The World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Labour Organization (ILO) are developing Joint Estimates of the work-related burden of disease and injury (WHO/ILO Joint Estimates), with contributions from a large network of experts. Evidence from mechanistic data suggests that exposure to long working hours may increase alcohol consumption and cause alcohol use disorder. In this paper, we present a systematic review and meta-analysis of parameters for estimating the number of deaths and disability-adjusted life years from alcohol consumption and alcohol use disorder that are attributable to exposure to long working hours, for the development of the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates.We aimed to systematically review and meta-analyse estimates of the effect of exposure to long working hours (three categories: 41-48, 49-54 and ≥55 h/week), compared with exposure to standard working hours (35-40 h/week), on alcohol consumption, risky drinking (three outcomes: prevalence, incidence and mortality) and alcohol use disorder (three outcomes: prevalence, incidence and mortality).We developed and published a protocol, applying the Navigation Guide as an organizing systematic review framework where feasible. We searched electronic bibliographic databases for potentially relevant records from published and unpublished studies, including the WHO International Clinical Trials Register, Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and CISDOC on 30 June 2018. Searches on PubMed were updated on 18 April 2020. We also searched electronic grey literature databases, Internet search engines and organizational websites; hand-searched reference list of previous systematic reviews and included study records; and consulted additional experts.We included working-age (≥15 years) workers in the formal and informal economy in any WHO and/or ILO Member State but excluded children (<15 years) and unpaid domestic workers. We considered for inclusion randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies and other non-randomized intervention studies with an estimate of the effect of exposure to long working hours (41-48, 49-54 and ≥55 h/week), compared with exposure to standard working hours (35-40 h/week), on alcohol consumption (in g/week), risky drinking, and alcohol use disorder (prevalence, incidence or mortality).At least two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts against the eligibility criteria at a first stage and full texts of potentially eligible records at a second stage, followed by extraction of data from publications related to qualifying studies. Two or more review authors assessed the risk of bias, quality of evidence and strength of evidence, using Navigation Guide and GRADE tools and approaches adapted to this project.Fourteen cohort studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 104,599 participants (52,107 females) in six countries of three WHO regions (Americas, South-East Asia, and Europe). The exposure and outcome were assessed with self-reported measures in most studies. Across included studies, risk of bias was generally probably high, with risk judged high or probably high for detection bias and missing data for alcohol consumption and risky drinking. Compared to working 35-40 h/week, exposure to working 41-48 h/week increased alcohol consumption by 10.4 g/week (95% confidence interval (CI) 5.59-15.20; seven studies; 25,904 participants, I2 71%, low quality evidence). Exposure to working 49-54 h/week increased alcohol consumption by 17.69 g/week (95% confidence interval (CI) 9.16-26.22; seven studies, 19,158 participants, I2 82%, low quality evidence). Exposure to working ≥55 h/week increased alcohol consumption by 16.29 g/week (95% confidence interval (CI) 7.93-24.65; seven studies; 19,692 participants; I2 82%, low quality evidence). We are uncertain about the effect of exposure to working 41-48 h/week, compared with working 35-40 h/week on developing risky drinking (relative risk 1.08; 95% CI 0.86-1.36; 12 studies; I2 52%, low certainty evidence). Working 49-54 h/week did not increase the risk of developing risky drinking (relative risk 1.12; 95% CI 0.90-1.39; 12 studies; 3832 participants; I2 24%, moderate certainty evidence), nor working ≥55 h/week (relative risk 1.11; 95% CI 0.95-1.30; 12 studies; 4525 participants; I2 0%, moderate certainty evidence). Subgroup analyses indicated that age may influence the association between long working hours and both alcohol consumption and risky drinking. We did not identify studies for which we had access to results on alcohol use disorder.Overall, for alcohol consumption in g/week and for risky drinking, we judged this body of evidence to be of low certainty. Exposure to long working hours may have increased alcohol consumption, but we are uncertain about the effect on risky drinking. We found no eligible studies on the effect on alcohol use disorder. Producing estimates for the burden of alcohol use disorder attributable to exposure to long working hours appears to not be evidence-based at this time. PROTOCOL IDENTIFIER: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.07.025.CRD42018084077.
A abordagem dos distúrbios respiratórios do sono com uso de pressão positiva contínua nas vias aéreas é considerada a forma mais eficiente de tratamento. É feita por meio de aparelho apropriado, chamado CPAP que se adapta a um tubo flexível através do qual o ar liberado pelo aparelho é conduzido até uma máscara firmemente adaptada ao nariz do paciente.Os portadores de distúrbios graves bem como os moderados sintomáticos, aderem facilmente a essa forma de tratamento. A adesão ao tratamento pode ser melhorada com medidas simples em alguns casos. As complicações são previsíveis e raras. Outras modalidades de dispositivos de pressão positiva ocasionalmente são mais bem toleradas e mais eficazes para o tratamento de hipoventilação alveolar e apnéias centrais.
ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To identify lifestyle-related, sociodemographic, and mental health characteristics of people with insomnia symptoms and people without insomnia during the pandemic. METHODS A case-control study was conducted with data collected by snowball sampling using an online questionnaire. From November 2020 to April 2021, 6,360 people with a mean age of 43.5 years (SD = 14.3) participated in the survey. For this study, we considered 158 cases of insomnia disorder and 476 controls (three controls per case) randomly selected from the participants without sleep problems. RESULTS The results of the comparative analysis between cases and controls showed that sleeping less than six hours daily (OR = 3.89; 95%CI 2.50–6.05), feeling sadness frequently (OR = 2.95; 95%CI 1.69–5.17), residing in metropolitan areas (OR = 1.71; 95%CI 1.04–2.84), being 40 years or older (OR = 1.93; 95%CI 1.22–3.06), and the interaction between occupation and poorer education (OR = 2.12; 95%CI 1.22–3.69) were predictors for symptoms of insomnia disorder during the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS In addition to confirming the hypothesis that mental health problems are associated with insomnia symptoms, the results point to insomnia as an important outcome for studies on the effects of unemployment, vulnerability and low education of the population, especially in large cities, highlighting that the effects of the crisis on health and the economy are extremely unequally distributed.
The World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Labour Organization (ILO) are developing Joint Estimates of the work-related burden of disease and injury (WHO/ILO Joint Estimates), with contributions from a large network of experts. Evidence from mechanistic data suggests that exposure to long working hours may cause ischaemic heart disease (IHD). In this paper, we present a systematic review and meta-analysis of parameters for estimating the number of deaths and disability-adjusted life years from IHD that are attributable to exposure to long working hours, for the development of the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates.We aimed to systematically review and meta-analyse estimates of the effect of exposure to long working hours (three categories: 41-48, 49-54 and ≥55 h/week), compared with exposure to standard working hours (35-40 h/week), on IHD (three outcomes: prevalence, incidence and mortality).We developed and published a protocol, applying the Navigation Guide as an organizing systematic review framework where feasible. We searched electronic databases for potentially relevant records from published and unpublished studies, including MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, CISDOC, PsycINFO, and WHO ICTRP. We also searched grey literature databases, Internet search engines and organizational websites; hand-searched reference lists of previous systematic reviews; and consulted additional experts.We included working-age (≥15 years) workers in the formal and informal economy in any WHO and/or ILO Member State but excluded children (aged < 15 years) and unpaid domestic workers. We included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies and other non-randomized intervention studies which contained an estimate of the effect of exposure to long working hours (41-48, 49-54 and ≥55 h/week), compared with exposure to standard working hours (35-40 h/week), on IHD (prevalence, incidence or mortality).At least two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts against the eligibility criteria at a first stage and full texts of potentially eligible records at a second stage, followed by extraction of data from qualifying studies. Missing data were requested from principal study authors. We combined relative risks using random-effect meta-analysis. Two or more review authors assessed the risk of bias, quality of evidence and strength of evidence, using Navigation Guide and GRADE tools and approaches adapted to this project.Thirty-seven studies (26 prospective cohort studies and 11 case-control studies) met the inclusion criteria, comprising a total of 768,751 participants (310,954 females) in 13 countries in three WHO regions (Americas, Europe and Western Pacific). The exposure was measured using self-reports in all studies, and the outcome was assessed with administrative health records (30 studies) or self-reported physician diagnosis (7 studies). The outcome was defined as incident non-fatal IHD event in 19 studies (8 cohort studies, 11 case-control studies), incident fatal IHD event in two studies (both cohort studies), and incident non-fatal or fatal ("mixed") event in 16 studies (all cohort studies). Because we judged cohort studies to have a relatively lower risk of bias, we prioritized evidence from these studies and treated evidence from case-control studies as supporting evidence. For the bodies of evidence for both outcomes with any eligible studies (i.e. IHD incidence and mortality), we did not have serious concerns for risk of bias (at least for the cohort studies). No eligible study was found on the effect of long working hours on IHD prevalence. Compared with working 35-40 h/week, we are uncertain about the effect on acquiring (or incidence of) IHD of working 41-48 h/week (relative risk (RR) 0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.91 to 1.07, 20 studies, 312,209 participants, I2 0%, low quality of evidence) and 49-54 h/week (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.17, 18 studies, 308,405 participants, I2 0%, low quality of evidence). Compared with working 35-40 h/week, working ≥55 h/week may have led to a moderately, clinically meaningful increase in the risk of acquiring IHD, when followed up between one year and 20 years (RR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.26, 22 studies, 339,680 participants, I2 5%, moderate quality of evidence). Compared with working 35-40 h/week, we are very uncertain about the effect on dying (mortality) from IHD of working 41-48 h/week (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.88 to 1.12, 13 studies, 288,278 participants, I2 8%, low quality of evidence) and 49-54 h/week (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.25, 11 studies, 284,474 participants, I2 13%, low quality of evidence). Compared with working 35-40 h/week, working ≥55 h/week may have led to a moderate, clinically meaningful increase in the risk of dying from IHD when followed up between eight and 30 years (RR 1.17, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.31, 16 studies, 726,803 participants, I2 0%, moderate quality of evidence). Subgroup analyses found no evidence for differences by WHO region and sex, but RRs were higher among persons with lower SES. Sensitivity analyses found no differences by outcome definition (exclusively non-fatal or fatal versus "mixed"), outcome measurement (health records versus self-reports) and risk of bias ("high"/"probably high" ratings in any domain versus "low"/"probably low" in all domains).We judged the existing bodies of evidence for human evidence as "inadequate evidence for harmfulness" for the exposure categories 41-48 and 49-54 h/week for IHD prevalence, incidence and mortality, and for the exposure category ≥55 h/week for IHD prevalence. Evidence on exposure to working ≥55 h/week was judged as "sufficient evidence of harmfulness" for IHD incidence and mortality. Producing estimates for the burden of IHD attributable to exposure to working ≥55 h/week appears evidence-based, and the pooled effect estimates presented in this systematic review could be used as input data for the WHO/ILO Joint Estimates.
Introduction Major concerns regarding the use of medication during pregnancy justify the need for safer interventions. Acupuncture is an emerging alternative for several clinical conditions during this period. The objective of this study is to summarise evidence derived from systematic reviews (SRs) focusing on acupuncture for pregnancy-related acute conditions. Methods Review of SRs. A systematic literature search was carried out in several electronic databases, aiming to include all SRs assessing the effects of acupuncture for acute conditions during pregnancy. Methodological quality and quality of the publication/reporting of each SR were assessed by the application of AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews) and PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses), respectively. Results The initial search retrieved 11 492 records, of which 16 SRs met our inclusion criteria. The average AMSTAR score was 7.3, the lowest score being 3 and the highest 11. The lowest PRISMA score was 12, the highest 25, and the average PRISMA score was 19.9. The results support the proposal that acupuncture might be considered an option for alleviating pain during labour, for correcting breech presentation, and for managing pelvic and back pain during pregnancy. There is insufficient evidence to recommend acupuncture for inducing labour, managing nausea and vomiting in early pregnancy, improving sleep quality, controlling nausea and vomiting associated with Caesarean delivery, and managing urinary infection. Conclusions Acupuncture might be an option for alleviating pain during labour, for correcting breech presentation, and for managing pelvic and back pain during pregnancy. More studies are needed to confirm the effects of acupuncture for other pregnancy-related acute conditions.
Introduction Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is a blood component therapy with a supraphysiological concentration of platelets derived from allogenic or, more commonly, autologous blood. PRP has been used in different non-transfusion indications because of its role in the promotion of tissue repair and healing, in fields such as Traumatology, Dermatology and Dentistry. Objective To provide a synthesis of the efficacy of PRP for different clinical situations. Methods Systematic searches were carried out in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and LILACS in July 2018 to identify systematic reviews (SRs) of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) focusing on PRP for non-transfusion use. Two authors independently screened all retrieved references in two stages (titles and abstracts at a first stage and full texts at a second stage). The methodological quality of SRs that met the eligibility criteria was appraised by AMSTAR 2. Conclusions were based on the most recent SRs with highest quality. Results One thousand two hundred and forty references were retrieved. After checking the inclusion criteria, 29 SRs of RCTs related to three different fields (wound care, Orthopedics and Dentistry) were included. The results suggest the benefit of PRP for different clinical situations, such as diabetic wounds, acute lesions of musculoskeletal system, rotator cuff lesions, tendinopathies, knee and hip osteoarthritis, total knee arthroplasty, allogenic bone graft for dental implants and periodontal intrabony defects. Conclusion There is low to moderate quality evidence supporting the efficacy of PRP for specific clinical situations. The low quality of the evidence limits the certainty of these findings. Well-planned and well-conducted RCTs are still needed to further assess the efficacy of PRP.
Aim: To assess the effects of neurodevelopmental treatment for children with cerebral palsy. Methods: We conducted a systematic review following the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and reported in accordance to PRISMA Statement. Through a comprehensive literature search we considered all randomized clinical trials that compared neurodevelopmental treatment with conventional physical therapy for children with cerebral palsy. We used the Cochrane Risk of Bias Table to assess the risk of bias of the included randomized clinical trial, and the GRADE approach to evaluate the certainty of the body of the evidence. Results: We found 3 randomized clinical trials (2 published and 1 ongoing) comprising 66 children. Published randomized clinical trials presented methodological and reporting limitations and only 1 provided data for outcomes of interest. No difference between neurodevelopmental treatment and conventional physical therapy was found for gross motor function (mean difference 1.40; 95% confidence interval –5.47 to 8.27, low certainty evidence). Conclusion: This review found that the effects of neurodevelopmental treatment for children with cerebral palsy are still uncertain. Further studies are required to assess the efficacy and safety of neurodevelopmental treatment for this purpose and until there, current evidence do not support its routinely use in practice. Number of protocol registration in PROSPERO database: CRD42017082817 (available from https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=82817 ).
'/%3e%3cpath id='l' d='M-26.25 0h52.5v-12h-40.5v-16h33v-12h-33v-11H25v-12h-51.25z'/%3e%3cpath id='k' d='M-31.5 0h12v-48l14 48h11l14-48V0h12v-70H14L0-22l-14-48h-17.5z'/%3e%3cpath id='b' fill-rule='evenodd' d='M0 0a31.5 35 0 0 0 0-70A31.5 35 0 0 0 0 0m0-13a18.5 22 0 0 0 0-44 18.5 22 0 0 0 0 44'/%3e%3cpath id='d' fill-rule='evenodd' d='M-31.5 0h13v-26h28a22 22 0 0 0 0-44h-40zm13-39h27a9 9 0 0 0 0-18h-27z'/%3e%3cpath id='n' d='M-15.75-22C-15.75-15-9-11.5 1-11.5s14.74-3.25 14.75-7.75c0-14.25-46.75-5.25-46.5-30.25C-30.5-71-6-70 3-70s26 4 25.75 21.25H13.5c0-7.5-7-10.25-15-10.25-7.75 0-13.25 1.25-13.25 8.5-.25 11.75 46.25 4 46.25 28.75C31.5-3.5 13.5 0 0 0c-11.5 0-31.55-4.5-31.5-22z'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' id='o' transform='scale(31.5)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' id='p' transform='scale(26.25)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' id='r' transform='scale(21)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' id='q' transform='scale(15)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' id='s' transform='scale(10.5)'/%3e%3cg id='m'%3e%3cclipPath id='c'%3e%3cpath d='M-31.5 0v-70h63V0zM0-47v12h31.5v-12z'/%3e%3c/clipPath%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23b' clip-path='url(%23c)'/%3e%3cpath d='M5-35h26.5v10H5z'/%3e%3cpath d='M21.5-35h10V0h-10z'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3cg id='h'%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23d'/%3e%3cpath d='M28 0c0-10 0-32-15-32H-6c22 0 22 22 22 32'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3cg id='a' fill='%23fff'%3e%3cg id='f'%3e%3cpath id='e' d='M0-1v1h.5' transform='rotate(18 0 -1)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23e' transform='scale(-1 1)'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23f' transform='rotate(72)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23f' transform='rotate(-72)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23f' transform='rotate(144)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23f' transform='rotate(216)'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/defs%3e%3crect width='100%25' height='100%25' x='-50%25' y='-50%25' fill='%23009b3a'/%3e%3cpath fill='%23fedf00' d='M-1743 0 0 1113 1743 0 0-1113z'/%3e%3ccircle r='735' fill='%23002776'/%3e%3cclipPath id='g'%3e%3ccircle r='735'/%3e%3c/clipPath%3e%3cpath fill='%23fff' d='M-2205 1470a1785 1785 0 0 1 3570 0h-105a1680 1680 0 1 0-3360 0z' clip-path='url(%23g)'/%3e%3cg fill='%23009b3a' transform='translate(-420 1470)'%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23b' y='-1697.5' transform='rotate(-7)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23h' y='-1697.5' transform='rotate(-4)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23i' y='-1697.5' transform='rotate(-1)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23j' y='-1697.5' transform='rotate(2)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23k' y='-1697.5' transform='rotate(5)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23l' y='-1697.5' transform='rotate(9.75)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23d' y='-1697.5' transform='rotate(14.5)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23h' y='-1697.5' transform='rotate(17.5)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23b' y='-1697.5' transform='rotate(20.5)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23m' y='-1697.5' transform='rotate(23.5)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23h' y='-1697.5' transform='rotate(26.5)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23j' y='-1697.5' transform='rotate(29.5)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23n' y='-1697.5' transform='rotate(32.5)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23n' y='-1697.5' transform='rotate(35.5)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23b' y='-1697.5' transform='rotate(38.5)'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23o' x='-600' y='-132'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23o' x='-535' y='177'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23p' x='-625' y='243'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23q' x='-463' y='132'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23p' x='-382' y='250'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23r' x='-404' y='323'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23o' x='228' y='-228'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23o' x='515' y='258'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23r' x='617' y='265'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23p' x='545' y='323'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23p' x='368' y='477'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23r' x='367' y='551'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23r' x='441' y='419'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23p' x='500' y='382'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23r' x='365' y='405'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23p' x='-280' y='30'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23r' x='200' y='-37'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23o' y='330'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23p' x='85' y='184'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23p' y='118'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23r' x='-74' y='184'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23q' x='-37' y='235'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23p' x='220' y='495'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23r' x='283' y='430'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23r' x='162' y='412'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23o' x='-295' y='390'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23s' y='575'/%3e%3c/svg%3e)
'%3e%3cpath fill='%23012169' d='M0 0v30h60V0z'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='6' d='m0 0 60 30m0-30L0 30'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23C8102E' stroke-width='4' d='m0 0 60 30m0-30L0 30' clip-path='url(%23b)'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='10' d='M30 0v30M0 15h60'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23C8102E' stroke-width='6' d='M30 0v30M0 15h60'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e)