Cancer is a serious threat to human health worldwide. Attention to the quality of life (QoL) of cancer patients is increasingly recognized as an important component of and a fundamental task in cancer care. Recent studies illustrate that resilience is a key biological factor affecting cancer patients' health status and QoL. However, few studies have focused on resilience during medical procedures of cancer patients from the perspective of nursing. In this study, we summarize recent literature exploring the clinical significance of resilience in oncology nursing, propose strategies for cancer care to improve the QoL of patients through interventions on resilience, and focus on emerging theories in oncology nursing. In summary, this will emphasize the importance of resilience in oncology nursing and benefit the clinical practices that improve patients' QoL and reduce the social burden caused by cancer. J. Med. Invest. 70 : 1-6, February, 2023.
Background:The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) is used as a tool to evaluate the adverse events (AE) of chemotherapy in cancer patients. Since CTCAE by medical providers underestimates AE more than patient-reported outcomes (PRO), the National Cancer Institute developed PRO-CTCAE. The present study investigated differences between symptoms detected using CTCAE by medical providers and PRO-CTCAE by breast cancer patients. Methods:Patients received chemotherapy comprising epirubicin and cyclophosphamide pre- or postoperatively. AE were evaluated using 4 questionnaires:PRO-CTCAE, CTCAE, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-30), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) after 1, 2, and 3 courses of chemotherapy. Results:Forty-two patients were registered. Regarding the recognition of psychological symptoms, such as fatigue, anxiety, and discouragement, and subjective symptoms, including heart palpitations and shortness of breath, PRO using PRO-CTCAE was significantly higher than medical provider-recognized outcomes using CTCAE. Concerning the recognition of regimen-specific symptoms, such as vomiting, nausea, and decreased appetite, medical provider- recognized outcomes were the same or higher than PRO. In QLQ-C30, the physical and role functions, fatigue and dyspnea significantly worsened after 2 and 3 courses of chemotherapy. J. Med. Invest. 71 : 82-91, February, 2024
Aims and objectives To examine the frequency, influencing factors and clinical course of shoulder pain in patients following lung resection. Background Thoracoscopes have been introduced in the surgical treatment of lung cancer and allow for less invasive surgery with a minimal incision. However, decubitus position‐related shoulder pain on the operated side has not yet been investigated. Design A longitudinal descriptive study. Methods Patients who underwent lung resection in the decubitus position. Patients were interviewed 2 days before surgery and once daily for 5 days after surgery. Interview items included background data, the concomitant use of epidural anaesthesia, operative duration, the presence of preoperative shoulder stiffness (excluding shoulder pain), type of surgery and site of operation. The intensity of pain was approximately 5 on an 11‐point numerical rating scale. Descriptive statistics on patient backgrounds were obtained using SPSS Statistics 22 for Windows. Results Of the 74 patients who underwent lung resection in a decubitus position, 30 (40.5%) developed shoulder pain on the operated side. The highest rating occurred 1 day after surgery and decreased over time. The following two factors were found to influence shoulder pain on the operated side: operative duration ( Z = −2.63; p = .01) and the presence of preoperative shoulder stiffness (excluding shoulder pain) (χ 2 = 4.16; p = .04). Conclusions This study demonstrated that approximately 40% of patients who underwent lung resection in the decubitus position developed shoulder pain. Relevance to clinical practice The presence of postoperative shoulder pain was related to both the duration of the operation and to the presence of preoperative shoulder stiffness. Although the shoulder pain resolves within 4 days, it causes the patient additional discomfort and distress. Therefore, further research is needed on positioning for thoracotomy in order to investigate ways to reduce or eliminate this complication of lung surgery.
This study aims to clarify how patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) hematological malignancies prepare for the future and set treatment goals. R/R hematological malignancies often require intensive therapies, including stem cell transplantation and CAR-T cell therapy, which pose high risks of adverse events. Many patients continue aggressive treatment until the end of life for pain relief or even a potential cure, despite the significant symptom burden. Understanding each patient's treatment motivations and preferences is essential to aligning care with their individual values. By examining their experiences, current health status, and treatment goals, this study seeks to provide a basis for holding early discussions on future care, contributing to individualized decision-making support for patients facing limited treatment options and uncertain prognoses. A qualitative descriptive study design was used to conduct semi-structured interviews with 16 patients with relapsed/refractory hematopoietic malignancies who were hospitalized for chemotherapy. The four main themes expressed by the participants were (I) I want to live through the treatment until the end of my life because I know recovery is difficult; (II) my current treatment depends on how much my body can endure; (III) I want to keep trying, but I am at the limit of what I can do now; and (IV) I want to continue even if the treatment is limited because I think it will help someone else. Patients with hematopoietic malignancies who are undergoing treatment may be motivated by a variety of different factors to continue with treatment. Discussing patients' goals and wishes with respect to treatment is critically important to ensure that such treatment is aligned with patients' preferences.