Background To assess the impact of immediate versus delayed antihypertensive treatment on the outcome of older patients with isolated systolic hypertension, we extended the double-blind placebo-controlled Systolic Hypertension in Europe (Syst-Eur) trial by an open-label follow-up study lasting 4 years. Methods The Syst-Eur trial included 4695 randomized patients with minimum age of 60 years and an untreated blood pressure of 160–219 mmHg systolic and below 95 mmHg diastolic. The double-blind trial ended after a median follow-up of 2.0 years (range 1–97 months). Of 4409 patients still alive, 3517 received open-label treatment consisting of nitrendipine (10–40 mg daily) with the possible addition of enalapril (5–20 mg daily), hydrochlorothiazide (12.5–25 mg daily), or both add-on drugs. Non-participants (n = 892) were also followed up. Results Median follow-up increased to 6.1 years. Systolic pressure decreased to below 150 mmHg (target level) in 2628 participants (75.0%). During the 4-year open-label follow-up, stroke and cardiovascular complications occurred at similar frequencies in patients formerly randomized to placebo and those continuing active treatment. These rates were similar to those previously observed in the active-treatment group during the double-blind trial. Considering the total follow-up of 4695 randomized patients, immediate compared with delayed antihypertensive treatment reduced the occurrence of stroke and cardiovascular complications by 28% (P = 0.01) and 15% (P = 0.03), respectively, with a similar tendency for total mortality (13%, P = 0.09). In 492 diabetic patients, the corresponding estimates of long-term benefit (P< 0.02) were 60, 51 and 38%, respectively. Conclusions Antihypertensive treatment can achieve blood pressure control in most older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. Immediate compared with delayed treatment prevented 17 strokes or 25 major cardiovascular events per 1000 patients followed up for 6 years. These findings underscore the necessity of early treatment of isolated systolic hypertension.
Summary: In contrast to cyclic AMP-dependent positive inotropes, the calcium-sensitizer and partial phosphodiesterase (PDE) inhibitor pimobendan may induce beneficial effects in heart failure. However, its effect on relaxation, myocardial energetics and neurohormones are unknown. Twelve patients with heart failure, New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification II-III, due to ischemic cardiomyopathy, were studied for 1 h after they received 5 mg pimobendan intravenously (i.v.). Pimobendan progressively reduced systemic resistance and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) (22 and 50%, respectively) and improved isovolumetric contractility and relaxation parameters by 30% (all p < 0.05 vs. control). LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (LVEDV, LVESV) decreased significantly by 20 and 19%, respectively. Cardiac output (CO) increased by 17% due to a simultaneous increase in heart rate (HR) from 75 ± 3 to 86 ± 5 beats/min (mean ± SEM, p < 0.05). Pimobendan did not change coronary hemodynamics, but myocardial O2 extraction and consumption were decreased significantly by 18 and 20%, respectively. Catecholamines, angiotensin II (AII), and aldosterone levels did not change significantly. In contrast, arterial and coronary venous renin increased signifciantly from 57 ± 17 and 53 ± 14.7 μM/h at control to 69 ± 20 and 69 ± 20 μM/h, respectively, 60 min after pimobendan administration. Simultaneously, cardiac renin uptake at baseline (0.449 ± 0.185 μmol/min) changed to release (− 0.071 ± 0.145 μmol/min, p < 0.05). Serious side effects did not occur. Thus, pimobendan had progressive positive inotropic and lusitropic effects, diminished preload and afterload despite modest stimulation of plasma renin activity (PRA), and reduced systemic vascular resistance. Despite its clear positive inotropic and chronotropic properties, pimobendan still caused significant improvement of myocardial energetics and thus may be useful during acute exacerbations of heart failure caused by ischemic heart disease.
Adenosine is an endogenous nucleoside with potent vasodilatory capacities, released under ischaemic conditions in particular. Its mechanisms of action, however, remain elusive.To evaluate the role of adenosine, using a non-selective purinergic receptor antagonist, and the possible involvement of nitric oxide in this mechanism. In addition, the production of renin and catecholamines was studied during infusion of adenosine, caffeine, or both.Thirty-three hypertensive patients who underwent diagnostic renal angiography received intrarenal infusions of adenosine either alone or in combination with caffeine or the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, N-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA). The effects on renal blood flow (RBF) were assessed by the xenon-133 washout technique and both arterial and renal venous blood samples were taken for measurement of renin and catecholamine concentrations. Intra-arterial blood pressure and heart rate were monitored continuously.Adenosine induced a dose-dependent vasodilatation. Caffeine alone did not change RBF, but shifted the dose-response curve of adenosine to the right during concomitant infusion of caffeine. RBF during combined infusion of L-NMMA and adenosine was not different from that during adenosine alone, but the decrease in renal vascular resistance was less pronounced during this combination. Renin secretion did not change during the infusion of either adenosine alone or adenosine in combination with caffeine. Catecholamine concentrations also did not change during any of the experiments.Adenosine induces vasodilatation in the human hypertensive kidney and this effect is mediated by the adenosine receptor. Nitric oxide plays, at most, a minor part in the adenosine-induced vasodilatation. Furthermore, renin secretion is not affected by adenosine and caffeine.
In 1989, the European Working Party on High Blood Pressure in the Elderly started the double-blind, placebo-controlled, Systolic Hypertension in Europe Trial to test the hypothesis that antihypertensive drug treatment would reduce the incidence of fatal and nonfatal stroke in older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. This report addresses whether the benefit of antihypertensive treatment varied according to sex, previous cardiovascular complications, age, initial blood pressure (BP), and smoking or drinking habits in an intention-to-treat analysis and explores whether the morbidity and mortality results were consistent in a per-protocol analysis.
Methods
After stratification for center, sex, and cardiovascular complications, 4695 patients 60 years of age or older with a systolic BP of 160 to 219 mm Hg and diastolic BP less than 95 mm Hg were randomized. Active treatment consisted of nitrendipine (10-40 mg/d), with the possible addition of enalapril maleate (5-20 mg/d) and/or hydrochlorothiazide (12.5-25 mg/d), titrated or combined to reduce the sitting systolic BP by at least 20 mm Hg, to below 150 mm Hg. In the control group, matching placebo tablets were employed similarly.
Results
In the intention-to-treat analysis, male sex, previous cardiovascular complications, older age, higher systolic BP, and smoking at randomization were positively and independently correlated with cardiovascular risk. Furthermore, for total (P=.009) and cardiovascular (P=.09) mortality, the benefit of antihypertensive drug treatment weakened with advancing age; for total mortality (P=.05), the benefit increased with higher systolic BP at entry, while for fatal and nonfatal stroke (P=.01), it was most evident in nonsmokers (92.5% of all patients). In the per-protocol analysis, active treatment reduced total mortality by 24% (P=.05), reduced all fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular end points by 32% (P<.001), reduced all strokes by 44% (P=.004), reduced nonfatal strokes by 48% (P=.005), and reduced all cardiac end points, including sudden death, by 26% (P=.05).
Conclusions
In elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension, stepwise antihypertensive drug treatment, starting with the dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker nitrendipine, improves prognosis. The per-protocol analysis suggested that treating 1000 patients for 5 years would prevent 24 deaths, 54 major cardiovascular end points, 29 strokes, or 25 cardiac end points. The effects of antihypertensive drug treatment on total and cardiovascular mortality may be attenuated in very old patients.
It has been suggested that low diastolic blood pressure (BP) while receiving antihypertensive treatment (hereinafter called on-treatment BP) is harmful in older patients with systolic hypertension. We examined the association between on-treatment diastolic BP, mortality, and cardiovascular events in the prospective placebo-controlled Systolic Hypertension in Europe Trial.
Methods
Elderly patients with systolic hypertension were randomized into the double-blind first phase of the trial, after which all patients received active study drugs (phase 2). We assessed the relationship between outcome and on-treatment diastolic BP by use of multivariate Cox regression analysis during receipt of placebo (phase 1) and during active treatment (phases 1 and 2).
Results
Rates of noncardiovascular mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and cardiovascular events were 11.1, 12.0, and 29.4, respectively, per 1000 patient-years with active treatment (n = 2358) and 11.9, 12.6, and 39.0, respectively, with placebo (n = 2225). Noncardiovascular mortality, but not cardiovascular mortality, increased with low diastolic BP with active treatment (P < .005) and with placebo (P < .05); for example, hazard ratios for lower diastolic BP, that is, 65 to 60 mm Hg, were, respectively, 1.15 (95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.31) and 1.28 (95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.59). Low diastolic BP with active treatment was associated with increased risk of cardiovascular events, but only in patients with coronary heart disease at baseline (P < .02; hazard ratio for BP 65-60 mm Hg, 1.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.98-1.38).
Conclusions
These findings support the hypothesis that antihypertensive treatment can be intensified to prevent cardiovascular events when systolic BP is not under control in older patients with systolic hypertension, at least until diastolic BP reaches 55 mm Hg. However, a prudent approach is warranted in patients with concomitant coronary heart disease, in whom diastolic BP should probably not be lowered to less than 70 mm Hg.
To examine the contribution of six cardiovascular polymorphisms to the occurrence of a first event of ischemic heart disease (IHD) in a primary care population with a high prevalence of hypertension. Furthermore, we specified the data for sex and age.In this cross sectional case-control study, patients with a first event of IHD (157) and event-free controls (571) were studied. Both the groups were genotyped for the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (A1166C), angiotensinogen (M235 T), angiotensin converting enzyme (4656rpt), endothelial nitric oxide synthase (E298D), G-protein beta3 subunit (C825 T), and alpha-adducin (G460W) polymorphisms. Univariate and multivariate odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to assess the association between a first ischemic event and these polymorphisms. Sliding mean analyses were performed to show age-specific associations.Multivariate ORs indicated a protective association for the carrier status of the T-allele of AGT, overall [OR = 0.69 (0.34-0.90)] and for males [OR = 0.58 (0.27-0.89)]. Sliding mean analyses showed a continuous protective association with IHD of the T-allele of AGT with increasing age in males, whereas in females an increased risk for IHD was observed with a maximum OR of 1.6 at the age of 56 years.In this population the T-allele of the AGT polymorphism is protective for a first event of IHD in males.
Angiotensin II (AngII) increases insulin-mediated glucose uptake in healthy individuals. The underlying mechanisms are undefined. AngII may increase glucose uptake through a direct effect on muscle cell insulin signaling or through increasing insulin delivery to muscle cells through effects on the microvasculature.Our objective was to determine whether AngII increases insulin-mediated glucose uptake through effects on insulin-induced capillary recruitment.We examined the effects of AngII on hyperinsulinemia-induced capillary density by measuring skin capillary density, capillary recruitment, and capillary density during venous congestion in 18 healthy subjects in the basal state, during systemic hyperinsulinemia, and during hyperinsulinemia with coinfusion of AngII or phenylephrine (pressor control). In addition, whole-body glucose uptake and blood pressure were measured.Capillaroscopy data of 13 subjects were available for analysis. Compared with the basal state, hyperinsulinemia increased baseline capillary density (51.5+/-9.0 vs. 55.2+/-10.8 n/mm2, P<0.01), capillary recruitment (67.8+/-6.8 vs. 70.6+/-7.5 n/mm2, P<0.05), and capillary density during venous congestion (78.5+/-12.0 vs. 80.3+/-12.0 n/mm2, P<0.01). Infusion of AngII, but not phenylephrine, reduced insulin-induced capillary recruitment (69.3+/-8.6 vs. 65.2+/-8.0 n/mm2, P<0.05) and capillary density during venous congestion (79.7+/-15.3 vs. 73.9+/-12.1, P<0.05) while enhancing glucose uptake [2.40+/-0.7 vs. 2.68+/-0.6 (mg/kg.min per pmol/l)x100, P<0.01)] (n=18).AngII increases insulin-mediated glucose uptake in healthy individuals. This increase was probably not related to increases in microvascular perfusion because infusion of AngII during hyperinsulinemia reduced insulin-mediated skin capillary recruitment. Additional studies are needed to investigate whether AngII directly affects insulin delivery through increasing insulin transport across the microvasculature.
Circadian changes in blood pressure are paralleled by analogous circadian changes in plasma catecholamines: blood pressure, plasma noradrenaline and adrenaline fall at night.To determine whether adrenaline is a prerequisite for the nocturnal fall in blood pressure, the circadian blood pressure profile was studied in adrenalectomized subjects, lacking circulating adrenaline.Ten adrenalectomized subjects and 10 healthy age-matched normotensive controls underwent 24-h non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring with the Oxford Medilog device. Measurements were taken every 15 min from 7.00 a.m. until 11.59 p.m and every 30 min from 12 midnight until 6.59 a.m. The nocturnal blood pressure fall was calculated for each subject.Mean +/- SD systolic blood pressure decreased at night by 13.2 +/- 9.5 mmHg in the adrenalectomized and by 11.7 +/- 7.3 mmHg (NS) in the control subjects. There was no significant difference between groups in the nocturnal diastolic blood pressure fall (14.4 +/- 5.1 and 13.1 +/- 5.2 mmHg, respectively). Systolic blood pressure decreased by > 10 mmHg in five of the adrenalectomized and eight of the control subjects. Diastolic blood pressure decreased by > 10 mmHg in eight of the adrenalectomized and eight of the control subjects.The normal nocturnal fall in blood pressure in adrenalectomized subjects indicates that circulating adrenaline is not required for a normal circadian blood pressure rhythm.
Our website uses cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing to use our site, or clicking "Continue," you are agreeing to our Cookie Policy | Continue JAMA Internal Medicine HomeNew OnlineCurrent IssueFor Authors Podcast Publications JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry (1919-1959) JN Learning / CMESubscribeJobsInstitutions / LibrariansReprints & Permissions Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Accessibility Statement 2023 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved Search All JAMA JAMA Network Open JAMA Cardiology JAMA Dermatology JAMA Forum Archive JAMA Health Forum JAMA Internal Medicine JAMA Neurology JAMA Oncology JAMA Ophthalmology JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery JAMA Pediatrics JAMA Psychiatry JAMA Surgery Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry Input Search Term Sign In Individual Sign In Sign inCreate an Account Access through your institution Sign In Purchase Options: Buy this article Rent this article Subscribe to the JAMA Internal Medicine journal
