Uncertainty of Measurement (UM) is defined [ISO15189 (3.17)] as “a parameter associated with the result of a measurand that characterises the dispersion of values.”2
In the clinical laboratory, similar information has long been available in the form of the Standard Deviation (SD) as a measure of imprecision. Thus the current discussion is about an old concept that is routinely measured and available from all accredited laboratories. What is therefore surprising is that UM is causing such anxiety and interest when it is so familiar to laboratory professionals. Perhaps some are concerned that highlighting UM issues may be interpreted by clinicians as a confession of previously undisclosed “laboratory error”.
Although UM may not be a new idea for the laboratory, the present emphasis on the statistics tends to overlook the far greater problem of over-interpretation of results by clinicians. There are several areas where uncertainty in laboratory results can cause clinical problems. Examples are given below, as well as suggestions as to how guidelines on UM could be extended to provide useful information to clinical users.
Objective: To determine the effect on renal function of postoperative low-dose dopamine in volume-replete patients after elective, major vascular abdominal surgery. Design: Randomized, double-blind...
Background In a previous longitudinal analysis of our cohort as 8 to 10 year-olds, insulin resistance (IR) increased with age, but was not modified by changes in percent body fat (%BF), and was only responsive to changes in physical activity (PA) in boys. We aimed to determine whether these responses persisted as the children approached adolescence. Methods In this prospective cohort study, 256 boys and 278 girls were assessed at ages 8, 10 and 12 years for fasting blood glucose and insulin, %BF (dual energy X-ray absorptiometry); PA (7-day pedometers), fitness (multistage run); and pubertal development (Tanner stage). Results From age 8 to 12 years, the median homeostatic model of IR (HOMA-IR) doubled in boys and increased 250% in girls. By age 12, 23% of boys and 31% of girls had elevated IR, as indicated by HOMA-IR greater than 3. Longitudinal relationships, with important adjustments for covariates body weight, PA, %BF, Tanner score and socioeconomic status showed that, on average, for every 1 unit reduction of %BF, HOMA-IR was lowered by 2.2% (95% CI 0.04–4) in girls and 1.6% (95% CI 0–3.2) in boys. Furthermore, in boys but not girls, HOMA-IR was decreased by 3.5% (95%CI 0.5–6.5) if PA was increased by 2100 steps/day. Conclusion Evidence that a quarter of our apparently healthy 12 year-old Australians possessed elevated IR suggests that community-based education and prevention strategies may be warranted. Responsiveness of IR to changes in %BF in both sexes during late preadolescence and to changes in PA in the boys provides a specific basis for targeting elevated IR. That body weight was a strong covariate of IR, independent of %BF, points to the importance of adjusting for weight in correctly assessing these relationships in growing children.
OBJECTIVE--To estimate the prevalence of important side effects in patients with malignant disease who were receiving high doses of morphine as part of their palliative treatment. DESIGN--Data on patients were collected over 12 months. SETTING--Two palliative care units in Western Australia. PATIENTS--19 Patients with malignant disease who were receiving morphine either subcutaneously or orally as the main analgesic. 10 Patients receiving a total daily dose of morphine of at least 500 mg orally or 250 mg parenterally were enrolled in the study. The other 9 patients were enrolled after an important problem thought to be related to the morphine had been identified. All of the patients were taking drugs to supplement the treatment. INTERVENTIONS--The dose of morphine or route of administration, or both, was changed in three patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Determination of the prevalence of side effects in the patients. Assessment of the relation of any side effects with the supplemental drugs taken by the patients. MAIN RESULTS--Plasma morphine and electrolyte concentrations were measured and a full history taken for each patient. Thirteen of the 19 patients had an important side effect; 12 of them had myoclonus and one had hyperalgesia of the skin. Plasma morphine concentrations were similar in patients with and without myoclonus, ranging from 158 to 3465 nmol/l and 39 to 2821 nmol/l respectively. Eight of the patients with side effects were taking an antipsychotic drug concurrently compared with none of those without side effects. A greater proportion of patients with side effects were taking the antinauseant drug thiethylperazine (6/13 v 2/6) and at least one non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (10/13 v 2/6), whereas a smaller proportion were taking a glucocorticosteroid (3/13 v 4/6). The estimated prevalence of important side effects in the total population of patients receiving palliative treatment in the two units was 2.7-3.6%. CONCLUSIONS--Myoclonus as a side effect of treatment with morphine is more likely to occur in patients taking antidepressant or antipsychotic drugs as antiemetics or as adjuvant agents or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for additional analgesia. If a patient develops myoclonus the best approach may be to change the supplemental treatment.
A 74-year-old man with myxedema and hypothermia had increased activities in plasma of creatine kinase (CK; EC 2.7.3.2), aspartate aminotransferase (AST; EC 2.6.1.1), and lactate dehydrogenase (LD; EC 1.1.1.27) and increased proportions of CK-MB (up to 20% of total CK) and LD1 isoenzymes, but no clinical or investigational evidence of associated myocardial infarction. This case illustrates that plasma enzyme activity and isoenzyme profiles in such clinical settings should be interpreted with caution, because increases in CK-MB and LD1 may relate to myxedema coma or hypothermia (or both) rather than to myocardial infarction.