0 15h60'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23C8102E' stroke-width='6' d='M30 0v30M0 15h60'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e)