Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) is a commonly used method in bariatric surgery that leads to sufficient long-term weight loss and consequently to improvement or resolution of obesity-associated diseases. The nadir weight is commonly reached between six months and two years after surgery. Despite this initially good weight loss, weight regain is observed in up to 20% of the patients. Besides intensive dietological evaluation, bariatric re-operation can be an option in these cases. Before the surgical reintervention, an intensive evaluation of the esophagus, pouch, anastomosis, and adjacent small bowel using upper GI-endoscopy and radiological examinations (X-ray and/or 3D-CT volumetry) is mandatory. In patients with a dilated pouch, pouch-resizing with a MiniMIZER® Gastric Ring (Bariatric Solutions GmbH, Stein am Rhein, Switzerland) could be an option to reestablish restriction in the long term. Currently, there is no gold standard for the choice of the weight regain procedure or for the technique used in the procedure itself. This article focuses on the standardized procedure of pouch resizing with implantation of a MiniMIZER® Gastric Ring for the surgical therapy of weight regain due to pouch dilatation and/or dilatation of the gastrojejunostomy and the adjacent small bowel (usually approximately the first 20cm), resulting in a huge neo-stomach after RYGB, as performed at the Medical University of Vienna. Further, indications for revisional surgery for weight regain, mandatory examinations, and recommended conservative therapy options prior to surgery will be described. Next, the fast-track concept and its advantages are explained. Lastly, the surgical procedure, including positioning of the patient, placement of trocars, the intraoperative process, and special advice, is presented. Exact planning of the procedure and postoperative follow-up are indispensable for a further long-term success after weight regain surgery. In conclusion, pouch-resizing and implantation of the MiniMIZER® Gastric Ring represent a practical and effective solution in patients with dilated pouch/anastomosis/adjacent small bowel with weight regain after RYGB, if conservative therapy, including dietitian counseling and new drugs (e.g., Semaglutide), has failed.
To enable detailed analyses of cell interactions in tumour development, new epithelial and mesenchymal cell lines were established from human hepatocellular carcinoma by spontaneous outgrowth in culture. We obtained several hepatocarcinoma (HCC)-, B-lymphoblastoid (BLC)-, and myofibroblastoid (MF)-lines from seven cases. In-depth characterisation included cell kinetics, genotype, tumourigenicity, expression of cell-type specific markers, and proteome patterns. Many functions of the cells of origin were found to be preserved. We studied the impact of the mesenchymal lines on hepatocarcinogenesis by in vitro assays. BLC- and MF-supernatants strongly increased the DNA replication of premalignant hepatocytes. The stimulation by MF-lines was mainly attributed to HGF secretion. In HCC-cells, MF-supernatant had only minor effects on cell growth but enhanced migration. MF-lines also stimulated neoangiogenesis through vEGF release. BLC-supernatant dramatically induced death of HCC-cells, which could be largely abrogated by preincubating the supernatant with TNFβ-antiserum. Thus, the new cell lines reveal stage-specific stimulatory and inhibitory interactions between mesenchymal and epithelial tumour cells. In conclusion, the new cell lines provide unique tools to analyse essential components of the complex interplay between the microenvironment and the developing liver cancer, and to identify factors affecting proliferation, migration and death of tumour cells, neoangiogenesis, and outgrowth of additional malignancy.
Bariatric-metabolic surgery in superobese patients (BMI > 50 kg/m2) is very challenging indeed with little room for error. In many cases, a two-step procedure is required, since more complex primary bariatric procedures can be technically demanding and bearing a relevant risk for the patient. At our institution, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the preferred primary procedure, followed by a conversion to either SADI-S or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) after initial weight loss is achieved [1, 2]. This video aims at demonstrating the conversion from primary SG to RYGB due to an adverse event in a 45-year-old superobese female patient (weight, 170 kg; BMI, 73 kg/m2). An intraoperative laparoscopic video has been anonymized and edited to demonstrate the course of the operation on the patient mentioned above. The start of the procedure was uneventful. After a successful mobilization of the greater curvature, the stomach was resected with an electronic stapling device guided by a firm 36-french bougie (Rüsch, Germany) towards the angle of His. Due to a limited view, a stapler was placed over the bougie, which resulted in the stomach being subtotally transected, the staples attaching the bougie to the sleeve about 5 cm from the gastroesophageal junction. Salvage surgery after removing the remnants of the bougie was a conversion to RYGB. When performing a bariatric-metabolic surgery in superobese patients, an extended skill level is required to provide a solution, should anything go wrong. Therefore, we suggest bariatric-metabolic surgery in superobese patients to be performed solely and specifically at high-volume centres.
4535 Background: Randomized trials could not yet prove clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal cancer. A survival benefit could be shown for treatment responders only. Using platinum based regimen, yet about 20 % of patients can achieve pathological complete remission which translates in reported 3-year survival rates of 64% in this group. Factors identifying this subgroup of responders and selecting optimal drugs for non responders could dramatically enhance treatment efficacy. Several studies suggest that mutations in the p53 gene may induce drug resistance especially for agents whose effect is based on apoptosis induction, like Cisplatin. Methods: In order to test the hypothesis that the p53 genotype is predictive for chemotherapy response, a prospective study was conducted. Thirty-eight patients with potentially respectable esophageal cancer were evaluated for the relation between p53 genotype and response to two different neoadjuvant treatments. P53 gene mutations were assessed by complete direct sequencing of DNA extracted from diagnostic biopsies. Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy was assessed pathohistologically in the surgical specimen. Results: 20 squamous cell carcinoma and 18 adenocarcinoma were included. Overall the p53 mutation rate was 58% (22/38), with 66 % for squamous cell and 53% for adenocarcinomas, respectively. 30 patients received CIS/5FU (cisplatin 80mg/m 2 d1 5-FU 1,000mg/m 2 d 1–5, q21,2 cycles), 8 received docetaxel (75mg/m 2 , q21,2 cycles). The overall response rate was 48% (18/38). Patients with p53 mutation did not respond to CIS/5-FU (0/16), while all mutant patients responded to docetaxel (6/6). The overall response to p53 adapted neoadjuvant therapy was 94%. P53 adapted treatment was associated with a significant survival advantage (p=0,042) after a median follow up of 15,4 months. Conclusions: A prospective randomized trial was initiated to test the interaction between the predictive marker p53 and response to CIS/5-FU and Docetaxel, respectively. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.
