Abstract Background Due to their anatomical locations, optic pathway gliomas (OPGs) can rarely be cured by resection. Given the importance of preserving visual function, we analyzed radiological and visual acuity (VA) outcomes for the type II RAF inhibitor tovorafenib in the OPG subgroup of the phase 2 FIREFLY-1 trial. Methods FIREFLY-1 investigated the efficacy (arm 1, n=77), safety, and tolerability (arms 1/2) of tovorafenib (420 mg/m2 once weekly; 600 mg maximum) in patients with BRAF-altered relapsed/refractory pediatric low-grade glioma (pLGG). In this post hoc analysis, anti-tumor activity and VA were analyzed in arm 1 patients with OPG. Anti-tumor activity was independently assessed per Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology high-grade glioma (RANO-HGG), Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology-LGG (RAPNO) and RANO-LGG criteria. The data cutoff was June 5, 2023. Results Forty-two of 77 patients had OPGs; 35 of 42 had ≥2 VA assessments. The overall response rate in the OPG subgroup according to RANO-HGG, RAPNO and RANO-LGG criteria were 64%, 50%, and 55%, with clinical benefit rates 95%, 88%, and 90%, respectively. VA per patient was preserved for 80% of patients; 31% demonstrated improved VA; VA per eye was preserved in 87%, with 27% improving. The safety profile in the arm 1 OPG subgroup was similar to the overall FIREFLY-1 safety analysis set. Conclusions Tovorafenib demonstrated anti-tumor activity in relapsed/refractory BRAF-altered OPG across radiological assessment criteria and was generally well tolerated. Importantly, vision remained stable or improved in most patients.
Objectives To assess the impact of a clinical decision model for febrile children at risk for serious bacterial infections (SBI) attending the emergency department (ED). Methods Randomized controlled trial with 439 febrile children, aged 1 month-16 years, attending the pediatric ED of a Dutch university hospital during 2010-2012. Febrile children were randomly assigned to the intervention (clinical decision model; n=219) or the control group (usual care; n=220). The clinical decision model included clinical symptoms, vital signs, and C-reactive protein and provided high/low-risks for "pneumonia" and "other SBI". Nurses were guided by the intervention to initiate additional tests for high-risk children. The clinical decision model was evaluated by 1) area-under-the-receiver-operating-characteristic-curve (AUC) to indicate discriminative ability and 2) feasibility, to measure nurses' compliance to model recommendations. Primary patient outcome was defined as correct SBI diagnoses. Secondary process outcomes were defined as length of stay; diagnostic tests; antibiotic treatment; hospital admission; revisits and medical costs. Results The decision model had good discriminative ability for both pneumonia (n=33; AUC 0.83 (95% CI 0.75-0.90)) and other SBI (n=22; AUC 0.81 (95% CI 0.72-0.90)). Compliance to model recommendations was high (86%). No differences in correct SBI determination were observed. Application of the clinical decision model resulted in less full-blood-counts (14% vs. 22%, p-value<0.05) and more urine-dipstick testing (71% vs. 61%, p-value<0.05). Conclusions In contrast to our expectations no substantial impact on patient outcome was perceived. The clinical decision model preserved, however, good discriminatory ability to detect SBI, achieved good compliance among nurses and resulted in a more standardized diagnostic approach towards febrile children, with less full blood-counts and more rightfully urine-dipstick testing. Trial Registration Nederlands Trial Register NTR2381
We present the case of a 15-year-old girl, with a fifth cystic progression of an adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma after multiple surgeries and previous local radiotherapy. She had severe visual impairment, panhypopituitarism including diabetes insipidus, and several components of hypothalamic damage, including morbid obesity and severe fatigue. To prevent further late effects hampering her quality of survival, she was treated biweekly with intravenous tocilizumab, an anti-interleukin-6 agent, which stabilized the cyst for a prolonged time. Based on the biology of adamantinomatous craniopharyngioma, this immune-modulating treatment seems promising for the treatment of this cystic tumor in order to reduce surgery and delay or omit radiotherapy.
Abstract INTRODUCTION: Most pediatric low grade gliomas, and a substantial part of PXAs, have a BRAF alteration/activated MAPK pathway. This group often requires several lines of therapy, which coincides with significant morbidity. There is growing evidence that molecular targeted treatment may be beneficial for this population. Here we report the toxicity and efficacy of patients treated off-trial with either trametinib monotherapy or in combination with dabrafenib. METHODS: We performed a single-center retrospective chart review of all neuro-oncological patients who received trametinib monotherapy or in combination with dabrafenib (compassionate-use) in the Princes Maxima Center between April 1st, 2018 and December 31st, 2021. RESULTS: 22 patients (ages 1-21 years) were included of whom 14 received trametinib monotherapy (BRAF-KIAA fusion, n=10) and eight received trametinib/dabrafenib combination therapy (BRAFV600 mutation, n=8). All patients on trametinib monotherapy (n=14) developed skin problems such as rash (100%), dry skin (86%), paronychia (71%) and eczema (64%). Eight patients (57%) had at least one adverse event (AE) ≥grade 3. Patients on trametinib and dabrafenib showed similar toxicity, although with lower prevalence and no paronychia. One patient (13%) had an AE ≥grade 3. Median treatment time of trametinib was 514 days (IQR 455) and for trametinib and dabrafenib 360 days (IQR 512). Five patients (36%) on trametinib are still on treatment and nine patients (64%) stopped treatment due to e.g. tumor progression or toxicity. All patients on trametinib and dabrafenib are still on treatment. Best overall response of trametinib monotherapy (n=14 evaluated) was observed as partial response (50%), stable disease (33%) and progressive disease (17%). Combination therapy (n=7 evaluated) brought 100% partial response. CONCLUSION: Dermatological toxicities are mostly seen in trametinib monotherapy or in combination with dabrafenib. Despite moderate toxicity patients seem to benefit from treatment. Results suggest that combination therapy has a more favorable toxicity profile than monotherapy.
In this study, we aimed to identify characteristics of (unscheduled) revisits and its optimal time frame after Emergency Department (ED) discharge. Children with fever, dyspnea, or vomiting/diarrhea (1 month-16 years) who attended the ED of Erasmus MC-Sophia, Rotterdam (2010-2013), the Netherlands, were prospectively included. Three days after ED discharge, we applied standardized telephonic questionnaires on disease course and revisits. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent characteristics of revisits. Young age, parental concern, and alarming signs and symptoms (chest wall retractions, ill appearance, clinical signs of dehydration, and tachypnea) were associated with revisits (n = 527) in children at risk for serious infections discharged from the ED (n = 1765). Children revisited the ED within a median of 2 days (IQR 1.0-3.0), but this was proven to be shorter in children with vomiting/diarrhea (1.0 day (IQR 1.0-2.0)) compared to children with fever or dyspnea (2.0 (IQR 1.0-3.0)).Young age, parental concern, and alarming signs and symptoms (chest wall retractions, ill appearance, clinical signs of dehydration, and tachypnea) were associated with emergency health care revisits in children with fever, dyspnea, and vomiting/diarrhea. These characteristics could help to define targeted review of children during post-discharge period. We observed a disease specific and differential timing of control revisits after ED discharge. What is Known • Fever, dyspnea, and vomiting/diarrhea are major causes of emergency care attendance in children. • As uncertainty remains on uneventful recovery, patients at risk need to be identified on order to improve safety netting after discharge from the ED. What is New • In children with fever, dyspnea, and vomiting/diarrhea, young age, parental concern and chest wall retractions, ill appearance, clinical signs of dehydration, and tachypnea help to define targeted review of children during the post-discharge period. • A revisit after ED discharge is disease-specific and seems to be shorter for children with vomiting/diarrhea than others.
Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are common side effects in pediatric oncology treatment. Besides 5-HT3-antagonists, both dexamethasone and aprepitant are cornerstone drugs in controlling these side effects. Based on results of adult studies, the dexamethasone dose is reduced by 50% when combined with aprepitant, because of a drug-drug interaction, even though data on the interaction in children is lacking. The current study was developed to investigate the effect of aprepitant on dexamethasone clearance (CL) in children, in order to assess if dexamethasone dose reduction for concomitant use of aprepitant is appropriate in the current antiemetic regimen.In total, 65 children (0.6-17.9 years), receiving intravenous or oral antiemetic therapy (dexamethasone ± aprepitant) as standard of care, were included. 305 dexamethasone plasma concentrations were determined using LC-MS/MS. An integrated dexamethasone and aprepitant pharmacokinetic model was developed using non-linear mixed effects modelling in order to investigate the effect of aprepitant administration on dexamethasone CL.In this population, dexamethasone CL in patients with concomitant administration of aprepitant was reduced by approximately 30% of the uninhibited CL (23.3 L/h (95% confidence interval 20.4-26.0)). This result is not consistent with the results of adult studies (50% reduction). This difference was not age dependent, but might be related to the route of administration of dexamethasone. Future studies are needed to assess the difference in oral/intravenous dexamethasone.When dexamethasone is given intravenously as a component of triple therapy to prevent CINV in children, we advise to reduce the dexamethasone dose by 30% instead of 50%.
Children diagnosed with brain tumors are at risk to develop neurocognitive problems. Post-traumatic stress and sleep have been associated with poorer neurocognitive outcomes in the general population, and could be potential targets for intervention in brain tumor patients. Therefore, this study examined neurocognitive functioning in children newly diagnosed with a brain tumor and the associations between posttraumatic stress and sleep with neurocognitive outcomes.
Survival of childhood-onset craniopharyngioma (cCP) is excellent; however, many survivors suffer from hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction. Growth hormone replacement therapy (GHRT) is of high importance for linear growth and metabolic outcome. Optimal timing for initiation of GHRT in cCP is on debate because of concerns regarding tumor progression or recurrence.A systematic review and cohort studys were performed for the effect and timing of GHRT on overall mortality, tumor progression/recurrence, and secondary tumors in cCP. Within the cohort, cCP receiving GHRT ≤1 year after diagnosis were compared to those receiving GHRT >1 year after diagnosis.Evidence of 18 included studies, reporting on 6,603 cCP with GHRT, suggests that GHRT does not increase the risk for overall mortality, progression, or recurrent disease. One study evaluated timing of GHRT and progression/recurrence-free survival and found no increased risk with earlier initiation. One study reported a higher than expected prevalence of secondary intracranial tumors compared to a healthy population, possibly confounded by radiotherapy. In our cohort, 75 of 87 cCP (86.2%) received GHRT for median of 4.9 years [0.0-17.1]. No effect of timing of GHRT was found on mortality, progression/recurrence-free survival, or secondary tumors.Although the quality of the evidence is low, the available evidence suggests no effect of GHRT or its timing on mortality, tumor progression/recurrence, or secondary neoplasms in cCP. These results support early initiation of GHRT in cCP aiming to optimize linear growth and metabolic outcome. Prospective studies are needed to increase the level of evidence upon the optimal timing to start GHRT in cCP patients.
Abstract Introduction: Treatment for childhood-onset craniopharyngioma (cCP) has shifted from complete to limited resection aiming to avoid additional hypothalamic morbidity. Up to 90% of cCP patients develop growth hormone deficiency (GHD). GH replacement therapy (GHRT) is of high importance for linear growth and metabolic state. Hardly any studies evaluated the optimal time to start GHRT in relation to tumor progression or recurrence. Our aim was to assess the effect of GHRT in cCP on tumor progression/recurrence. Methods: Patients with cCP diagnosed between 2001 and 2022, with at least one year of follow-up were included. Tumor progression/recurrence was defined as tumor progression/recurrence requiring intervention. Kaplan Meier and multivariable cox regression analyses were estimated for tumor progression/recurrence. Comparison was made between cCP patients with GHRT and without GHRT. Of the cCP patients receiving GHRT, those given GHRT ≤ 1 year of cCP diagnosis were compared to those given GHRT >1 year after cCP diagnosis. Results: Of 59 cCP patients, 52 were diagnosed with GHD and 51 (86.4%) received GHRT. Sixteen cCP patients (31.4%) developed tumor progression/recurrence during GHRT compared to four cCP patients (50.0%) without GHRT. Mean progression free survival (PFS) did not differ between cCP patients with or without GHRT (GHRT: 5.55 years 95% CI 3.74 - 7.36 vs. no GHRT: 3.69 years 95% CI 1.44 - 5.93). Of cCP patients who started GHRT ≤1 year after cCP diagnosis, 36.4% developed tumor progression/recurrence compared to 27.6% of cCP patients who received GHRT > 1 year after diagnosis (PFS: 8.45 years CI 95% 5.54 – 11.36 vs. 7.99 years CI 95% 6.03 – 9.94). Limited surgery was associated to tumor progression/recurrence (HR 6.99 CI 95% 2.10 – 23.25). Conclusion: GHRT does not seem to influence tumor progression/recurrence in cCP. These results support early initiation of GHRT in cCP patients to optimize linear growth and metabolic outcome.
