5575 Background: Women with PROC are a heterogeneous group with a median overall survival of 12 months. We hypothesised that QOL measures would be significant prognostic factors in PROC and improve predictions of survival based on clinical factors. Methods: Data from 333 participants in AURELIA, randomised phase 3 trial of chemotherapy +/- bevacizumab, was used to identify domains of QOL, measured at baseline with the EORTC QLQ-C30 & OV28, that were significantly associated with OS in Cox regression analyses. Cut-points were determined to categorise patients as low, medium and high risk groups. Multivariable analysis for categorised QOL domains significantly associated with OS was performed adjusting for established clinical prognostic factors. Cut-points were validated in an independent dataset, CARTAXHY, a randomised trial comparing different chemotherapies in PROC. Results: In AURELIA, physical functioning (PF), role, emotional, social, global health, and abdominal/gastrointestinal symptoms (AGS) scores were significantly associated with OS in univariable analyses. PF (P < 0.001) and AGS (P < 0.001) scores remained significant in multivariable models. When categorized into high (PF score < 67), medium (67-92), and low ( > 92) risks, mOS were 11.2, 14.7 and 19.3 months respectively (P < 0.001). These categories were applied in the CARTAXHY population (N = 136), and mOS were 7.9, 16.2 and 23.9 months (P < 0.001) respectively. For high (AGS score > 44), medium (13-44), and low ( < 13) risks, mOS were 11.9, 14.3, and 20.0 months in AURELIA (P < 0.001); and 10.5, 19.6, and 24.1 months in CARTAXHY (P = 0.001). PF (P = 0.048) and AGS (P = 0.011) remained independently significant prognostic factors after adjusting for performance status, ascites, CA125, platinum-free interval, primary platinum resistance, and size of measurable lesions. Conclusions: Self-ratings of physical functioning and abdominal/gastrointestinal symptom scores improved predictions of overall survival based on traditional clinical factors in PROC. This additional prognostic information could improve stratification in clinical trials, patient-doctor-communication about prognosis, and clinical decision-making. Clinical trial information: NCT00976911.
Abstract Background Smartphones are rapidly changing the way doctors capture and communicate clinical information, particularly in highly visual specialties such as dermatology. An understanding of how and why smartphones are currently used in clinical practice is critical in order to evaluate professional and legal risks, and to formulate policies that enable safe use of mobile technologies for the maximal benefit of practitioners and patients. Methods Australian dermatologists and dermatology trainees were surveyed on their current practices relating to clinical smartphone use. Results Of the 105 respondents, 101 provided useable results. The data show clinical smartphone use is common and frequent, with more than 50% of respondents sending and receiving images on their smartphones at least weekly. Clinical photographs were usually sent via multimedia message or email and were commonly stored on smartphones (46%). Security measures adopted to protect data were limited. There was inadequate documentation of consent for transmission of photographs and advice provided. Only 22% of respondents were aware of clear policies in their workplace regarding smartphone use, and a majority desired further education on digital image management. Conclusions Given the frequency of use and the degree of importance placed on the ability to send and receive clinical images, clinical smartphone use will persist and will likely increase over time. Current practices are insufficient to comply with professional and legal obligations, and increase practitioners’ vulnerability to civil and disciplinary proceedings. Further education, realistic policies and adequate software resources are critical to ensure protection of patients, practitioners and the reputation of the dermatological profession.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) accuracy after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) for breast cancer varies according to hormone receptor (HR), human epidermal growth factor receptor type-2 (HER2) subtype and Ki-67 proliferation index. Whether MRI accuracy varies by genomic signatures is unknown. We examined the accuracy of MRI in the NEONAB trial (Clinicaltrials.gov #: NCT01830244).To examine the accuracy of MRI to predict pathological response to neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer in the NEONAB trial.Patients with stages II-III breast cancer received sequential epirubicin, cyclophosphamide and nab-paclitaxel and trastuzumab if they were HER2+. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated to assess the utility of preoperative MRI to predict pathological complete response (pCR). Bland-Altman plots were used to assess agreement between MRI and pathological assessment of residual disease.MRI correctly predicted pCR in 64.1% of the cohort. Sensitivity and specificity were 52% and 78%, respectively; PPV 73% and NPV 58%. MRI predicted pCR most accurately in HER2-positive patients; sensitivity 58%, specificity 100%, PPV 100% and NPV 38%. MRI had higher PPV and NPV in tumours with Ki-67 ≥ 15% than tumours with Ki-67 < 15%, 75% versus 50% and 57.5% versus 50%, respectively. In this study, MRI underestimated residual tumour size by 1.65 mm (limits of agreement: 43.07-39.77 mm).MRI appears more accurate for predicting pCR in HER2+ disease than other subtypes and in cancers with Ki-67 ≥ 15% compared to those with Ki-67 < 15%. Accuracy of MRI in our HR+, RS ≥ 25 cohort is comparable to previous reports of unselected HR+ disease. MRI post-NST should be interpreted in conjunction with HER2 status and Ki-67 index of the primary.
1104 Background: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors can potentiate chemotherapy induced DNA damage, through synthetic lethality, leading to increased tumor death. We hypothesized that O+C would increase antitumor activity of O through increased DNA damage induced by C. This study ( ANZCTR N12613000924752) evaluated the safety and activity of O+C. Methods: Eligible patient (pts) had performance status 0-2, with ≤3 lines of therapy (including platinum for OVCA and anthracycline and taxane for BC). Pts received O+C with a dose escalations strategy using a 3+3 design with cohort expansions once maximal tolerated dose (MTD) was determined. Dose level 1 (DL1); O, 300 mg bid continuously, C, 50mg on days 1,3 and 5 weekly, 21 day cycle. Dose level 2 (DL2); O, 300 mg bid continuously, C, 50mg days 1-5 weekly 21 day cycle. Dose limiting toxicity was evaluated during 1st two cycles. Safety was assessed by CTCAEv4.0 and efficacy with RECISTv1.1 and GCIC criteria. Results: Of the 32 pts (median age 56, 9 had BC ( BRCA1 22%, BRCA2 44%) and 23 had HGSOC ( BRCA1 39%, BRCA2 26%). 4 pts were treated at DL1 and 28 pts at DL2. DL2 was the MTD. At the time of analysis, 16 of 29 pts had 8 cycles of O+C, with 14 of 16 pts continued with O beyond the 8 th cycle. One pt stopped because of adverse events (AEs) and the remaining 12 stopped due to disease progression. The median treatment duration of O+C was 4.3 months (0.7-23.5). Common AEs were nausea (Grade (Gr) 1/2: 88%, Gr 3: 3%), fatigue (Gr 1/2: 81%), constipation (Gr 1/2: 38%, Gr 3: 3%), and vomiting (Gr 1/2: 38%, Gr 3: 3 %). There were no grade (Gr) 4 or 5 AE. 50% required blood transfusion for anemia. Unconfirmed disease control rate (DCR) was 73% (N = 30; CR = 1, PR = 9, SD = 12). DCR for BC and HGSOC were 56% and 81% respectively. In the BRCA cohort (N = 19), DCR was 79%. GCIG CA125 response rates were 70% and 92% for all HGSOC and BRCA cohort respectively. Conclusions: In HGSOC and BC pts, the recommended phase II dose (O 300 mg bid continuously, C 50mg on days 1-5 weekly) is tolerable and active, particularly in those with germline BRCA mutation, supporting our hypothesis. A randomised phase II study in BRCA mutant HGSOC is planned. Clinical trial information: ACTRN12613000924752.
'/%3e%3c/defs%3e%3cpath fill='%23012169' d='M0 0h10080v5040H0z'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='.6' d='m0 0 6 3m0-3L0 3' clip-path='url(%23b)' transform='scale(840)'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23e4002b' stroke-width='.4' d='m0 0 6 3m0-3L0 3' clip-path='url(%23c)' transform='scale(840)'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23fff' stroke-width='840' d='M2520 0v2520M0 1260h5040'/%3e%3cpath stroke='%23e4002b' stroke-width='504' d='M2520 0v2520M0 1260h5040'/%3e%3cg fill='%23fff'%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23d' x='2520' y='3780'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' x='7560' y='4200'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' x='6300' y='2205'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' x='7560' y='840'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23a' x='8680' y='1869'/%3e%3cuse xlink:href='%23e' x='8064' y='2730'/%3e%3c/g%3e%3c/svg%3e)