The HACEK organisms (Haemophilus species, Aggregatibacter species, Cardiobacterium hominis, Eikenella corrodens, and Kingella species) are rare causes of infective endocarditis (IE). The objective of this study is to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with HACEK endocarditis (HE) in a large multi-national cohort. Patients hospitalized with definite or possible infective endocarditis by the International Collaboration on Endocarditis Prospective Cohort Study in 64 hospitals from 28 countries were included and characteristics of HE patients compared with IE due to other pathogens. Of 5591 patients enrolled, 77 (1.4%) had HE. HE was associated with a younger age (47 vs. 61 years; p<0.001), a higher prevalence of immunologic/vascular manifestations (32% vs. 20%; p<0.008) and stroke (25% vs. 17% p = 0.05) but a lower prevalence of congestive heart failure (15% vs. 30%; p = 0.004), death in-hospital (4% vs. 18%; p = 0.001) or after 1 year follow-up (6% vs. 20%; p = 0.01) than IE due to other pathogens (n = 5514). On multivariable analysis, stroke was associated with mitral valve vegetations (OR 3.60; CI 1.34–9.65; p<0.01) and younger age (OR 0.62; CI 0.49–0.90; p<0.01). The overall outcome of HE was excellent with the in-hospital mortality (4%) significantly better than for non-HE (18%; p<0.001). Prosthetic valve endocarditis was more common in HE (35%) than non-HE (24%). The outcome of prosthetic valve and native valve HE was excellent whether treated medically or with surgery. Current treatment is very successful for the management of both native valve prosthetic valve HE but further studies are needed to determine why HE has a predilection for younger people and to cause stroke. The small number of patients and observational design limit inferences on treatment strategies. Self selection of study sites limits epidemiological inferences.
Elderly patients are emerging as a population at high risk for infective endocarditis (IE). However, adequately sized prospective studies on the features of IE in elderly patients are lacking.
Methods
In this multinational, prospective, observational cohort study within the International Collaboration on Endocarditis, 2759 consecutive patients were enrolled from June 15, 2000, to December 1, 2005; 1056 patients with IE 65 years or older were compared with 1703 patients younger than 65 years. Risk factors, predisposing conditions, origin, clinical features, course, and outcome of IE were comprehensively analyzed.
Results
Elderly patients reported more frequently a hospitalization or an invasive procedure before IE onset. Diabetes mellitus and genitourinary and gastrointestinal cancer were the major predisposing conditions. Blood culture yield was higher among elderly patients with IE. The leading causative organism wasStaphylococcus aureus, with a higher rate of methicillin resistance.Streptococcus bovisand enterococci were also significantly more prevalent. The clinical presentation of elderly patients with IE was remarkable for lower rates of embolism, immune-mediated phenomena, or septic complications. At both echocardiography and surgery, fewer vegetations and more abscesses were found, and the gain in the diagnostic yield of transesophageal echocardiography was significantly larger. Significantly fewer elderly patients underwent cardiac surgery (38.9% vs 53.5%;P < .001). Elderly patients with IE showed a higher rate of in-hospital death (24.9% vs 12.8%;P < .001), and age older than 65 years was an independent predictor of mortality.
Conclusions
In this large prospective study, increasing age emerges as a major determinant of the clinical characteristics of IE. Lower rates of surgical treatment and high mortality are the most prominent features of elderly patients with IE. Efforts should be made to prevent health care–associated acquisition and improve outcomes in this major subgroup of patients with IE.
Purpose: Infective Endocarditis (IE) is a disease which continues to have high mortality and morbidity, including nearly half of patients requiring cardiac surgery during the acute phase of IE. There has been no large, multicenter, prospective series comparing mechanical and biological prostheses in IE. Our objectives were to describe the characteristics of patients according to the type of valve replacement (mechanical or biological), and to examine whether the type of prosthesis was independently associated with in-hospital and 1-year mortality. Methods: The International Collaboration on Endocarditis - Prospective Cohort Study is a prospective, multicenter, international registry of IE cases. Among 5,591 patients 18 years or older, 1,467 patients with definite IE were operated on during the active phase of disease and had a biological (550; 37%) or mechanical (917; 63%) valve replacement. Results: As compared to patients who received mechanical prostheses, those who received bioprostheses were older (62 vs 54 years; p<.0001), more often had a history of cancer (9% vs 6%; p=0.009), and had moderate or severe renal disease (9% vs 4%; p=0.0003). Proportion of health care-associated IE was higher in the bioprosthesis group (26% vs 17%; p<.0001). Intracardiac abscesses were more frequent in the bioprosthesis group (30% vs 23%; p=0.0044). Both in-hospital and 1-year death rates were higher in the bioprosthesis group, 20.5% vs 14.0% (p=0.0009) and 25.3% vs 16.6% (p<.0001), respectively. Only 3 variables were independently associated with the type of prosthesis implanted. Mechanical prostheses were less commonly implanted in older patients (odds ratio: 0.64 for every 10 years; 0.56 - 0.73), and in patients with a history of cancer (0.72; 0.53 - 0.98), but were more commonly implanted in mitral position (1.60; 1.29 - 2.00). In the multivariable analysis, bioprosthesis was independently associated with 1-year mortality (hazard ratio: 1.298; 1.011-1.665; p=0.041). In sub-group analysis, biologic valve replacement remained independently associated with 1 year mortality in patients less than 65 years old, but not in older patients. Conclusion: Patients with IE who receive a biologic valve replacement have significant differences in clinical characteristics compared to patients who receive a mechanical prosthesis. Biologic valve replacement is independently associated with a higher in-hospital and 1-year mortality, a result which is likely related to patient characteristics rather than valve dysfunction.