Between September 1976 and May 1980, 135 patients with operable breast cancer and positive axillary nodes received l-phenylalanine mustard, adjunct to surgery, 0.15 mg/kg for five days, six weekly, and were randomised prospectively to levamisole 150 mg for three days, two weekly, or a placebo. Treatment was continued for two years or until evidence of treatment failure, whichever was the sooner. At 4 1/2 years, for all patients, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.09), but in a subgroup of women ⩽50 with 1–3 positive nodes, levamisole had a negative effect (P = 0.05). Although an analysis of the same age group, independent of the nodal status, did not reach significance, there was a trend in favor of placebo (P = 0.08) which was also apparent in premenopausal women (P = 0.15). In postmenopausal patients, however, and in those with more advanced disease with four or more positive nodes, although the results also failed to reach significance the trend in these subgroups favored levamisole. The results of this study suggest that levamisole has no place in the primary therapy of breast cancer in younger women and those with more favorable disease. The value of this agent in older patients and those with more advanced primary disease, remains unproven, but the favorable trends are in accord with a number of other studies with levamisole in metastatic breast and resectable lung cancer. Retrospective analysis confined to those women who received 75% or more of the total dose of l-phenylalanine mustard showed no evidence for a dose-responsive effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on the described pattern of results.
1. Patients with moderate to severe hypertension were studied during a 12 weeks period, while taking a slow-release formulation of oxprenolol once daily, in a dose equal to their previous total daily dose of oxprenolol given in divided doses. 2. There were no significant differences between blood pressure at the beginning and end of the 12 weeks period. 3. Once-daily dosage offers advantages of patient compliance.
Background: In the context of post-transplant immunosuppression, cyclosporine A (CSA) is dose adjusted in accordance with whole blood drug monitoring. While currently available immunoassay systems primarily target the parent drug, cross-reactivity results in the detection of the major circulating CSA metabolites, though their contribution to both immunosuppression and toxicity remain unclear. This study examines the relationship of CSA metabolites to hepatic and renal dysfunction and the incidence of graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) through parallel assaying of parent drug and drug/metabolites expressed as a metabolite ratio (Cp:mR). Method: Sequential pre-treatment (trough) whole blood samples ( n = 527) were collected from 31 allo-stem cell transplantation (SCT) recipients. Both parent drug and drug/metabolite levels were determined using the Abbott fluorescence polarization immunoassay. Results: The average mean Cp:mR was significantly higher in patients with hepatic ( P = 0.004) and renal dysfunction ( P = 0.004) than in those without. Significantly higher Cp:mR were also found in patients with grades II-IV GvHD ( P = 0.001) than were observed in patients who did not experience significant GvHD. When measured prospectively, an increasing Cp:mR predated the rise in serum creatinine concentration by a median of two weeks. Conclusions: This study demonstrates a clinically useful CSA metabolite ratio that shows association with hepatic and renal dysfunction and with GvHD. The measure can be used to predict those patients on CSA therapy who are likely to develop renal dysfunction.