Patients with symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) typically have anterior groin pain. However, a subset of these patients may have pain located laterally, posteriorly, or in a combination of locations around the hip.To report and compare outcomes of hip arthroscopy for patients with FAI and atypical hip pain versus classic anterior groin pain.Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.Consecutive patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAI between August 2011 and March 2013 were identified. A total of 258 patients were identified as having symptomatic FAI based on clinical, radiographic, and advanced imaging diagnosis of FAI. Exclusion criteria included isolated thigh, knee, or low back pain. We also excluded patients with hip abductor pathology and trochanteric bursitis. Of the 226 patients ultimately included, 159 (70.4%) reported anterior groin pain, while 67 (29.6%) reported isolated lateral or posterior hip pain or a combination of locations. Patients were categorized into 4 groups: isolated anterior groin pain, lateral hip pain, posterior hip pain, and multiple primary hip pain locations (combined). These patients were followed prospectively with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patient characteristics, surgical characteristics, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Non-arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), revision hip arthroscopy, and conversions to total hip arthroplasty (THA) were recorded.All 226 patients were included at final follow-up. Hip arthroscopy was performed by a single sports medicine fellowship-trained orthopaedic surgeon. Preoperative patient characteristics and baseline functional outcome scores did not significantly differ among groups. All 4 groups showed statistically significant improvements in mHHS and NAHS from baseline to final follow-up of a mean 2.63 years (range, 2.01-3.23 years). Functional outcome scores and rates of revision hip arthroscopy or conversion to THA did not significantly differ between groups.Hip arthroscopy can effectively improve patient outcomes in atypical hip pain. A careful history and physical examination should identify this clinically meaningful subset of patients with FAI who can benefit from surgical intervention while identifying patients with concomitant posterior extra-articular hip or spine pathology that should be addressed appropriately.
PURPOSE This study systematically reviewed the literature for outcomes following revision surgery for a failed prior Latarjet procedure. METHODS Two independent reviewers performed the literature search based on PRISMA guidelines using the EMBASE, MEDLINE, and The Cochrane Library databases. Studies in which the Latarjet procedure was performed as a revision procedure following failed prior shoulder instability surgery were included. Clinical outcomes analyzed were: 1. functional outcomes, 2. recurrent instability, 3. range of motion, and 4. COMPLICATIONS Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS. RESULTS There were seven studies with 161 patients (162 shoulders) included. Four studies used a bone-block procedure, three used arthroscopic soft-tissue stabilization, and the mean follow-up was 49.8 months. The most commonly reported functional outcome measure was the Rowe score, with a weighted mean average of 79.7, with 82.9% of patients having good to excellent outcomes. Return to play was possible for 73.8% of patients, with 64.2% of those returning to at least the same level of competition. The overall recurrence rate was 9.5%, with 3.6% and 5.9% experiencing recurrent dislocations and subluxations, respectively. The overall revision rate was 4.2%, with all patients undergoing revisions due to recurrence. There were no reported neurovascular complications. Instability arthropathy was reported in 43.3% of patients. CONCLUSION Surgical management following a failed Latarjet procedure results in moderate rates of recurrent instability and has a low intraoperative and postoperative complication rate. Additionally, the results across all techniques appear similar, with no procedure being identified as the gold-standard in the literature. However, there was a concerning rate of instability arthropathy, which may be related to the failure of a bony procedure.
BACKGROUND Female ice hockey players have rates of sports-related concussion that are similar to male participants at various levels of play, despite differences in the rules that do not allow for body checking in the women's game. At the elite level, there are limited data regarding concussion rates and concussion symptom reporting. Therefore, it was hypothesized that there would be a high incidence of concussion and concussion symptom-reporting in professional women's ice hockey players. METHODS A survey was given to 54 players in the National Women's Hockey League at the end of the 2018-2019 season. Players reported on the number of concussions diagnosed by a physician throughout their careers, the number of times they have had concussion symptoms, if they had ever continued playing after experiencing concussion symptoms, and if they had ever failed to report concussion symptoms to a medical professional or coach. RESULTS Fifty-four players completed the survey. Thirtyone (57%) respondents reported at least one concussion diagnosed during their playing career, with 16 (30%) reporting two or more diagnosed concussions. Thirty-six (67%) players reported experiencing concussion symptoms at least once, with 26 (48%) reporting two or more occurrences of such symptoms. Of the 36 players who had experienced symptoms of concussion, 25 (69%) reported that they continued playing at least once after experiencing concussion symptoms. Seventeen players (36%) reported that they did not initially tell anyone about their concussion symptoms on at least one occasion, while seven players (19%) never disclosed their symptoms. CONCLUSION There is a high incidence of sport-related concussions reported in women's professional ice hockey players as well as an alarming rate of symptom nonreporting. CLINICAL RELEVANCE This study provides new data on rates of concussion and symptom non-reporting among female professional ice hockey players and will aid clinicians in decision making when caring for these athletes.
Background: A major byproduct of the recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been the accelerated adoption of telemedicine within orthopedic practices.
