Aims and objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic caused an increase in hospitalizations for frail older people and required healthcare professional to make difficult ethical and medical decisions regarding intensive care unit admission and treatment. This study investigates the experiences of healthcare professionals with the use of a decision support tool when discussing treatment limitations with older patients with COVID-19. Methods: A qualitative approach was chosen to obtain further in-depth information on the experiences of the healthcare professionals with the conversations about treatment limitation and on the contribution of a decision support tool for frail older adults with COVID-19. The framework method was used for the data analysis. Results: The following themes illustrate the analyzed concepts for the subject conversations about treatment limitation: careful consideration, the conversation is a part of the job, the burden of the conversation, scheduling conversation and acquiring skills to perform the conversation. The concepts of the theme AGE-ICU evaluation are included in the following themes: considered and comprehensible overview, confirmation of own assessment, every decision is context and person dependent, contributes to considered decision and tool not needed because of own expertise. Conclusion: A decision support tool for older patients with COVID-19 may help the healthcare professional to objectify the patients’ health status and functioning and discuss risk factors for adverse outcomes. Besides this, the tool helps to initiate the difficult conversation with the patient and their family. Finally, the AGE-ICU contributes to shared-decision making because it helps patients to understand the suggested decision and patients are more involved in the decision-making process.
One of the challenges of major surgery is to choose which patients should be admitted electively to the ICU. An ICU admission permits continuous haemodynamic/respiratory monitoring and early intervention or cardiopulmonary support if needed. ICU bed capacity is, however, limited and the costs are high1–3. Patients undergoing elective pulmonary resection are often admitted routinely to the ICU. However, many complications occur several days later and therefore it is unclear whether a postoperative routine ICU admission is usefull4,5. The aim of this study was to develop a prediction model for appropriate routine ICU admission after elective pulmonary resection. The electronic medical records of patients admitted to the ICU after elective pulmonary resection at three tertiary referral hospitals between January 2015 and December 2017 were reviewed. During this interval, all patients undergoing pulmonary resection were admitted routinely to the ICU. Details of anaesthestic and surgical management, criteria for appropriate routine ICU admission, statistical analysis, handling of missing data, and sample size calculation are available in Appendix S1.
Cardiovascular surgery is often complicated by significant bleeding due to perioperative coagulopathy. The effectiveness of treatment with fibrinogen concentrate to reduce the perioperative blood transfusion rate after thoracic aortic replacement surgery in prior studies has shown conflicting results. Therefore, we conducted a double-blind randomized controlled trial to investigate if a single dose of intraoperative fibrinogen administration reduced blood loss and allogeneic transfusion rate after elective surgery for thoracic arch aneurysm with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. Twenty patients were randomized to fibrinogen concentrate ( N = 10) or placebo ( N = 10). The recruitment of study patients was prematurely ended due to a low inclusion rate. Perioperative transfusion, 5-minute bleeding mass after study medication and postoperative blood loss were not different between the groups with fibrinogen concentrate or placebo. Due to small volumes of postoperative blood loss and premature study termination, a beneficial effect of fibrinogen concentrate on the number of blood transfusions could not be established. However, treatment with fibrinogen efficiently restored fibrinogen levels and clot strength to preoperative values with a more effective preserved postoperative thrombin generation capacity. This result might serve as a pilot for further multicenter studies to assess the prospective significance of automated and standardized thrombin generation as a routine assay for monitoring perioperative coagulopathy and its impact on short- and long-term operative results.
Various techniques for administration of blood cardioplegia are used worldwide. In this study, the effect of warm blood cardioplegia administration with or without the use of a roller pump on perioperative myocardial injury was studied in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting using minimal extra-corporeal circuits (MECCs). Sixty-eight patients undergoing elective coronary bypass surgery with an MECC system were consecutively enrolled and randomized into a pumpless group (PL group: blood cardioplegia administration without roller pump) or roller pump group (RP group: blood cardioplegia administration with roller pump). No statistically significant differences were found between the PL group and RP group regarding release of cardiac biomarkers. Maximum postoperative biomarker values reached at T1 (after arrival intensive care unit) for heart-type fatty acid binding protein (2.7 [1.5; 6.0] ng/mL PL group vs. 3.2 [1.6; 6.3] ng/mL RP group, p = .63) and at T3 (first postoperative day) for troponin T high-sensitive (22.0 [14.5; 29.3] ng/L PL group vs. 21.1 [15.3; 31.6] ng/L RP group, p = .91), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (2.1 [1.7; 2.9] ng/mL PL group vs. 2.6 [1.6; 3.6] ng/mL RP group, p = .48), and C-reactive protein (138 [106; 175] μg/mL PL group vs. 129 [105; 161] μg/mL RP group, p = .65). Besides this, blood cardioplegia flow, blood cardioplegia line pressure, and aortic root pressure during blood cardioplegia administration were similar between the two groups. Administration of warm blood cardioplegia with or without the use of a roller pump results in similar clinically acceptable myocardial protection.
ABSTRACT Background Cardiac and inflammatory biomarkers have been associated with adverse outcome after major abdominal surgery. Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) may protect organs from ischemic insults during and after cardiac surgery, but the effect in major abdominal surgery is largely unknown. Objective To study the effect of RIPC on cardiac and inflammatory biomarkers in patients undergoing pancreatic resection. Methods Single-center, double-blind, randomized controlled trial in ninety patients undergoing elective pancreatic resection between March 2017 and February 2019. Three cycles of upper-limb ischemia and reperfusion (each 5 minutes) were applied before surgery. The primary endpoint was the maximum postoperative high-sensitive cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) T concentration within 48 hours after surgery. Secondary endpoints were postoperative myocardial injury (PMI, defined as a postoperative hs-cTnT ≥14 ng L -1 ), the maximum concentration of interleukin (IL)-6 within 48 hours after surgery, and postoperative complications within 30-days of surgery. Results RIPC did not reduce the maximum hs-cTnT concentration after surgery (12.6 ng L -1 vs 16.6 ng L -1 in the control group (P=0.23), nor did it lessen the incidence of PMI (15 (33.3%) patients in the RIPC group versus 19 (42.2%) controls, P=0.93). The maximum postoperative IL-6 concentration was 239 pg mL -1 [115-360] in the RIPC group, as compared to 317 pg mL -1 [174-909] in the control group (P=0.13). A postoperative complication occurred in 23 (51%) RIPC patients and 24 (53%) controls. Conclusions Remote ischemic preconditioning did not reduce the maximum postoperative hs-cTnT concentration. Postoperative myocardial injury, IL-6 concentrations and postoperative complications were not statistically different between RIPC patients and controls. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03460938 Funding Funding for biomarker analysis was provided by Roche Diagnostics. Roche Diagnostics had no role in design and conduct of the study, analysis and interpretation of the data, preparation and approval of the manuscript. Article summary Strengths and limitations of this study Well-designed clinical trial in a selected group of high-risk abdominal surgery patients. Serial assessment of high-sensitive cardiac troponin T and interleukin-6 concentrations. Postoperative cardiac biomarker concentrations were relatively low. This trial was not primarily designed to detect differences in IL-6 concentrations and postoperative complications.
BACKGROUND: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with mortality after cardiac surgery. Novel risk factors may improve identification of patients at risk for renal injury. The authors evaluated the association between preoperative biomarkers that reflect cardiac, inflammatory, renal, and metabolic disorders and cardiac surgery–associated AKI (CSA-AKI) in elderly patients. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of the 2-center prospective cohort study “Anesthesia Geriatric Evaluation.” Twelve biomarkers were determined preoperatively in 539 patients. Primary outcome was CSA-AKI. The association between biomarkers and CSA-AKI was investigated with multivariable logistic regression analysis. Secondary outcomes were 1-year mortality and patient-reported disability and were assessed with relative risks (RR) between patients with and without CSA-AKI. RESULTS: CSA-AKI occurred in 88 (16.3%) patients and was associated with increased risk of mortality (RR, 6.70 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 3.38–13.30]) and disability (RR, 2.13 [95% CI, 1.53–2.95]). Preoperative concentrations of N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), hemoglobin, and magnesium had the strongest association with CSA-AKI. Identification of patients with CSA-AKI improved when a biomarker panel was used (area under the curve [AUC] 0.75 [95% CI, 0.69–0.80]) compared to when only clinical risk factors were used (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation [EuroSCORE II] AUC 0.67 [95% CI, 0.62–0.73]). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative cardiac, inflammatory, renal, and metabolic biomarkers are associated with CSA-AKI and may improve identification of patients at risk.
Cardiovascular complications are important causes of morbidity and mortality following vascular surgery. Adequate preoperative risk assessment and perioperative management may modify postoperative mortality and morbidity and improve long-term prognosis. The objective of this review is to examine the present day knowledge regarding the preoperative evaluation and perioperative management of patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, focusing specifically on abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair.Clinical markers combined with ECG and surgical risk assessment can effectively divide patients in a truly low-risk, intermediate and high-risk population. Low-risk patients can probably be operated on without additional cardiac testing. Notably, due to the surgical risk, AAA patients are never low-risk patients. Intermediate-risk and high-risk patients are referred for cardiac testing to exclude extensive stress induced myocardial ischemia, as beta-blockers provide insufficient myocardial protection in this case and preoperative coronary revascularization might be considered. Whether patients at intermediate risk without ischemic heart disease should be treated with statins and/or beta-blockers is still controversial. In high-risk patients, it is strongly advised to administer beta-blockers with heart rate determined dose adjustment, while the effects of preoperative revascularization remain subject to debate.
Abstract Introduction The views of patients and carers are important for the development of research priorities. This study aimed to determine and compare the top research priorities of cancer patients and carers with those of multidisciplinary clinicians with expertise in prehabilitation. Materials and methods This cross-sectional study surveyed patients recovering from cancer surgery at a major tertiary hospital in Sydney, Australia, and/or their carers between March and July 2023. Consenting patients and carers were provided a list of research priorities according to clinicians with expertise in prehabilitation, as determined in a recent International Delphi study. Participants were asked to rate the importance of each research priority using a 5-item Likert scale (ranging from 1 = very high research priority to 5 = very low research priority). Results A total of 101 patients and 50 carers participated in this study. Four areas were identified as research priorities, achieving consensus of highest importance (> 70% rated as “high” or “very high” priority) by patients, carers, and clinical experts. These were “optimal composition of prehabilitation programs” (77% vs. 82% vs. 88%), “effect of prehabilitation on surgical outcomes” (85% vs. 90% vs. 95%), “effect of prehabilitation on functional outcomes” (83% vs. 86% vs. 79%), and “effect of prehabilitation on patient reported outcomes” (78% vs. 84% vs. 79%). Priorities that did not reach consensus of high importance by patients despite reaching consensus of highest importance by experts included “identifying populations most likely to benefit from prehabilitation” (70% vs. 76% vs. 90%) and “defining prehabilitation core outcome measures” (66% vs. 74% vs. 87%). “Prehabilitation during neoadjuvant therapies” reached consensus of high importance by patients but not by experts or carers (81% vs. 68% vs. 69%). Conclusion This study delineated the primary prehabilitation research priorities as determined by patients and carers, against those previously identified by clinicians with expertise in prehabilitation. It is recommended that subsequent high-quality research and resource allocation be directed towards these highlighted areas of importance.
'%3e%3cpath fill='%23012169' d='M0 0v30h60V0z'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='6' d='m0 0 60 30m0-30L0 30'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23C8102E' stroke-width='4' d='m0 0 60 30m0-30L0 30' clip-path='url(%23b)'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='10' d='M30 0v30M0 15h60'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23C8102E' stroke-width='6' d='M30 0v30M0 15h60'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e)
