The prevalence of overweight and obesity is steadily increasing in Austria as well as internationally. Obesity in particular is associated with multiple health risks, comorbidities, functional disability, and social stigma. Obesity is an independent, complex, chronic disease and should be treated as such by a multidisciplinary team of appropriately qualified personnel. In addition to recent international guidelines, this consensus paper outlines the overall principles of the management of overweight and obesity and provides guidance for the diagnosis and conservative treatment, focusing on lifestyle modifications and pharmacotherapy. Using the "5A" framework of behavioral health intervention, guidelines for a structured, pragmatic, and patient-centered medical care of adults with overweight or obesity are presented.Die Prävalenz von Übergewicht und Adipositas nimmt in Österreich – wie auch international – kontinuierlich zu. Insbesondere Adipositas ist mit multiplen Gesundheitsrisiken, Begleiterkrankungen, funktionellen Einschränkungen und sozialer Stigmatisierung assoziiert. Adipositas ist eine eigenständige und komplexe chronische Erkrankung und entsprechend multidisziplinär durch qualifizierte Fachkräfte zu behandeln. In Ergänzung rezenter internationaler Leitlinien skizziert das vorliegende Konsensuspapier allgemeine Grundsätze des Managements von Übergewicht und Adipositas und gibt Handlungsanleitungen für die Diagnose und für die konservative Therapie, wobei der Schwerpunkt auf die Lebensstilmodifikation und die medikamentöse Gewichtskontrolle gelegt wird. Anhand des „5A“-Modells der Verhaltensintervention wird ein Handlungsleitfaden für eine strukturierte, praxisorientierte und PatientInnen-zentrierte Betreuung von Menschen mit Übergewicht und Adipositas in Österreich präsentiert.
This study was designed to develop and validate the ADAPT (Assessment of the Demand for Additional Psychological Treatment), a questionnaire assessing the demand for disease-oriented counseling (DOC), integrated psychosomatic care (IPC), and psychotherapy (PT) in chronically ill patients on the example of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs).After its development, the ADAPT was distributed to 39 IBD patients along with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD), the Rating Form of IBD Patient Concerns (RFIPC), and a questionnaire on social support (SOZU-K22). For construct validity, 19 hypotheses were made on how DOC, IPC, and PT should correlate with HAD, RFIPC, SOZU-K22, and disease-related variables. To analyze interindividual responsiveness, patients were classified according to their bio-psycho-social state, and DOC, IPC, and PT scores were compared between these classes. The test-retest method with a 4-week time lapse was used to analyze reliability and intraindividual responsiveness. DOC, IPC, and PT scores between baseline and follow-up were compared separately for patients classified as "stable" or "changed" according to changes in HAD and disease activity.Observed correlations were largely in agreement with the 19 hypotheses. DOC, IPC, and PT achieved significantly different scores between different patients. After 4 weeks, DOC, IPC, and PT revealed stable scores in patients with "stable" HAD and revealed significantly different scores in patients with "changed" HAD. Changed disease activity was not associated with significant changes of the ADAPT.The ADAPT is the first questionnaire to assess subjective demand for additional psychological care in chronically ill patients. The first application of the ADAPT to 39 IBD patients suggests its validity, reliability, and responsiveness.
Psychological distress is frequent in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Whether there is a need for psychological interventions is unknown. This study investigated the quantity and quality of the need for psychological interventions in IBD as compared to rheumatoid arthritis (RA).In all, 302 patients with IBD and 109 patients with RA answered the ADAPT questionnaire, assessing the need for psychosomatic support (physicians support) and for psychotherapy, the hospital anxiety and depression scale, the SF-36, a questionnaire on social support (SOZU-K22), and the Rating Form of IBD Patient Concerns (IBD patients only). Detailed biomedical data were also assessed.Ninety-three patients with IBD (31%) expressed a need for psychological intervention compared to 14 patients with RA (13%; P < 0.001). Stepwise logistic regression analysis revealed that anxiety (odds ratio [OR] 3.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2-6.0; P < 0.001), age < or =44 years (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.5-4.3; P < 0.001) and impaired social support (SOZU-K22 <4.20) (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.2-3.3; P = 0.009) accounted for this difference. In IBD the need for psychosomatic (physicians) support was associated with worries and concerns about IBD and the need for psychotherapy was associated with worries and concerns about IBD, anxiety, impaired "social functioning" (SF-36), and short disease duration.Patients with IBD express a higher need for psychological interventions than patients with RA due to greater psychosocial restrictions inherent in IBD. The need for psychological interventions was characterized by psychological factors, mainly worries about the disease and anxiety, rather than by medical variables
