Abstract Three experiments were conducted with a volunteer to test the kinetics of the 222Rn exhalation after a shorttime exposure to an elevated 222Rn air concentration. Radon concentration in an exhaled air was measured, complemented by whole body counting of 222Rn decay products in a body. Exhaled activities are compared with the prediction of the recent ICRP biokinetic model for radon. While a rapid equilibration of the exhaled radon activity concentration with that in the air inhaled corresponded with the model, the measured 222Rn exhalation rate was significantly less than modelled. Five hours after termination of the inhalation phase, the radon concentration in the exhaled air decreased to levels expected for non-elevated indoor radon activity concentration. Whole body activities of the 222Rn decay products were found higher than expected. Inhalation of the unattached fraction or residual activity of decay products in the air inhaled may be the explanation.
Doses from intakes of radionuclides cannot be measured but must be assessed from monitoring, such as whole body counting or urinary excretion measurements. Such assessments require application of a biokinetic model and estimation of the exposure time, material properties, etc. Because of the variety of parameters involved, the results of such assessments may vary over a wide range, according to the skill and the experience of the assessor. The need for harmonisation of assessment procedures has been recognised in a research project carried out under the EU 5 th Framework Programme. The aim of the project IDEAS (partly funded by the European Commission under contract No. FIKR-CT2001-00160) was to develop general guidelines for assessments of intakes and internal doses from individual monitoring data. The IDEAS project started in October 2001 and ended in June 2005. To ensure that the guidelines are applicable to a wide range of practical situations, a database was compiled of cases of internal contamination that include monitoring data suitable for assessment. About 50 cases from the database were analized by different assessors, the results were collated, and differences in assumptions identified, with their effects on the assessed doses. From the results, and other investigations, draft guidelines were prepared, to provide a systematic procedure for estimating the required parameter values that are not part of the measurement data. A virtual workshop was held on the Internet, open to internal dosimetry professionals, to discuss the draft guidelines, which were revised accordingly. In collaboration with the IAEA, an intercomparison exercise on internal dose assessment was then conducted, which was also open to all involved in internal dosimetry. Six cases were developed and circulated with a copy of the revised guidelines, which participants were encouraged to follow, to test their applicability and effectiveness. The results were collated and a Workshop held to discuss the results with the participants. The guidelines were refined on the basis of the experience and discussion. The guidelines are based on a general philosophy of: • Harmonisation: by following the Guidelines any two assessors should obtain the same estimate of dose from a given data set. • Accuracy: the best estimate of dose should be obtained from the available data. • Proportionality: the effort applied to the evaluation should be proportionate to the dose - the lower the dose, the simpler the process should be. Following these principles, the Guidelines use the following Levels of task to structure the approach to an evaluation: Level 0: Annual dose 6 mSv). The guidelines provide: • Background information about the biokinetic models and the corresponding bioassay functions for the interpretation of monitoring data. • Detailed information about the handling and evaluation of monitoring data. • A structured approach to dose assessment consisting of a step-by-step procedure described in well-defined flowcharts with accompanying explanatory text.
The IDEAS Guidelines for the assessment of internal doses from monitoring data suggest default measurement uncertainties (i.e. scattering factors, SFs) to be used for different types of monitoring data. However, these default values were mainly based upon expert judgement. In this paper, SF values have been calculated for different radionuclides and types of monitoring data using real data contained in the IDEAS Internal Contamination Database. Results are presented.
Previous ICRU reports have dealt with the formulation and properties of tissue substitutes and phantoms that are used to calibrate in vivo measurement systems. This report provides guidance on the overall process of the direct measurement of radionuclides in the human body for radiation protection and medical applications. It addresses the detectors and electronics used for the measurement; methods of background reduction and control; measurement geometries for whole body, partial body or organ counting; physical and mathematical calibration methods; data analysis; and quality assurance. It is directed to readers who need practical advice on the establishment and operation of direct measurement facilities.
'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(23.036 .093 25.536)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(45.87 1.273 16.18)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(69.945 .996 12.078)'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(20.66 -19.689 31.932)'/%3e%3c/svg%3e)
'%3e%3cpath fill='%23012169' d='M0 0v30h60V0z'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='6' d='m0 0 60 30m0-30L0 30'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23C8102E' stroke-width='4' d='m0 0 60 30m0-30L0 30' clip-path='url(%23b)'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='10' d='M30 0v30M0 15h60'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23C8102E' stroke-width='6' d='M30 0v30M0 15h60'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e)
