SUMMARY In efforts to better characterize incidence and predictors of 30- and 90-day mortality following operative versus nonoperative approaches for locally advanced esophageal cancer (EC), we conducted a novel investigation of a large, contemporary US database. The National Cancer Database was queried for newly-diagnosed T1–3N0–1 squamous cell or adenocarcinoma receiving surgical-based therapy (esophagectomy alone or preceded by chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy) versus definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). Statistics included graphing cumulative incidences of mortality before and following propensity score matching (PSM), based on age-based intervals. Cox regression determined factors independently predictive of 30- and 90-day mortality. Of 15,585 patients, 9,278 (59.5%) received surgical-based therapy and 6,307 (40.5%) underwent dCRT. In the unadjusted population, despite nonsignificant differences at 30 days (3.3% dCRT, 3.6% surgical-based), the dCRT cohort experienced higher 90-day mortality (11.0% vs. 7.5%, P < 0.001). Following PSM, however, dCRT patients experienced significantly lower 30-day mortality (P < 0.001), with nonsignificant differences at 90 days (P = 0.092). Surgical-based management yielded similar (or better) mortality as dCRT in ≤70-year-old patients; however, dCRT was associated with reduced mortality in subjects > 70 years old. In addition to the intervention group, factors predictive for 30- and 90-day mortality included age, gender, insurance status, facility type, comorbidity index, tumor location, histology, and T/N classification. In summary, surgical-based therapy for EC is associated with higher 30-day mortality, which becomes statistically similar to dCRT by 90 days. Differences between surgery and dCRT were most pronounced in patients > 70 years of age. These data may better inform shared decision-making between multidisciplinary providers and patients.
Supplementary Table from A Phase 2 Trial of Enhancing Immune Checkpoint Blockade by Stereotactic Radiation and <i>In Situ</i> Virus Gene Therapy in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Supplementary Figure from A Phase 2 Trial of Enhancing Immune Checkpoint Blockade by Stereotactic Radiation and <i>In Situ</i> Virus Gene Therapy in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Supplementary Table from A Phase 2 Trial of Enhancing Immune Checkpoint Blockade by Stereotactic Radiation and <i>In Situ</i> Virus Gene Therapy in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is gaining wide acceptance as a treatment modality for lung and liver tumors, and it is crucial to make an accurate evaluation of the local effects of ablative doses of radiation in terms of local tumor control and normal tissue reaction or damage. The very complex radiation dose distribution of SBRT, the use of a large number of non-opposing and noncoplanar beams, and the delivery of individual ablative doses of radiation may cause substantially different radiographic appearance on diagnostic imaging compared with conventional radiation therapy. Different patterns of radiographic changes have been observed in the lung and liver after SBRT. This article reviews the post-SBRT imaging changes in the lung and liver. Since computed tomography and PET are the most commonly used diagnostic imaging tools for monitoring lung tumor and computed tomography for liver tumors, this article will focus on the changes observed on those imaging modalities.
