Uma pequena parcela dos pacientes com câncer colorretal (CCR) metastático pode ser curada com ressecção da doença metastática, especialmente pacientes com doença de pouco volume hepático e/ou pulmonar.
Abstract Background and Objectives We aimed to describe the routine clinical practice of physicians involved in the treatment of patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in Brazil. Methods Physicians were invited through email and text messages to participate in an electronic survey sponsored by the Brazilian Gastrointestinal Tumor Group (GTG) and the Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology (SBCO). We evaluated the relationship between variable categories numerically with false discovery rate‐adjusted Fisher's exact test p values and graphically with Multiple Correspondence Analysis. Results Overall, 255 physicians answered the survey. Most (52.5%) were medical oncologists, treated patients predominantly in the private setting (71.0%), and had access to multidisciplinary tumor boards (MTDTB; 76.1%). Medical oncologists were more likely to describe neoadjuvant therapy as beneficial in the resectable setting and surgeons in the borderline resectable setting. Most physicians would use information on risk factors for early recurrence, frailty, and type of surgery to decide treatment strategy. Doctors working predominantly in public institutions were less likely to have access to MTDTB and to consider FOLFIRINOX the most adequate regimen in the neoadjuvant setting. Conclusions Considerable differences exist in the management of localized PDAC, some of them possibly explained by the medical specialty, but also by the funding source of health care.
pela Brazilian Journals Publicações de Periódicos e Editora, apresenta um conjunto de dezoito capítulos que reúnem diversas temáticas da área da saúde como um todo.Como um estudo com objetivo de analisar a produção científica sobre a violência obstétrica em mulheres negras, visando avaliar a influência atribuída ao viés racial na determinação da violência obstétrica dentro do contexto do período gravídico-puerperal.Também, um trabalho sobre um relato de perda auditiva irreversível, associada ao uso de paclitaxel, adriamicina e ciclofosfamida, utilizando a revisão de literatura e bases de dados, como: Scielo, Pubmed e Lilacs, e prontuário.Juntamente, uma pesquisa que aborda a percepção da população sobre a relação existente entre o uso de Cannabis sativa, a maconha, e a sua interferência no desenvolvimento de doenças que acometem a saúde mental, utilizando um formulário online, divulgado em território nacional, por meio da ferramenta do Google Forms, para a população adulta, utilizando redes sociais digitais.Também, uma pesquisa que tem como finalidade relatar a experiência de um atendimento clínico em diabetes efetivado por acadêmicos de medicina e docente médica da atenção primária à saúde em uma Unidade Básica de Saúde do município de Marabá/PA.Uma ação de intervenção em saúde foi realizada e, a partir disto, uma análise descritiva do ocorrido foi levantada pelos acadêmicos.Além do mais, um trabalho sobre a influência da perfusão sanguínea e do volume de oxigênio nos índices de agravo em pacientes acometidos pelo vírus da covid-19.Agradecemos os autores que com empenho e dedicação colaboraram para a construção dessa obra.Ansiamos que a mesma contribua de forma significativa no conhecimento das temáticas aqui abordadas.
The work-up of adenocarcinoma of unknown primary usually includes history, physical examination, radiographic imaging, tumor markers, and more recently molecular and genetic information. We report here on how the suggestion by family history of a BRCA1 mutation guided the diagnostic and therapeutic approach in a patient with metastatic carcinoma of unknown primary.BRCA1 mutation was screened for by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and single-strand conformational polymorphism analysis. Primers for PCR amplification included selected BRCA1 exons 2, 110, 11L, 13, and 20. The PCR product was cloned into a PCRII vector and sequenced with a Sequenase Version 2.0 Sequencing Kit.Single-strand conformational polymorphism analysis suggested a mutation in the region of exon 20 and sequencing confirmed the presence of a germline mutation 5382insC.This case illustrates an unusual presentation of adenocarcinoma of unknown primary in a patient with a germline BRCA1 mutation, the use of a suspected germline mutation to guide the work-up and treatment, and finally the value of positron emission tomography scanning in the work-up of an unknown primary.
Abstract Background Tuberous Sclerosis Complex (TSC) is a complex and heterogeneous genetic disease that has well-established clinical diagnostic criteria. These criteria do not include gastrointestinal tumors. Case presentation We report a 45-year-old patient with a clinical and molecular diagnosis of TSC and a family history of cancer, presenting two rare associated findings: gastrointestinal polyposis and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. This patient was subjected to a genetic test with 80 cancer predisposing genes. The genetic panel revealed the presence of a large pathogenic deletion in the TSC2 gene, covering exons 2 to 16 and including the initiation codon. No changes were identified in the colorectal cancer and colorectal polyposis genes. Discussion and conclusions We describe a case of TSC that presented tumors of the gastro intestinal tract that are commonly unrelated to the disease. The patient described here emphasizes the importance of considering polyposis of the gastrointestinal tract and low grade neuroendocrine tumor as part of the TSC syndromic phenotype.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have yielded conflicting results in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The overall effect of ICIs compared with standard therapies in unresectable HCC requires more research.
Objective
To estimate the efficacy and safety associated with ICIs compared with standard therapies in patients with unresectable HCC.
Data Sources
PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature, and American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society of Medical Oncology meeting proceedings were systematically searched. Reference lists from studies selected by electronic searching were manually searched to identify additional relevant studies. The search included literature published or presented from February 2010 to February 2020.
Study Selection
From December 2019 to February 2020, independent reviewers evaluated each database, scanning the title, abstract, and keywords of every record retrieved. Full articles were further assessed if the information given suggested that the study was a randomized clinical trial (RCT) comparing ICIs vs standard therapies in the treatment of unresectable HCC.
Data Extraction and Synthesis
The full text of the resulting studies and extracted data were reviewed independently according to PRISMA guidelines. Summary hazard ratios (HRs) of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated by a random-effects model. The likelihood of ICIs being associated with overall response rate (ORR) and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was expressed by odds ratios (ORs) using a random-effects model.
Main Outcomes and Measures
The main outcomes were OS, PFS, ORR, and TRAEs.
Results
Of 1836 studies yielded by the search, 3 were retained, totaling 1657 patients (985 treated with ICIs vs 672 receiving standard treatment). Two studies evaluated ICIs as monotherapy, and 1 study investigated the combination of ICIs with bevacizumab. Compared with standard therapies (sorafenib in first-line therapy or placebo in second-line therapy), ICIs were associated with significantly improved OS (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.62-0.92;P = .006), PFS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56-0.97;P = .03), and ORR (OR, 2.82; 95% CI 2.02-3.93;P < .001). The probability of grade 3 or 4 TRAEs was lower with ICIs than with sorafenib (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.20-0.96;P = .04).
Conclusions and Relevance
This meta-analysis found superior efficacy and safety associated with ICIs compared with standard therapies and highlights the survival benefit associated with the combination of antiangiogenic therapy with ICIs in first-line systemic therapy of unresectable HCC.
55 Background: Right-sided metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has a worse prognosis and the best first-line treatment is still uncertain. The aim of this study was to analyze progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) comparing triplet versus doublet backbone chemotherapy in first-line setting for right-sided mCRC. Methods: Retrospective study evaluating 510 patients with mCRC who were treated in a private institution in Brazil from January 2011 to December 2019. Information of 118 patients with right-sided primary tumor was analyzed in this study. Demographic and clinical data were retrieved from electronic medical records. PFS and OS were calculated in months (m) using propensity-score weighting analysis (PSWA) due to expected disparity between the number of patients treated with triplet and doublet regimens. Variables used to balance patient groups were age; metastasectomy; primary tumor resection; bevacizumab use; BRAF and RAS mutation status. Results: The median follow-up was 31 months. Our population was mostly composed of elderly (64%) and female (52%) patients. First-line treatment with triplet backbone chemotherapy was done in 16 patients (14%). Primary tumor resection was done in 14% of the cases, 55% underwent metastasectomy, and 57% received anti-VEGF treatment. BRAF mutation was found in 9% of the patients and RAS mutation in 46%. After PSWA we found a significant better median PFS among patients treated with triplet regimen: 12.7m versus 8.9m compared to those receiving doublet backbone chemotherapy, with a hazard ratio of 0.64 (CI 95%: 0.42 – 0.97); p-value: 0.037. No significant difference was found in OS (29.8m versus 45.5m) between triplet and doublet therapy groups, respectively. Conclusions: In our study we found a significantly better PFS with triplet backbone chemotherapy in first-line setting for right-sided mCRC, encouraging the use of this regimen in treatment-naive selected patients. However, no difference in OS was found, probably due to subsequent treatments. PSWA is an acceptable and needed tool to enable retrospective real world studies involving treatments with expected uneven distribution. More studies are needed to answer the best strategy to target right-sided mCRC, which remains a challenge for oncologists, with unmet needs.