C. B. Rubinstein

Patent Reviews: 3,201,587; 3,269,253; 3,420,600; 3,421,815; 3,218,916; 3,302,028; 3,422,269; 3,423,146; 3,423,155; 3,427,091; 3,428,388; 3,428,397; 3,431,052; 3,433,141; 3,435,209; 3,435,744; 3,437,410; 3,438,316; 3,440,419; 3,442,193; 3,442,568; 3,443,856; 3,445,156; 3,449,581; 3,442,571; 3,449,587; 3,453,386; 3,454,343; 3,451,740; 3,454,758; 3,454,769; 3,455,223; 3,455,628; 3,457,407; 3,457,416; 3,459,945; 3,460,884; 3,461,290; 3,464,763; 3,464,764; 3,465,155; 3,466,111; 3,466,113; 3,466,114…

Applied Optics (1970)

D. E. Williamson R. L. Hilliard C. F. Mooney J. J. Ball B. J. Howell

The patent number, date of issuance by the U.S. Patent Office, and classification are shown on the first line. The filing date is that of the first application (although some patents may derive from earlier applications with earlier claim dates). Any opinions expressed are those of the reviewers and do not reflect the opinions of the organizations with which they are associated, the Optical Society of America, or this journal. Printed copies of these patents may be ordered from the Commissioner of Patents, Washington, DC 20231: telephone (703) 557-3158, URL http://patents.uspto.gov. Inquiries about patents should be addressed to the Patents Office, not to this journal or to OSA.

Patent office

Line (geometry)

10.1364/ao.9.000978

Cite

Citations (0)

A Comparison of the Optical Faraday Rotation and Magnetic Susceptibility of Cerous Phosphate Glass

Journal of Applied Physics (1964)

S. B. Berger C. B. Rubinstein

The optical Faraday rotation and magnetic susceptibility of cerous phosphate glass of concentration Ce2O3·2.67 P2O5 has been studied as a function of temperature. The Verdet constant exhibits the same temperature dependence as the magnetic susceptibility, consistent with the theory formulated by Van Vleck and Hebb.

Verdet constant

Faraday cage

10.1063/1.1713744

Cite

Citations (9)

Hologram Heterodyne Scanners

Bell System Technical Journal (1968)

L. H. Enloe William C. Jakes C. B. Rubinstein

Several techniques are proposed in this paper which use a scanning coherent light beam to produce an electrical signal which corresponds to a scanned hologram. The hologram itself is not formed at the transmitting end of the system as a physical entity, rather the modulated electrical carrier frequency corresponding to the spatial carrier frequency of the hologram is generated by heterodyning. An advantage of the hologram heterodyne scanner is that it reduces the spatial resolution required of the camera tube in a holographic television system by at least a factor of four.

Heterodyne (poetry)

SIGNAL (programming language)

Heterodyne detection

Spatial frequency

10.1002/j.1538-7305.1968.tb01094.x

Cite

Citations (23)

Crystallographic data for rare-earth aluminum garnets:Part II

American Mineralogist (1965)

C. B. Rubinstein R. L. Barns

Source

Cite

Citations (18)

Patent Reviews: 3,989,890; 3,989,947; 3,994,435; 4,073,574; 4,150,320; 4,164,432; 4,165,913; 4,171,003; 4,165,917; 4,168,882; 4,175,391; 4,222,370; 4,206,494; 4,222,667; 4,225,240; 4,227,076; 4,225,236; 4,226,502; 4,227,769; 4,227,773; 4,228,437; 4,229,073

Applied Optics (1981)

B. J. Howell R. L. Appler D. C. Harper H. Miranda D. L. Sullivan

The patent number, date of issuance by the U.S. Patent Office, and classification are shown on the first line. The filing date is that of the first application (although some patents may derive from earlier applications with earlier claim dates). Any opinions expressed are those of the reviewers and do not reflect the opinions of the organizations with which they are associated, the Optical Society of America, or this journal. Printed copies of these patents may be ordered from the Commissioner of Patents, Washington, DC 20231: telephone (703) 557-3158, URL http://patents.uspto.gov. Inquiries about patents should be addressed to the Patents Office, not to this journal or to OSA.

10.1364/ao.20.000a81

Cite

Citations (0)

Patent Reviews: 3,815,043; 3,815,044; 3,815,046; 3,815,047; 3,818,372; 3,823,061; 3,824,018; 3,825,764; 3,825,856; 3,828,126; 3,829,218; 3,829,219

Applied Optics (1975)

D. J. Lovell J. J. Ball C. F. Mooney R. L. Barns J. W. Nielsen

The patent number, date of issuance by the U.S. Patent Office, and classification are shown on the first line. The filing date is that of the first application (although some patents may derive from earlier applications with earlier claim dates). Any opinions expressed are those of the reviewers and do not reflect the opinions of the organizations with which they are associated, the Optical Society of America, or this journal. Printed copies of these patents may be ordered from the Commissioner of Patents, Washington, DC 20231: telephone (703) 557-3158, URL http://patents.uspto.gov. Inquiries about patents should be addressed to the Patents Office, not to this journal or to OSA.

Line (geometry)

10.1364/ao.14.000a77

Cite

Citations (0)

On the Design of Quantizers for DPCM Coders: A Functional Relationship Between Visibility, Probability and Masking

IRE Transactions on Communications Systems (1978)

J.O. Limb C. B. Rubinstein

Visibility functions measure the relative visibility of noise added to a picture at those points where some measure of local activity exceeds a given threshold. The functions are obtained from a series of subjective experiments and vary with the content of the picture. Visibility functions have been used to design quantizing characteristics for DPCM coding of monochrome and color signals and for three-dimensional transform coding. We consider an alternative approach to determining the visibility function that obviates the need for repeated picture-dependent subjective tests. The visibility function is assumed to consist of two parts, a picture-dependent component and viewer-dependent component (referred to as the masking function). The visibility function may be approximated by the quotient of a probability density function raised to a power and the masking function. The role of probability is found to be weaker where the viewer has more opportunity to scrutinize the picture.

Monochrome

Visibility

10.1109/tcom.1978.1094114

Cite

Citations (41)

Plateau Coding of the Chrominance Component of Color Picture Signals

IEEE Transactions on Communications (1974)

J.O. Limb C. B. Rubinstein

Plateau coding is a method for efficiently coding the chromatic component of color television signals. The signal is divided into regions of approximately constant chromaticity which are transmitted by sending one set of chrominance values for the whole region. Since most changes in chrominance are accompanied by luminance changes, the luminance signal (which must be transmitted quite accurately) is used at the transmitter and receiver to indicate changes in the two chrominance signals; thus no addresses need be sent to define the boundaries of the region at the receiver. Simulations have shown that plateau coding can give pictures of high quality for chrominance bit-rates in the range 0.25-0.5 bits per luminance sample, assuming straightforward pulse-code modulation (PCM) coding of the chrominance amplitudes.

Chrominance

Chromaticity

10.1109/tcom.1974.1092298

Cite

Citations (41)

Comparison of Perceived Color in Two-Primary Computer-Generated Artificial Images with Predictions Based on the Helson–Judd Formulation

Journal of the Optical Society of America (1969)

D.E. Pearson C. B. Rubinstein G. J. Spivack

We describe the results of an experiment designed to test the accuracy of the Helson–Judd formulation in predicting the perceived color of objects in two-primary projections. Five trained subjects gave color-naming responses for hue, lightness, and saturation of perceived color in computer-generated artificial images viewed in red and white projection. The averaged results indicate predictions that are 90% correct for hue, 81% for lightness and 61% for saturation at mesopic luminance levels, and 83% correct for hue, 67% for lightness, and 78% for saturation at photopic luminance levels.

Hue

Mesopic vision

Lightness

Standard illuminant

Primary color

Monochromatic color

Chromaticity

10.1364/josa.59.000644

Cite

Citations (12)

Patent Reviews: 3,183,763; 3,429,635; 3,433,553; 3,438,691; 3,438,692; 3,446,557; 3,447,857; 3,447,875; 3,457,000; 3,472,595; 3,474,280; 3,479,111; 3,479,118; 3,487,215; 3,486,829; 3,487,216; 3,487,227; 3,488,122; 3,488,124; 3,488,491; 3,488,503; 3,489,481; 3,492,596; 3,493,290; 3,493,752; 3,495,910; 3,497,696; 3,497,697

Applied Optics (1970)

D. E. Williamson B. J. Howell E. J. W. Moore J. J. Ball Richard S. Hunter

The patent number, date of issuance by the U.S. Patent Office, and classification are shown on the first line. The filing date is that of the first application (although some patents may derive from earlier applications with earlier claim dates). Any opinions expressed are those of the reviewers and do not reflect the opinions of the organizations with which they are associated, the Optical Society of America, or this journal. Printed copies of these patents may be ordered from the Commissioner of Patents, Washington, DC 20231: telephone (703) 557-3158, URL http://patents.uspto.gov. Inquiries about patents should be addressed to the Patents Office, not to this journal or to OSA.

10.1364/ao.9.002403

Cite

Citations (1)

C. B. Rubinstein

Papers

Citation

H-Index

i-10 index

Papers

Citation

H-Index

i-10 index