Introduction: Inhalation profiles to support use of DPIs for drug delivery in PAH subjects have not been reported. Objective: Evaluate the inspiratory flow pattern associated with low and medium flow resistance DPI devices (RS01L, RS01M, respectively) in subjects with PAH. Methods: This single center study enrolled subjects with PAH associated with connective tissue disease (aPAH, n=10) and idiopathic PAH (iPAH, n=10) to measure the following inhalation parameters: inspiratory effort (kPa), peak inspiratory flow rate (L/min), inhaled volume (L), and flow increase rate (L/s2) using the two devices. Results: On average, peak inspiratory flow rate was higher with RS01L vs. RS01M (84 ± 19.73 L/min vs. 70.47 ± 13.26 L/min; p=0.015). In the overall group, no differences between RS01L and RS01M were observed for inhaled volume, inspiratory effort, or flow increase rate. Inhaled volume with RS01L was higher in aPAH vs iPAH subjects: 1.67 ± 0.43L vs. 1.31 ± 0.26L; p=0.042. For the RS01L, inhaled volume correlated with forced expiratory volume in one second (r=0.460, p=0.030) and forced vital capacity (r=0.507, p=0.015). In subjects with aPAH using RSO1L, inspiratory effort was highly correlated with pulmonary vascular compliance (PVC) (r=0.903), and flow increase rate with PVC (r=0.906). For RSO1M, inspiratory effort was highly correlated with PVC (r=0.81). Conclusions: Use of RS01L and RS01M DPI devices allowed adequate inspiratory flow in PAH subjects. The correlation between flow increase rate and PVC in aPAH deserves further investigation.
Mechanisms underlying pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) remain elusive. Pulmonary arterial hypertension and exercise PH share similar physiologic consequences; it is debated whether they share biologic mechanisms and if exercise PH represents an early phase of pulmonary arterial hypertension. We conducted an observational study to test if there is a graded metabolic disturbance along the severity of PH, which may indicate shared or disparate pathophysiology. Individuals referred to an academic medical dyspnea center with unexplained exertional intolerance underwent invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing. We identified controls with no hemodynamic exercise limitation, individuals with exercise PH (mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) < 25 mmHg at rest but ≥ 30 mmHg during exercise without pulmonary venous hypertension) and pulmonary arterial hypertension (mPAP > 25 mmHg at rest without pulmonary venous hypertension) (n = 26 in each group). Unbiased metabolomics with chromatography mass spectrometry was performed on pulmonary arterial blood at rest and peak exercise. Random forest analysis and hierarchical clustering were used to quantify metabolite prediction of group membership and rank metabolites which were significantly different between groups. Compared to controls, pulmonary arterial hypertension subjects exhibited perturbations in pathways involving glycolysis, TCA cycle, fatty acid and complex lipid oxidation, collagen deposition and fibrosis, nucleotide metabolism, and others. The metabolic signature of exercise PH was uniquely between that of control and pulmonary arterial hypertension subjects. Accuracy predicting control, exercise PH, and pulmonary arterial hypertension group was 96%, 90%, and 88%, respectively, using paired rest-exercise metabolic changes. Our data suggest the metabolic profile of exercise PH is between that of controls and patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.
