Abstract The expanded new edition of this successful Workbook provides the reader with practical information and skills to help them understand and change a drug or alcohol problem. Designed to be used in conjunction with counselling or therapy, it focuses on special issues involved in stopping substance abuse and in changing behaviours or aspects of one's lifestyle that keep the substance use problem active. The information presented is derived from a wealth of research studies, and discusses the most effective recovery strategies from the examination of cognitive-behavioural treatment, coping skills training, and relapse prevention. In addition to addressing substance use problems, the recovery process, the relapse process, types of professional treatments available, and self-help groups, this expanded edition also includes a new chapter on the management of a co-occurring psychiatric disorder.
R. Lorraine Collins State University of New York at Stony Brook George A. Parks and G. Alan Marlatt University of Washington Two studies were conducted to assess variables related to the social determinants of alcohol consumption. In Study 1, moderate- and heavy-drinking male under- graduates were paired with confederates who behaved in a sociable or unsociable manner while modeling either light or heavy consumption. Modeling occurred in the sociable conditions but not in the unsociable conditions, where subjects tended to drink heavily. In Study 2, a similar group of subjects was exposed to one of three social status conditions crossed with light versus heavy consumption. The results indicated a modeling effect in all social status conditions. These studies provide further support for the existence of a modeling effect that can be disrupted by a lack of rapport between drinking partners. This latter finding has implications for the etiology of problem drinking because it suggests that increased alcohol consumption may serve as a strategy for coping with aversive social interactions. Initial research on the effect of modeled consumption rates on social drinking (Caudill & Marlatt, 1975) suggested that heavy-drink- ing men tended to match the consumption of their drinking partner whether his con- sumption was heavy or light. Subsequent examinations of this phenomenon replicated these findings in laboratory analogue drinking tasks such as the taste-rating task (Cooper, Waterhouse, & Sobell, 1979; Hendricks, So- bell, & Cooper, 1978; Lied & Marlatt, 1979; Watson & Sobell, 1982), natural bar settings (Reid, 1978), and seminaturalistic bar settings (Caudill & Lipscomb, 1980). Much of the research concerning the mod- eling of alcohol consumption has focused on manipulating characteristics of the model, including the nature of the social interaction between the model and the subject. The effects of manipulating social interaction are unclear. In the Caudill and Marlatt study, model's drinking rate (light vs. heavy) and a
This study investigated the clinical significance of previously reported statistically significant mean reductions in drinking and related problems among college students in a randomized trial of a brief indicated preventive intervention (G. A. Marlatt et al., 1998). Data were analyzed over a 2-year follow-up for participants from a high-risk intervention group (n = 153), a high-risk control group (n = 160), and a functional comparison group (n = 77). A risk cutpoint for each dependent measure was based on the functional comparison group distribution. Compared with the high-risk controls, more individuals in the high-risk intervention group improved and fewer worsened, especially on alcohol-related problems and, to a lesser extent, on drinking pattern variables. These data from a prevention context clarify the magnitude and direction of individual change obscured by group means.