Introduction: The impact of discharge heart rate on the prognosis of heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) had been described. On the other hand, the association of d...
Introduction: We previously reported that the ratio of pulmonary artery (PA) to ascending aorta (Ao) diameter measured by CT (PA/Ao) was well correlated with directly measured pulmonary artery pres...
Cirrhosis is a significant adverse factor of cardiac surgeries. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has evolved as a less invasive therapy for aortic stenosis, whereas detailed case analysis of TAVI in cirrhotic patients is limited.Among 444 consecutive patients who underwent TAVI in the Sakakibara Heart Institute between October 2013 and January 2018, we retrospectively reviewed 11 patients (2.5%) with cirrhosis. All outcomes were defined according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 criteria.The median age of the patients was 82 years, and eight (73%) were female. Seven patients (64%) were Child-Turcotte-Pugh class A, and four patients (36%) were class B. The Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score was 10 (7.0-13). TAVI was performed using Edwards SAPIEN XT/SAPIEN3 in nine patients (82%), and Medtronic CoreValve/Evolut R in two patients (18%), via transfemoral (n = 8, 73%) or transapical (n = 3, 27%) approach. The device success rate was 100% and no extracorporeal circulation had been inducted. No death, stroke, life-threatening bleeding, and acute kidney injury stage 2 or 3 occurred within 30 days, but three major bleeding events (27%) were documented (two access-site bleeding in transapical approach, and one pulmonary hemorrhage caused by transient mitral regurgitation). During a median follow-up of 493 days, four deaths had occurred, and the mid-term survival rate was 81% and 65% at one and two years each.TAVI is a promising therapeutic option for patients with cirrhosis. Further study should be needed regarding optimal patient selection and procedures in patients with cirrhosis.
Postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) stay after cardiac surgeries has been extensively studied, but little attention has been given to ICU stay following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). This study examined ICU stay after TAVR.Two hundred and forty-five patients who underwent TAVR between April 2010 and October 2016 were studied retrospectively. We investigated the status of ICU stay, the predictors of prolonged ICU stay (PICUS), and its impact on short- and long-term outcomes. Prolonged ICU stay was defined as post-TAVR ICU stay longer than 2 days (day of TAVR + 1 day).Length of ICU stay was 2.6 ± 4.9 days, and PICUS was identified in 14.7% of the patients. The predominant reason for PICUS was congestive heart failure or circulatory failure (41.7%). Pulmonary dysfunction and nontransfemoral approach were independent predictors of PICUS (pulmonary dysfunction: odds ratio = 2.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-7.35; nontransfemoral approach: odds ratio = 2.81, 95% CI: 1.15-6.89). Prolonged ICU stay was associated with higher rate of 30-day combined end point (PICUS vs non-PICUS: 44.4% vs 3.3%, P < .0001), longer postoperative hospital stay (49.9 ± 141.9 days vs 12.0 ± 6.0 days, P < .0001), and lower rate of discharge home (77.8% vs 95.2%, P = .0002). Patients with PICUS had worse long-term survival (P < .0001), and PICUS was a predictor of mortality (hazard ratio: 4.21, 95% CI: 2.09-8.22).Prolonged ICU stay following TAVR was found in 14.7%, and pulmonary dysfunction and nontransfemoral approach were associated with PICUS. Short- and long-term prognoses were worse in patients with PICUS than those without.
Abstract Background Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) sometimes deteriorate late after left-sided valve surgery. The recent guidelines recommend tricuspid valve repair at the same time as the left-sided valve surgery. However, little is known about the pathophysiology that leads to severe TR after left-sided valve surgery. Purpose To clarify the risk factors of the patients with severe TR after left-sided valve surgery. Methods We retrospectively investigated consecutive 526 patients diagnosed as severe TR from January 2004 to December 2018 at our hospital. Clinical background, echocardiographic parameters were evaluated. Demographic information and clinical data (including age, electrocardiograms, type of left-sided valve surgery, underlying valve diseases and history of pacemaker or ICD implantation) were obtained by chart review. Results Of the 526 patients with severe TR, 107 patients were after a left-sided valve surgery. Patients developed severe TR at a mean of 14.8 ± 8 years after surgery.The surgical indications were as follows: mitral valve stenosis (74 patients, 69%), mitral valve regurgitation (43 patients, 40%), aortic valve stenosis (37 patients, 35%) and aortic regurgitation (28 patients, 26%), respectively. The mean age at diagnosis of severe TR was 74 ± 10 years and 75 were female (70%). Among those patients, 32 patients (30%) had a tricuspid annuloplasty (TAP) with the first left-sided valve surgery. Ninety-five patients (88%) had atrial fibrillation (AF), 75 patients (70%) were diagnosed as rheumatic heart disease, 64 patients (60%) had pulmonary artery hypertension (PH) and 28 patients (26%) had a permanent pacemaker or ICD implantation. There were only 12 patients who had severe TR without AF. Eight of 12 patients without AF had PH, and permanent pacemakers were implanted in remaining 4 patients. Conclusions Almost all patients with severe TR after left-sided valve surgery present with AF and prevalence of rheumatic heart disease were about 70 percent. These two factors may be one of the important risk factors for severe TR after left-sided valve surgery.