// Elizabeth A. Mittendorf 1,* , Alexandros Ardavanis 2 , Jennifer K. Litton 3 , Nathan M. Shumway 4 , Diane F. Hale 5 , James L. Murray 3 , Sonia A. Perez 2 , Sathibalan Ponniah 6 , Constantin N. Baxevanis 2 , Michael Papamichail 2 and George E. Peoples 7,* 1 Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA 2 Cancer Immunology and Immunotherapy Center, St. Savas Cancer Hospital, Athens, Greece 3 Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA 4 Department of Hematology/Oncology, Brooke Army Medical Center, Ft. Sam Houston, TX, USA 5 Department of Surgery, Brooke Army Medical Center, Ft. Sam Houston, TX, USA 6 Cancer Vaccine Development Laboratory, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA 7 Cancer Vaccine Development Program, San Antonio, TX, USA * These authors have contributed equally to this work Correspondence to: Elizabeth A. Mittendorf, email: // George E. Peoples, email: // Keywords : vaccine, cytotoxic T lymphocytes, breast cancer, HER2, trastuzumab Received : February 07, 2016 Accepted : July 09, 2016 Published : August 31, 2016 Abstract GP2 is a HER2-derived, HLA-A2+ restricted peptide. Phase I studies showed GP2 administered with GM-CSF to be safe and immunogenic. Here we report the primary analysis of a prospective, randomized, multicenter phase II adjuvant trial conducted to determine the vaccine’s efficacy. The trial enrolled HLA-A2+, clinically disease-free, node-positive and high-risk node-negative breast cancer patients with tumors expressing HER2 (immunohistochemistry[IHC] 1+-3+). Patients were randomized to GP2+GM-CSF versus GM-CSF alone. Disease-free survival (DFS) was analyzed in intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-treatment cohorts; pre-specified subgroup analyses were performed for patients with IHC 3+ or FISH+ disease. The trial enrolled 180 patients; 89 received GP2+GM-CSF and 91 received GM-CSF alone. The groups were well-matched for clinicopathologic characteristics. Toxicities have been minimal. The Kaplan-Meier estimated 5-year DFS rate in the ITT analyses was 88% (95% CI:78-94%) in vaccinated vs . 81% (95% CI:69-89%) ( P = 0.43) in control patients after a 34 month median follow-up. In the per-treatment analysis, the estimated 5-year DFS rates were 94% (95% CI:83-98%) and 85% (73-92%) ( P = 0.17). In IHC 3+/FISH+ patients, the estimated 5-year DFS rate was 94% (82-98%) in vaccinated patients ( n = 51) vs . 89% (71-96%) in control patients ( n = 50), ( P = 0.86) in the ITT analyses and 100% vs . 89% (71-96%) in vaccinated vs . control patients in the per-treatment analyses ( P = 0.08). While the overall ITT analysis did not demonstrate benefit to vaccination, this trial confirmed that the GP2 vaccine is safe and suggests that vaccination may have clinical activity, particularly in patients with HER2 overexpression who received the full vaccine series (ie per-treatment group).
Acquired immune resistance (AIR) describes a situation in which cancer patients who initially responded clinically to immunotherapies, after a certain period of time, progress with their disease. Considering that AIR represents a feedback response of the tumor against the immune attack generated during the course of immunotherapies, it is conceivable that AIR may also occur before treatment initiation as a mechanism to escape endogenous adaptive antitumor immunity (EAAI). In the present study, we assessed the EAAI in paraffin-embedded breast primary tumor tissue samples and drew correlations with the clinical outcomes. In particular, we analyzed densities of CD8+ cells as elements mediating antitumor cytotoxicity, and of CD163+ and FoxP3+ cells as suppressor elements. We found a direct correlation between the densities of CD8+ cells and of CD163+ and/or FoxP3+ cells in the vast majority of patients’ tumors. Importantly, the vast majority of patients whose tumors were overpopulated by CD8+ cells developed AIR, which was characterized by high intratumoral CD163+ and/or FoxP3+ cell densities and reduced overall survival (OS). We also showed that AIR depends on the levels of CD8+ cell-ratios in the tumor center to the invasive margin. Our data suggest that tumors develop AIR only when under a robust endogenous immune pressure.
Background: Cancer patients are at high risk for cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). CAT is the second leading cause of death in these patients but it can be preventable with thromboprophylaxis. Patients and Methods: An observational, prospective, multicenter study aiming to record CAT management in clinical practice was conducted by the Hellenic Society of Medical Oncology (HeSMO). Results: A total of 426 active cancer patients (mean age 65.3 years, mean BMI: 26.1 kg/m2) who received thromboprophylaxis, were included from 18 oncology units. Tumor types were lung 25.1%, pancreas 13.9%, breast 8.7%, stomach 8.5%, ovarian 7.8%, and others 36%, while 69% had metastases. A total of 71% had a Khorana score ≤2 and 61% received High Thrombotic Risk Chemotherapy Agents (HTRCAs, e.g., platinum). For thromboprophylaxis patients received mainly Low Molecular Weight Heparins (LMWHs), on higher than prophylactic doses in 50% of cases. Overall, 16 (3.8%) thrombotic events and 6 (1.4%) bleeding events were recorded. Notably, patients on higher doses of LMWHs compared to patients who received standard prophylactic doses had 70% lower odds to develop thrombotic events (OR: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.10-1.0, p = 0.04). Conclusion: CAT is an important issue in oncology. Along with the Khorana score, factors as metastasis and use of HTRCAs should also be taken into consideration. Thromboprophylaxis for active cancer patients with LMWHs, even on higher doses is safe and efficient.
Barrett's esophagus (BE) is a major precursor factor of esophageal cancer (EC). The appropriate management of patients with BE depends on the presence or not of dysplasia and the type of dysplasia that occurs. Due to the small proportion of BE patients that progress to cancer, the value of surveillance programs are a matter of debate. On the contrary, in high risk group of patients surveillance programs have significant impact. Large prospective trials are needed to define the optimal management strategy. Elucidation of carcinogenesis' steps and signal transduction pathways could reveal potential biomarkers in the order of early prediction for a highly malignant neoplasm with dismal prognosis. An efficacious tailored-made manner focusing to the safety profile and associated costs should be practised for less severe disease. In this review a thorough investigation of all available methods dealing with the clinical management of BE is provided.
658 Background: Both Vinorelbine plus Gemcitabine (VG) regimen and Capecitabine (C) monotherapy are active salvage treatments in patients (pts) with advanced breast cancer (ABC). In this multicenter study we compared the efficacy and tolerability of the two regimens as salvage treatment in pts with ABC pretreated with taxane and anthracycline chemotherapy. Methods: Pts were randomized to receive either vinorelbine 25 mg/m 2 plus gemcitabine 1000 mg/m 2 (VG) both on day 1 in cycles every 2 weeks or capecitabine 1250 mg/m 2 (C) twice a day on days 1–14 in cycles every 3 weeks. The primary end point of the study was to compare the time to disease progression (TTP). Results: A total of 114 pts were randomized to VG (n=60) and C (n=54). All pts were evaluable for toxicity and 58 VG and 54 C pts for response. Seven (VG) vs 9 (C) pts had stage IIIB disease and 6 vs 5 pts had PS 2. We observed one complete response on each arm and 14(24%) vs 12(22%) partial responses for an overall response rate of 25.8% vs 24.1% (p=0.8) in VG vs C pts, respectively. The median duration of response was 5 vs 12 months (p=0.02) and the median TTP 3.7 vs 5.8 months (p=0.4) for VG and C pts, respectively. A total of 339 VG and 270 C cycles were administered with no toxic deaths. Both regimens were overall well tolerated; grade 3–4 neutropenia 17% vs 4% (p=0.02), anemia 4% vs 2% (p=0.6), grade 3 thrombocytopenia 2% vs 2%, neurotoxicity 3% vs 2%, grade 2–4 hand-foot syndrome 2% vs 15% (p=0.009) for VG and C pts, respectively. Conclusions: In this preliminary analysis the VG and C regimens showed similar activity but different although rarely severe toxicity. Updated results will be presented at the meeting. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Primary squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the ovary is rare. Most cases arise from a cystic teratoma or less frequently from Brenner tumor or endometriosis. We reviewed 36 cases of primary ovarian SCC reported in the literature including a case diagnosed and treated in our institution.Data was collected by using the key-words "primary squamous cell carcinoma" and "ovary" on Google Scholar and PubMed in April 2018. All reviewed cases were analyzed according to diagnosis, surgical approach, adjuvant therapy and outcome.To date 23 articles presenting 36 cases of primary ovarian SCC are reported. Nine patients had stage I, 8 stage II, 11 stage III and 5 stage IV disease, whereas 3 patients had in situ carcinoma. All patients underwent surgery (mainly hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy). Adjuvant therapy was reported in 24 patients, 15 of which received chemotherapy, 6 radiotherapy and 3 a combination of both. Chemotherapy regimens were similar to the ones used in ovarian carcinoma (more often platinum plus paclitaxel). Follow-up period was in general short and survival varied between 9 days and 14 years, depending on the stage at diagnosis.Primary ovarian SCC is a rare entity with poor prognosis, compared to serous carcinoma. Treatment is usually extrapolated from classical ovarian carcinoma algorithms, including surgical management combined with adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy. Further investigations are needed to define optimal treatment, such as chemotherapy regimens and the role of radiotherapy and lymph node dissection.
Introduction: The combination of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel for first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer has shown better results in response and survival over gemcitabine monotherapy. The standard administration on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 4-week cycle has some practical disadvantages. We present the updated results of an observational study for which we adopted a biweekly regimen with the same dose density. Methods: Between 30 May 2014 and 02 March 2018, 56 patients with ECOG/PS 0-2 diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic, histologically or cytologically confirmed pancreatic cancer and no prior treatment, were enrolled in the study. The regimen included 1.5 g/m2 gemcitabine and 175 mg/m2 nab-paclitaxel given every two weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. All patients were informed and signed a consent form. Study endpoints were PFS, OS and toxicity profile. The survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method. Results: 56 patients received this treatment. After a median follow-up period of 7.1 months, the median PFS and OS were 5.3 and 10 months respectively. There was no toxic death during the study and the adverse events noted were similar to those of the original regime. Conclusion: Biweekly combination of gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel seems to be as safe and efficient as the original regimen. It reduced the patients' discomfort as well as the cost of the treatment.
