Background: A biphalangeal fifth toe is a common variant in the European population. The frequency is higher in the Japanese population. It is considered an anatomical variant of the normal triphalangeal fifth toe. Methods: Patients divided into three study groups were retrospectively reviewed to determine the effect of a biphalangeal fifth toe on the occurrence of clinically symptomatic pathology of the fifth ray. Results: The prevalence of a biphalangeal fifth toe in patients with hammer or claw toes was 65%, bunionettes 47%, and overriding fifth toe 37%. Only for the group with hammer or claw toes was prevalence significantly higher than that in the control group (39%). Conclusion: The stiffness and rigidity of the biphalangeal fifth toe may predispose it for symptomatic hammer or claw toe.
Four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT: three dimensional + time) allows to measure individual bone position over a period of time usually during motion. This method has been found useful in st...
Four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT: three dimensional + time) allows to measure individual bone position over a period of time usually during motion. This method has been found useful in studying the joints around the wrist as dynamic instabilities are difficult to detect during static CT scans while they can be diagnosed using a 4DCT scan [1]–[3]. For the foot, the PedCAT system (Curvebeam, Warrington, USA) has been developed to study the foot bones under full weight bearing, however its use is limited to static images. On the contrary, dynamic measurements of the foot kinematics using skin markers can only describe motion of foot segments and not of individual bones. However, the ability to measure individual bone kinematics during gait is of paramount importance as such detailed information could be used to detect instabilities, to evaluate the effect of joint degeneration, to help in pre-operative planning as well as in post-operative evaluation. The overall gait kinematics of two healthy volunteers were measured in a gait analysis lab (Movement Analysis Lab Leuven, Belgium) using a detailed foot-model (Oxford foot model, [4]). The measured plantar-dorsiflexion and in-eversion were used to manipulate their foot during a 4D CT acquisition. The manipulation was performed through a custom made foot manipulator that controls the position and orientation of the foot bed according to input kinematics. The manipulator was compatible with the 4D CT Scanner (Aquilion One, Toshiba, JP), and a sequence of CT scans (37 CT scans over 10 seconds with 320 slices for each scan and a slice thickness of 0.5 mm) was generated over the duration of the simulation. The position of the individual bones was determined using an automatic segmentation routine after which the kinematics of individual foot bones were calculated. To do so, three landmarks were tracked on each bone over time allowing to construct bone-specific coordinate frames. The motion of the foot bed was compared against the calculated kinematics of the tibia-calcaneus as the angles between these two bones are captured with skin markers. There is high repeatability between the imposed plantar/dorsiflexion and inversion/eversion and the calculated. Although the internal/external rotation was not imposed, the calculated kinematics follow the same pattern as the measured in the gait-analysis lab. Based on the validation of the tibia-calcaneus, the kinematics were also calculated between four other joints: tibia-talar, talar-calcaneus, calcaneus-cuboid and talar-navicular. Repeatable measurements of individual foot bone motion were obtained for both volunteers. The use of 4D CT-scanning in combination with a foot manipulator can provide more detailed information than skin marker-based gait-analysis e.g. for the study of the the tibia-talar joint. In the future, the foot manipulator will be tested for its sensitivity for specific pathologies (e.g. metatarsal coalition) and will be further developed to better resemble a real-life stance phase of gait (i.e. to include isolated heel contact and toe off).
Foot ulcers in patients with diabetes present an increasing burden to healthcare. Total contact cast (TCC) is a well established treatment option for many of these ulcers, but little seems to be known about the final outcome once healing has been reached. The study examined healing and final outcome after TCC treatment among patients with diabetes. During a 22-month period, 15 consecutive patients with a total of 17 ulcers started treatment with a TCC. Three patients (three ulcers) were lost to follow-up (FU). Average FU was 91 weeks. The patients were followed with emphasis on healing, complications during FU, footwear, compliance, and frequency of visits. All ulcers healed, some after additional surgery. During FU, control visits were performed at an average of one visit every 4.7 weeks. Notwithstanding this, a high frequency of ulcer recurrence and/or other complications was noticed. Only four patients out of 12 remained without any new (ulcer) problem during FU. TCC proved to be a very efficient tool to heal neuropathic foot ulcers, but the recurrence rate and frequency of other complications remained very high. These data show how difficult it is to achieve reliable (secondary) preventive general foot care, and to prescribe and manufacture reliable footwear.
A review of the first 10 arthroscopic ankle fusions at our institution was performed. Union was obtained in 7 of the 10 ankles with an average time to fusion of 4 months. There were 3 nonunions. Arthroscopic ankle fusion is less invasive than open techniques and less painful for the patient. However, there is a learning curve, and the arthroscopic technique is time-consuming. Arthroscopic ankle fusion has restricted indications, as patients with significant angulation, rotatory malalignment and extensive avascular necrosis of the talus can only be treated with open techniques.