Abstract Background COVID‐19 can have a particularly detrimental effect on patients with cancer, but no studies to date have examined if the presence, or site, of metastatic cancer is related to COVID‐19 outcomes. Methods Using the COVID‐19 and Cancer Consortium (CCC19) registry, the authors identified 10,065 patients with COVID‐19 and cancer (2325 with and 7740 without metastasis at the time of COVID‐19 diagnosis). The primary ordinal outcome was COVID‐19 severity: not hospitalized, hospitalized but did not receive supplemental O 2 , hospitalized and received supplemental O 2 , admitted to an intensive care unit, received mechanical ventilation, or died from any cause. The authors used ordinal logistic regression models to compare COVID‐19 severity by presence and specific site of metastatic cancer. They used logistic regression models to assess 30‐day all‐cause mortality. Results Compared to patients without metastasis, patients with metastases have increased hospitalization rates (59% vs. 49%) and higher 30 day mortality (18% vs. 9%). Patients with metastasis to bone, lung, liver, lymph nodes, and brain have significantly higher COVID‐19 severity (adjusted odds ratios [ORs], 1.38, 1.59, 1.38, 1.00, and 2.21) compared to patients without metastases at those sites. Patients with metastasis to the lung have significantly higher odds of 30‐day mortality (adjusted OR, 1.53; 95% confidence interval, 1.17–2.00) when adjusting for COVID‐19 severity. Conclusions Patients with metastatic cancer, especially with metastasis to the brain, are more likely to have severe outcomes after COVID‐19 whereas patients with metastasis to the lung, compared to patients with cancer metastasis to other sites, have the highest 30‐day mortality after COVID‐19.
Androgen deprivation therapy is a well-established standard of care for the management of metastatic prostate cancer; however, recent studies have investigated additional therapeutic options, escalation strategies, and primary directed therapy for patients with advanced disease. Treatment decisions are based on clinical parameters, disease characteristics, and patient factors. At the NCCN 2023 Annual Conference, a panel of experts used 3 case studies to develop an evidence-based approach for the treatment of patients with metastatic prostate cancer. The session focused on the current research regarding both systemic and local therapy options in each clinical context.
Background: Little is known about the prevalence of germline alterations in Hispanic men with prostate cancer (PC). Here, we examine the rates of germline alterations in Hispanic men with PC, compare these rates to non-Hispanic white men, and examine factors associated with clinicians offering testing. Methods: Single center, retrospective analysis of patients (pts) with PC who self-identify as Hispanic and meet the NCCN criteria for germline testing. Pts who consented for testing underwent a commercial multigene germline assay. Among those tested, the proportion of pathogenic alterations and variants of uncertain significance (VUS) were computed in 20 genes associated with germline alterations in PC. This was compared to non-Hispanic white (NHW) pts who also underwent germline testing. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to assess clinical and demographic factors associated with clinicians offering germline testing and/or genetics referral. Results: We identified 136 Hispanic men with PC eligible for germline testing between 2018-2020. 26.1% (n=34) of pts underwent germline testing and among those tested, 14.7% (n=5/34) had a pathogenic alteration detected. Median age of the cohort was 70 years and 46.3% (n=63) had metastatic disease. Spanish was the primary language for 50% (n=68) and 14.0% (n=19) of pts had at least 1 first-degree relative with PC. Alterations were detected in ATM (n=2), CHEK2 (n=1), MSH2 (n=1), MSH6 (n=1). When stratified by disease status, the rate of pathogenic alterations was 7.7% (n=1/13) in localized and 19.0% (n=4/21) in metastatic disease. When compared to NHW pts who underwent testing (n=139), the rate of pathogenic alterations was not significantly different (14.7% in Hispanic vs 12.2% in NWH, p=0.77). The rate of VUS in Hispanic pts was significantly higher than NHW pts (20.6% in Hispanic vs 7.2% in NWH, p=0.047). In a multivariate model examining the factors associated with receipt of testing in Hispanic men (Table), the presence of metastatic disease and a family history of PC were positively associated with testing. Spanish as a primary language was negatively associated with testing. Age was not a significant predictor. Conclusions: Among Hispanic men who underwent germline testing, there was a similar rate of pathogenic germline alterations compared to NHW men. Among Hispanic men, primary Spanish speakers appear to have lower rates of germline testing. Bilingual strategies are needed to improve rates of testing to ensure equity in germline testing for all patients. [Table: see text]
119 Background: Radium-223 is an α-emitting radioisotope that induces DNA double-strand breaks leading to cell death. In preclinical models, PARP inhibitors have shown efficacy as radiosensitizing agents. We designed a phase 1/2 trial to test the safety and efficacy of radium-223 + olaparib. Tissue based studies investigated homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene status. Methods: This was an open-label, multi-center, phase 1/2 study (NCT03317392) evaluating the dosing, safety and efficacy of radium-223 + olaparib. Eligible patients (pts) had mCRPC with ≥2 bone metastases without visceral metastases or lymphadenopathy > 4 cm. There was no limit on prior therapy. All pts had a baseline biopsy and archival tissue was collected when available. The phase 1 used a 3+3 dose escalation design with fixed dose radium-223 (55 kBq/kg IV every 4 weeks x 6). Dose level 1 (DL1) was olaparib 200 mg PO BID; DL2 was olaparib 300 mg PO BID. The primary objective was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Secondary objectives included radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) (PCWG3 criteria), PSA response (50% decline from baseline), and alkaline phosphatase response (30% decline from baseline). HRR gene status was determined using Oncopanel tissue profiling. Results: 12 pts were enrolled on the phase 1. Median age was 68 (range 59-81) years. Median prior lines of CRPC therapies was 2 (1-5), including 3 (25%) who had received prior chemotherapy and 12 (100%) a prior novel hormone therapy. The RP2D of olaparib was 200 mg BID when combined with radium-223. Overall, PSA response and alkaline phosphatase response were 16.7% (n=2) and 67% (n=8), respectively. Median follow-up was 6.5 (range 2.8, 11.8) months, and 6-month rPFS was 57% (95% CI: 25%, 80%). 9 patients had available tissue for Oncopanel testing (7 from baseline metastasis biopsy; 2 from archival prostate tissue). Two patients were identified to have pathogenic HRR gene alterations: 1 patient with a BRCA2 mutation with rPFS of 11.63 months, 1 patient with CDK12 mutation with rPFS 2.60 months (Table). Conclusions: We demonstrate that olaparib can be safety combined with radium-223 with RP2D of 200 mg BID. Though limited by sample size, we demonstrate prolonged disease control in a pt with a BRCA2 mutation receiving radium-223 + olaparib. Additional profiling from the currently accruing phase 2 study of radium-223 +/- olaparib will further elucidate biomarkers of response. Clinical trial information: NCT03317392. [Table: see text]
TPS5128 Background: Patients with localized high-risk prostate cancer have an increased risk of relapse following RP. Approximately 6% of patients with high-risk disease harbor germline alterations in the DNA repair pathway, of which BRCA1/2 alterations are the most common. Patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations have higher rates of aggressive disease, distant metastases, and worse survival compared to non-carriers. Olaparib is a PARP inhibitor which demonstrates improved overall survival in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer with BRCA1/2 germline and somatic alterations. Additionally, olaparib has demonstrated improved invasive disease-free survival as adjuvant therapy in patients with germline BRCA1/2 HER-2 negative breast cancer. Novel, multimodal treatment strategies for patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer with germline or somatic BRCA1/2 may improve outcomes for these patients. Methods: We designed a multicenter phase 2 single arm study evaluating neoadjuvant olaparib in combination with a LHRH agonist for 6 months followed by RP. Eligible patients include those with a Gleason score ≥4+3=7, PSA >20 ng/mL or T3 disease (by DRE or prostate MRI) and lymph node <20 mm. Patients with intraductal carcinoma are eligible independent of Gleason score, PSA, or T stage. Patients must have a germline or somatic BRCA1/2pathogenic or likely pathogenic alterations identified on standard of care molecular profiling. Eligible patients receive olaparib 300 mg by mouth twice daily and a LHRH agonist for 6 months followed by RP. The primary endpoint is the rate of a pathologic complete response (pCR) or minimum residual disease (MRD, tumor ≤5 mm) as determined by central pathology review. Secondary endpoints include PSA response, surgical staging at RP, positive margin rate, time to testosterone recovery, and safety. Exploratory endpoints include quality of life assessment, proportion of downstaging on multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI), correlation of mpMRI with pathologic response, and tissue based molecular predictors of response and resistance. The sample size was estimated based a Binomial Exact test to assess the null hypothesis of the pCR/MRD rate ≤10% with one-sided 5% significance level. If the observed rate from this study is ≥32.5%, to have 90% power to conclude that the pCR/MRD rate is above 10%, a total of 30 patients will be enrolled. We can reject the null hypothesis if there are at least 7 responses. This trial is enrolling patients through the Hoosier Cancer Research Network. The study is activated at the University of California San Diego, University of Pennsylvania, and Johns Hopkins Hospital. Sites pending activation include: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University, and University of Buffalo. Clinical trial information: NCT05498272 .
390 Background:The concept of primary systemic therapy has gained increasing traction in the management of metastatic and locally advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC). Most series have evaluated the use of tyrosine-kinase inhibitors, however, with the emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy as first line agents in advanced RCC, further assessment of efficacy is warranted. We examined the effects of immunotherapy (IO) combinations on the primary tumor and consequent surgical quality and short-term oncological outcomes. Methods: We conducted a multi-center, retrospective analysis of patients with advanced/metastatic RCC having received IO followed by Radical (RN) or partial nephrectomy (PN). Primary outcome was achievement of Bifecta (composite outcome of complete resection and no 30-day post-operative complications). Predictors for achievement of Bifecta were assessed with logistic regression multivariable analysis. Secondary outcomes were change in maximal tumor dimension, RENAL nephrometry score and disease progression. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess progression-free survival (PFS) for Bifecta and non-Bifecta patients. Results: We identified 52 patients with advanced RCC across 9 institutions who were eligible. The median age was 63 years and 60.4% were males. Median tumor size at diagnosis was 9.3 cm. 19.6% had T4 disease and 75% had AJCC Stage IV disease. IO treatment resulted in significant reductions in median tumor size (-25.4%; 9.7 cm vs. 7.3cm p = 0.0129) and RENAL nephrometry score (9 to 8, p = 0.032). 43 (83%) of patients underwent RN and (9) 17% had PN. Median tumor size was smaller for PN (8 vs. 4.1 cm, p < 0.001), and 30 day complication rates were higher (p = 0.024). Bifecta was achieved in 39 patients [33/42 (78.6%) RN and 6/9 (67%) PN, p = 0.264). Predictors for achievement of Bifecta were younger age (OR 1.06, p = 0.01), increasing reduction in tumor size (OR 1.187, p < 0.001), and shorter time between therapy and surgery (OR 1.07, p < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated longer median time to progression in the Bifecta-positive group compared to patients who failed to achieve Bifecta (75 vs. 30 months, p = 0.04). Conclusions: Pre-surgical therapy resulted in tumor size and complexity reduction. Tumor size reduction was predictive for achievement of Bifecta, which was associated with improved short term oncological outcomes. To our knowledge, this is the first series evaluating the effect of neoadjuvant systemic therapy on the primary tumor prior to surgical intervention.
TPS430 Background: Patients with localized high-risk prostate cancer face an elevated risk of recurrence after radical prostatectomy (RP). Approximately 6% of these patients carry germline mutations in DNA repair pathways, most commonly involving BRCA1/2 genes. These mutations are linked to more aggressive disease, a higher likelihood of distant metastasis, and worse survival outcomes compared to those without them. Olaparib, a PARP inhibitor, has improved overall survival in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with BRCA1/2 germline or somatic mutations. Additionally, olaparib has shown efficacy as adjuvant therapy in improving invasive disease-free survival in patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations and HER2-negative breast cancer. Multimodal treatment strategies for high-risk localized prostate cancer patients with BRCA1/2 mutations, whether germline or somatic, may improve clinical outcomes. Methods: We initiated a multicenter, phase 2, single-arm study to evaluate neoadjuvant olaparib combined with an LHRH agonist for 6 months, followed by radical prostatectomy (RP). Eligible patients include those with a Gleason score ≥4+3=7, PSA >20 ng/mL, or T3 disease (determined by DRE or prostate MRI) with lymph nodes <20 mm. Patients with intraductal carcinoma are eligible regardless of Gleason score, PSA level, or T stage. All participants must have germline or somatic BRCA1/2 pathogenic or likely pathogenic alterations identified through standard of care molecular profiling. Eligible patients will receive olaparib 300 mg orally twice daily along with an LHRH agonist for 6 months before undergoing RP. The primary endpoint is the rate of pathologic complete response (pCR) or minimal residual disease (MRD, defined as tumor ≤5 mm) as assessed by central pathology review. Secondary endpoints include PSA response, surgical staging at RP, positive margin rate, time to testosterone recovery, and safety. Exploratory endpoints include quality of life assessments, the proportion of downstaging observed on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), correlation of mpMRI findings with pathologic response, and tissue-based molecular predictors of response and resistance. Sample size was calculated using a Binomial Exact test to evaluate the null hypothesis of a pCR/MRD rate ≤10% at a one-sided 5% significance level. Assuming an observed rate of ≥32.5% in this study, to conclude that the pCR/MRD rate is above 10% with 90% power, a total of 30 patients will be enrolled. At least 7 responses are needed to reject the null hypothesis. This trial is enrolling through the Hoosier Cancer Research Network, with active sites at the University of California San Diego, University of Pennsylvania, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Columbia University, and the University of Buffalo. Clinical trial information: NCT05498272 .
