Abstract Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of different endoscopic surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Design Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Data sources A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception to 31 March 2019. Study selection Randomised controlled trials comparing vapourisation, resection, and enucleation of the prostate using monopolar, bipolar, or various laser systems (holmium, thulium, potassium titanyl phosphate, or diode) as surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The primary outcomes were the maximal flow rate (Qmax) and international prostate symptoms score (IPSS) at 12 months after surgical treatment. Secondary outcomes were Qmax and IPSS values at 6, 24, and 36 months after surgical treatment; perioperative parameters; and surgical complications. Data extraction and synthesis Two independent reviewers extracted the study data and performed quality assessments using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The effect sizes were summarised using weighted mean differences for continuous outcomes and odds ratios for binary outcomes. Frequentist approach to the network meta-analysis was used to estimate comparative effects and safety. Ranking probabilities of each treatment were also calculated. Results 109 trials with a total of 13 676 participants were identified. Nine surgical treatments were evaluated. Enucleation achieved better Qmax and IPSS values than resection and vapourisation methods at six and 12 months after surgical treatment, and the difference maintained up to 24 and 36 months after surgical treatment. For Qmax at 12 months after surgical treatment, the best three methods compared with monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) were bipolar enucleation (mean difference 2.42 mL/s (95% confidence interval 1.11 to 3.73)), diode laser enucleation (1.86 (−0.17 to 3.88)), and holmium laser enucleation (1.07 (0.07 to 2.08)). The worst performing method was diode laser vapourisation (−1.90 (−5.07 to 1.27)). The results of IPSS at 12 months after treatment were similar to Qmax at 12 months after treatment. The best three methods, versus monopolar TURP, were diode laser enucleation (mean difference −1.00 (−2.41 to 0.40)), bipolar enucleation (0.87 (−1.80 to 0.07)), and holmium laser enucleation (−0.84 (−1.51 to 0.58)). The worst performing method was diode laser vapourisation (1.30 (−1.16 to 3.76)). Eight new methods were better at controlling bleeding than monopolar TURP, resulting in a shorter catheterisation duration, reduced postoperative haemoglobin declination, fewer clot retention events, and lower blood transfusion rate. However, short term transient urinary incontinence might still be a concern for enucleation methods, compared with resection methods (odds ratio 1.92, 1.39 to 2.65). No substantial inconsistency between direct and indirect evidence was detected in primary or secondary outcomes. Conclusion Eight new endoscopic surgical methods for benign prostatic hyperplasia appeared to be superior in safety compared with monopolar TURP. Among these new treatments, enucleation methods showed better Qmax and IPSS values than vapourisation and resection methods. Study registration CRD42018099583.
Abstract Background Dynamic duplex sonography (DUS) is not comprehensive in the evaluation of arteriogenic erectile dysfunction (ED). We introduced a new parameter, the flow index (FI), into the assessment of arteriogenic ED. Methods A retrospective review of a prospective database was conducted. Patients undergoing DUS and pelvic computed tomography angiography (CTA) for the evaluation of ED were included. The FI was calculated from peak systolic velocity (PSV) and the percentages of pelvic arterial (PLA) stenosis. Correlations between PSV, PLA stenosis, the FI, and erectile function were calculated. Results Eighty-three patients were included. Compared with PSV, the FI had better correlations with the erection hardness score (rs=0.405, P< 0.001 for FI; rs= 0.294, P= 0.007 for PSV) and a better area under the curve for arteriogenic ED (AUC= 0.759 for FI; AUC= 0.700 for PSV). In patients with normal DUS but ED, PLA stenosis was more severe (62.5% vs. 10.0%, P= 0.015), and the FI was lower (8.35 vs. 57.78, P= 0.006), while PSV was not different. Conclusion The FI is better than PSV in the evaluation of arteriogenic ED. On the other hand, assessment of the pelvic arterial system should be included in the evaluation of ED.
Background: The addition of androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) or pelvic radiation to prostate bed salvage radiotherapy (SRT) has been debated for prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) after radical prostatectomy. This study aimed to assess the outcomes and propose prediction models for exclusive prostate bed SRT. Methods: This is a prospective observational cohort study with patients who underwent SRT with a pre-SRT PSA < 1.5 ng/mL after radical prostatectomy. Patients were treated with 70-Gy SRT to the prostate bed exclusively. Kaplan–Meier survival analyses and Cox regression analyses were applied for depicting and predicting BCR-free survival, ADT-free survival, and metastasis-free survival (MFS). Regression-based coefficients were used to develop nomograms. Results: A total of 105 patients were included and 91 patients were eligible. The median follow-up period was 39 months. The 5-year BCR-free survival, ADT-free survival, and MFS were 37%, 50%, and 66%, respectively. Multivariable analysis showed that a pre-SRT PSA < 0.45 ng/mL was the only independent factor associated with longer BCR-free survival (p = 0.034), while a PSA-DT > 8 months had better ADT-free survival (p = 0.008). Patients with a PSA-DT > 8 months showed a 100% MFS and a 43% 5-year absolute benefit in MFS than a PSA-DT ≤ 8 months. All patients with a pre-SRT PSA < 0.45 ng/mL and PSA-DT > 8 months were free from subsequent ADT and any metastasis. Conclusions: In patients with a PSA < 0.45 ng/mL and PSA-DT > 8 months for post-prostatectomy BCR, prostate bed SRT provided excellent outcomes without the need for concomitant ADT or pelvic radiotherapy.
To investigate the survival outcomes of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients receiving first-line novel androgen receptor axis-targeted therapies (ARATs) and prognostic factors for patient survival.This retrospective study obtained data from 202 patients who started abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide as first-line therapy for mCRPC between 2016 and 2021 from a single academic center. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) defined as the interval from the start of ARAT to death, loss to follow-up, or the end of the study period. The secondary endpoints were PSA decline, PSA nadir, and time to nadir (TTN) after ARATs. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were applied for depicting OS. Cox proportional hazards model with inversed probability of treatment weighing-adjustment was used to validate the effect of patient, disease, and treatment response factors on OS.Among 202 patients, 164 patients were treated with first-line ARATs alone and 38 patients received second-line chemotherapy. The median OS was not reached in patients with first-line ARATs alone and was 38.8 months in those with subsequent chemotherapy after failure from ARATs. OS was not different between the use of abiraterone and enzalutamide, though enzalutamide showed a higher rate of PSA decline ≧ 90% (56% versus 40%, p = 0.021) and longer TTN (5.5 versus 4.7 months, p = 0.019). Multivariable analysis showed that PSA nadir > 2 ng/mL [hazard ratio (HR) 7.04, p < 0.001] and TTN<7 months (HR 2.18, p = 0.012) were independently associated with shorter OS. Patients with both of these poor prognostic factors had worse OS compared to those who had 0-1 factors (HR 9.21, p < 0.001).Patients with mCRPC who received first-line ARATs had better survival if they had a PSA nadir[Formula: see text]2 ng/mL or a TTN[Formula: see text]7 months. Further study is needed to determine if an early switch in therapy for those in whom neither is achieved may impact OS.
'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' transform='rotate(60)'/%3e%3ccircle r='17' fill='%23000095'/%3e%3ccircle r='15' fill='%23fff'/%3e%3c/svg%3e)
