The ATOH7 gene has been previously associated with glaucoma and glaucoma-related traits, such as disc size and cup/disc ratio (CDR). CDR is an important part of the glaucoma phenotype, whereas the relationship between the disc size and the disease is not well understood. The aim of this study was to investigate whether ATOH7 is associated independently with CDR or merely with the size of the optic disc.
Method
We carried out an association analysis for a candidate region, including ATOH7 for two populations: the Blue Mountains Eye Study and the TwinsUK cohort. We performed three linear regression models for (1) disc size adjusted on age, sex and intraocular pressure (IOP), (2) CDR adjusted on age, sex and IOP and (3) CDR adjusted on age, sex, IOP and disc size.
Results
A strong signal was found at rs7916697 for disc size. This single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) was also associated with CDR adjusted on age, sex and IOP. However, this SNP was not associated with CDR when adjusted on age, sex, IOP and also disc size.
Conclusions
This study finds that ATOH7 is associated with optic disc size but not independently with CDR.
To compare real-world 24-month outcomes of phacoemulsification combined with either iStent inject or Hydrus Microstent.Analysis of data from the Fight Glaucoma Blindness (FGB) international registry. Anonymized data from 344 eyes with mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma, normal-tension glaucoma or ocular hypertension that underwent phacoemulsification combined with either iStent inject (224) or Hydrus Microstent (120) were included. Data were adjusted for baseline characteristics using linear regression and propensity score matching. The primary endpoint was a comparison of mean intraocular pressure (IOP) at 24 months.At 24 months, there was no significant difference in IOP reduction between the two groups, consistent across all analyses. The matched cohort showed iStent inject achieved 3.1 mmHg reduction and Hydrus a 2.3 mmHg reduction (p = 0.530) and a mean medication reduction of 1.0 for iStent inject versus 0.5 for Hydrus (p = 0.081). 5.4% of eyes in the iStent inject group and 7.5% of eyes in the Hydrus group required subsequent procedures to improve IOP control within 24 months. Complications were rare with no significant differences between the groups.Twenty-four-month outcomes showed sustained IOP reduction with a good safety profile for both groups. There was no significant difference in IOP outcomes between the groups. There may be a small additional reduction in glaucoma medication usage following cataract surgery with iStent inject compared to Hydrus.