Abstract Introduction Moderate or severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) is regarded as high or very high risk factor in the Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) system, as stated in the ESC guidelines on arterial hypertension. Assessment of cardiovascular (CV) risk should be completed evaluating hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD). Purpose The aim of our study was to find out differences in HMOD in patients with or without moderate to severe chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods We enrolled 80 consecutive non-diabetic hypertensive patients, divided into two groups according to the presence of impaired renal function, evaluated by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR): moderate to severe CKD group (n=26 patients, eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2) and mild CKD - normal renal function group (n=54 patients, eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2). A transthoracic echocardiogram was performed to evaluate cardiac HMOD. Small and large vessel damage was assessed by means of non-mydriatic digital fundus oculi examination in order to detect arteriolar narrowing using arteriolar-venular ratio (AVr), applanation tonometry to measure carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) and carotid ultrasound to quantify intima-media tickness (IMT). Results Moderate to severe CKD patients appeared to be older (mean age 75.54±8.06 vs 63.38±9.62, p=0.001) and showed lower level of total and LDL cholesterol. Both groups showed abnormal values of cfPWV, but these were significantly higher in the presence of moderate to severe CKD (14.12±7.93 m/s vs 10.94±5.81 m/s, p=0.03). Abnormal AVr values were found in patients with higher grade of CKD, with statistically significant differences in the two groups (0.75±0.015 vs 0.81±0.06, p=0.00001). Carotid IMT resulted to be at the upper limit of normality in both groups (0.95±0.15 vs 0.90±0.18, p=0.35). With regard to echocardiography evaluation, left ventricular mass index (LVMi: 105.04±0.4 vs 96.35±1.7, p=0.06) and relative wall thickness (RWT: 0.43±0.02 vs 0.42±0.05, p=0.41) did not differ significantly in the two groups, with a mild trend for LVMi. Both groups showed abnormal diastolic dysfunction on average, but no differences emerged in the presence of more severe renal impairment (deceleration time 281.74±0.37 vs 256.30±0.54, p=0.08; E/A 0.86±0.03 vs 0.95±0.25, p=0.20; E/e' 7.89±2.93 vs 7.60±2.46, p=0.66). Conclusions Our study showed significant differences in HMOD in presence of moderate to severe renal impairment. Moderate to severe CKD seemed to be associated to vascular damage (hypertensive retinopathy and arterial stiffness), while no significant differences in echocardiographic markers of cardiac remodeling were found, suggesting that systemic vascular damage is more closely linked to CKD than cardiac damage. Therefore, the use of fundus oculi examination and PWV should always be considered to properly assess the target organ damage in hypertensive patients with CKD. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None
The aim of the study was to describe ECG modifications and arrhythmic events in COVID-19 patients undergoing hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) therapy in different clinical settings.COVID-19 patients at seven institutions receiving HCQ therapy from whom a baseline and at least one ECG at 48+ h were available were enrolled in the study. QT/QTc prolongation, QT-associated and QT-independent arrhythmic events, arrhythmic mortality, and overall mortality during HCQ therapy were assessed. A total of 649 COVID-19 patients (61.9 ± 18.7 years, 46.1% males) were enrolled. HCQ therapy was administrated as a home therapy regimen in 126 (19.4%) patients, and as an in-hospital-treatment to 495 (76.3%) hospitalized and 28 (4.3%) intensive care unit (ICU) patients. At 36-72 and at 96+ h after the first HCQ dose, 358 and 404 ECGs were obtained, respectively. A significant QT/QTc interval prolongation was observed (P < 0.001), but the magnitude of the increase was modest [+13 (9-16) ms]. Baseline QT/QTc length and presence of fever (P = 0.001) at admission represented the most important determinants of QT/QTc prolongation. No arrhythmic-related deaths were reported. The overall major ventricular arrhythmia rate was low (1.1%), with all events found not to be related to QT or HCQ therapy at a centralized event evaluation. No differences in QT/QTc prolongation and QT-related arrhythmias were observed across different clinical settings, with non-QT-related arrhythmias being more common in the intensive care setting.HCQ administration is safe for a short-term treatment for patients with COVID-19 infection regardless of the clinical setting of delivery, causing only modest QTc prolongation and no directly attributable arrhythmic deaths.
Abstract Background the electrophysiological substrate underpinning ventricular tachycardia (VT) in cardiac amyloidosis (CA) remains elusive, and outcomes of catheter ablation in this peculiar population are currently unknown. Purpose we sought to describe the electrophysiological substrate and clinical outcomes of VT ablation in a cohort of patients with CA. Methods we included 19 consecutive patients (mean age, 69±10 years; male sex, 89%) with CA (ATTR, n=13; AL, n=6) undergoing catheter ablation for VT/ventricular fibrillation (VF) between 2013 and 2023 in a retrospective, observational, international study, involving 7 referral European and North American electrophysiology units. The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent VT/VF during follow-up, while the primary safety outcome included major procedure-related adverse events. Results the indication for ablation was drug-refractory VT in 16 patients (84%), and PVC-initiated polymorphic VT/VF in 3 (16%). Catheter ablation was performed using endocardial (n=14, 74%) or endo-epicardial approaches (n=5, 26%). Complete endocardial electroanatomical voltage maps of the left and right ventricles were obtained in 14 (74%) and 6 (32%) patients, respectively. Each patient had evidence of low-voltage areas, most commonly involving the interventricular septum (n=12); late potentials were recorded in 13 patients (68%). A median of 1 (1-2) VTs were inducible per patient; in 10 subjects (43% of mappable VTs), activation mapping was consistent with septal VT origin. Complete procedural success was obtained in 13 patients (68%), at the expense of 4 (21%) major procedure-related adverse events. After a median follow-up of 36 (18-54) months, sustained VT/VF recurrence was observed in 9 patients (47%); survival free from VT/VF recurrence was 74% (95%CI, 56-96%) at 12 months, and 53% (95%CI, 34-94%) at 36-month follow-up; the majority of patients remained on antiarrhythmic drugs (Figure). Low-voltage QRS (HR,21.96; p=0.022) and complete procedural success (HR,0.08; p=0.029) were associated with recurrent VT/VF at multivariable analysis (Figure). Conclusions catheter ablation of VT/VF is associated with favorable acute and mid-term arrhythmia control, yet with substantial risk of procedure-related complications and long-term recurrences. Septal substrate and frailty challenge successful management of patients with CA and VT/VF.Multimodality evaluation of LV substrateMain Study Outcomes
Abstract Purpose Electrical artefacts are frequent in implantable cardiac monitors (ICMs). We analyzed the subcutaneous electrogram (sECG) provided by an ICM with a long sensing vector and factors potentially affecting its quality. Methods Consecutive ICM recipients underwent a follow‐up where demographics, body mass index (BMI), implant location, and surface ECG were collected. The sECG was then analyzed in terms of R‐wave amplitude and P‐wave visibility. Results A total of 84 patients (43% female, median age 68 [58‐76] years) were enrolled at 3 sites. ICMs were positioned with intermediate inclination (n = 44, 52%), parallel (n = 35, 43%), or perpendicular (n = 5, 6%) to the sternum. The median R‐wave amplitude was 1.10 (0.72‐1.48) mV with P waves readily visible in 69.2% (95% confidence interval, CI: 57.8%‐79.2%), partially visible in 23.1% [95% CI: 14.3%‐34.0%], and never visible in 7.7% [95% CI: 2.9%‐16.0%] of patients. Men had higher R‐wave amplitudes compared to women (1.40 [0.96‐1.80] mV vs 1.00 [0.60‐1.20] mV, P = .001), while obese people tended to have lower values (0.80 [0.62‐1.28] mV vs 1.10 [0.90‐1.50] mV, P = .074). The P‐wave visibility reached 86.2% [95% CI: 68.3%‐96.1%] in patients with high‐voltage P waves (≥0.2 mV) at surface ECG. The sECG quality was not affected by implant site. Conclusion In ordinary clinical practice, ICMs with long sensing vector provided median R‐wave amplitude above 1 mV and reliable P‐wave visibility of nearly 70%, regardless of the position of the device. Women and obese patients showed lower but still very good signal quality.
Abstract Background Data on patients with heart failure (HF) with a subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S–ICD) are scarce. Objective Aim of this study was to assess clinical outcomes of the S–ICD in HF patients in a real–world analysis from the largest European retrospective S–ICD registry (ELISIR). Methods All consecutive patients undergoing S–ICD implantation at several European institutions were used for the current analysis. The population was classified into two groups: the HF (classified as HF with reduced and mid–range ejection fraction – HFrEF and HFmrEF) vs the no–HF cohort. The primary outcome of the study was the inappropriate shock (IS) rate across the two cohorts. As secondary outcomes, appropriate shocks, cardiovascular mortality and device–related complications during follow–up were assessed Results A total of 1409 patients from the ELISIR registry were included; HF patients represented 57.3% of the entire cohort (n = 701, 86.9% HFrEF; n = 106,13.1% HFmrEF). Over a median follow–up of approximately 2 years, a total of 133 inappropriate shocks were observed in the entire cohort, without significant differences among the two groups (9.2% vs 9.8%, p = 0.689). 133 complex ventricular arrhythmias were adequately recognized and treated, with similar rates of appropriate shocks (9.2% vs 9.8%, p = 0.689). Inappropriate and effective shocks–free survival has been represented in Figure 1 (Kaplan–Meier estimates). At multivariate analysis (Figure 2), age (HR = 0.974 [0.955–0.992], p = 0.005), LVEF (HR = 0.954 [0.926–0.984], p = 0.003), arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy – ARVC (HR = 3.364 [1.206–9.384], p = 0.020) and smart pass + (HR = 0.321 [0.184–0.560], p < 0.001) remained associated with inappropriate shocks. Moreover, a low number of patients (n = 76) experienced device–related complications, more frequently in the HF cohort (6.2% vs 3.8%, p = 0.031) with no significant differences regarding any specific outcome of interest: lead infection (1.1% vs 0.7%, p = 0.381), pocket infection (1.9% vs 0.8%, p = 0.107), pocket hematoma (3.2% vs 2.8%, p = 0.668). Conclusion The use of S–ICD in HF patients did not result in a higher rate of inappropriate shocks when compared to no–HF patients, even when stratifying for LVEF. Only age, LVEF, ARVC e Smart Pass algorithm were predictors of the primary outcome at multivariate analysis. Despite a lower overall rate of complications in the entire cohort, HF patients experienced device–related complications more frequently.
Abstract Background One of the current limitations of the S–ICD is the relatively large size of the generator compared to the TV (transvenous) ICD. There is little evidence whether the size of the current S–ICD generator is associated with an elevated risk of device–related complications in patients with a low body mass index (BMI). Purpose Aim of this study was to compare the device–related complications and long–term outcomes in a large real world cohort of S–ICD recipients in patients with a BMI <18 kg/m2 compared to patients with a BMI >18 kg/m2. Methods All consecutive patients meeting current guideline indications for ICD implantation and undergoing implantation of a S–ICD device (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, Massachusetts, USA) at 21 European institutions enrolled in the extended ELISIR registry were used for the current analysis. Patients were classified into two cohorts, depending on the BMI at the time of device implantations: BMI < 18 kg/m2 versus > 18 kg/m2. Results Out of a total of 1497 pts, 58 pts (3.9%) had a BMI < 18 kg/m2. Patients with BMI <18 kg/m2 were younger (44.6±2.4 vs 50.8±0.4; p = 0.004) and more frequently female (58.6% vs 22.3%, p < 0.001). No differences in any of the other baseline characteristic were observed. Implantation techniques resulted comparable between the groups (rates of 2–incision technique: 87.8% vs 91.9%; p = 0.256; inter–muscular placement: 89.7% vs 83.3%; p = 0.198). Of note, the mean PRAETORIAN score at implantation of patients with BMI <18 kg/m2 was significantly lower (33.8±9.1 vs 54.1±47.3; p = 0.035), although the vast majority of patients in both cohorts qualified as at low risk of conversion failure (100% vs 91.4%; p = 0.436). Over a median follow up time of 22.4 [11.6–36.8] months, both overall device–related complications (5.2% vs 7.4%) and rates of inappropriate shocks (12.0% vs 8.8%) resulted comparable between the two groups (p = 0.517 and p = 0.385, respectively). Figure 1 reports Kaplan–Meier curves showing the combined incidence of device–related complications and inappropriate shocks in the two groups (log–rank p = 0.576). Conclusion No differences in device–related complications and long–term outcomes after S–ICD implantation were observed in patients with BMI <18 kg/m2 compared to the remaining recipients in a large multicentered real–world analysis.
Abstract Aims During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in-person visits were reduced to prevent potential risk of exposure. Virtual visits (VVs) represent an innovative model to take care of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and feasibility of VV in the management of CIED patients. Methods and results We performed a prospective study including all CIED patients who received a VV from July 2020 to July 2021. Blood pressure, arterial oxygen saturation, heart rate, and body weight were registered by the patient. Moreover, we sent to the patient a questionnaire to evaluate the patients’ satisfaction about VV. We enrolled 182 patients in the study period. The mean age of patients was 70.2 ± 13.5 years-old and the majority (61.1%) was male. In two cases, VVs were not performed due to technical issues. Overall, 70.9% of patients utilized a smartphone, while 20.1% and 9% used, respectively, a tablet or a personal computer. The mean duration of VV was 27.8 ± 7.8 min. Patients helped by a caregiver were 64 (35.2%). One urgent/emergent in-person visit was performed in a patient with acute heart failure. Overall, VV was preferred to in-person evaluation. Conclusion VV is a safe and feasible approach to follow-up CIED patients. A high degree of patient satisfaction was reached after VV. The use of VV has promising potential and should be implemented beyond COVID-19 period and integrated in the healthcare system as a new model of care.
'%3e%3cpath fill='%23012169' d='M0 0v30h60V0z'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='6' d='m0 0 60 30m0-30L0 30'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23C8102E' stroke-width='4' d='m0 0 60 30m0-30L0 30' clip-path='url(%23b)'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='10' d='M30 0v30M0 15h60'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23C8102E' stroke-width='6' d='M30 0v30M0 15h60'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e)