Therapeutic strategies to deplete lymphocytes, especially regulatory T cells, in cancer patients have been proposed to increase the benefits of (immuno)chemotherapy. In this study, we explored the influence of temozolomide (TMZ) on different T-cell populations and addressed if the depletion of CD4+ T cells would be associated to the clinical benefits of TMZ. Patients were treated with TMZ (150 mg/m2 daily, every two weeks on a four-week schedule) until disease progression. Changes in T-lymphocyte subsets were characterized by flow cytometry. All patients enrolled in this study had histologically verified unresectable stage IV melanoma. Objective responses were induced in 12.5% of the patients, while 42.5% of them obtained short-term disease stabilization. The median progression-free survival (PFS) of this patient cohort was 8.7 mo. Lymphopenia (< 0.7 × 109 cells/L, grade 2) developed in 71% of the patients after 3 treatment cycles (~100 d). The development of grade 2 lymphopenia after the 3rd cycle of therapy positively correlated with clinical outcome (p = 0.01), and was linked, though non-significantly, to prolonged median PFS (303 vs. 200 d). In addition, significant changes in CD8+ T-cell subgroups were observed, notably a shift from naïve T cells toward more differentiated memory T cells. Finally, we demonstrated that specific CD8+ T-cell responses against selected tumor associated antigens (TAAs) were enhanced by the administration of TMZ (p = 0.04), while virus-specific T-cell responses were stable. Thus, immunological monitoring in the course of TMZ treatment might become an important tool for clinical guidance in the future.
Objectives: Effective management of adverse events (AEs) following vandetanib treatment is important to maximize clinical benefits. We examined whether more frequent contact with vandetanib-treated patients reduced AEs of CTCAE grade 2 or higher. Study Design: In this open-label, multicentre, phase III study, patients with locally advanced or metastatic medullary thyroid cancer were randomized to a patient outreach programme (outreach) or a standard AE monitoring schedule (vandetanib control) for 52 weeks. In addition to standard AE monitoring, patients in the outreach arm were contacted every 2 weeks by telephone/during their clinic visit for specific AE questioning related to diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, headache and rash. Patients received vandetanib at 200 or 300 mg/day, depending on the creatinine levels at screening. Results: Altogether, 205 patients were randomized (outreach, n = 103; vandetanib control, n = 102). This study did not meet its primary objective; the mean percentage of time patients experienced at least one AE of grade 2 or higher was higher for the outreach group (51.65%) than for the vandetanib control group (45.19%); the difference was not statistically significant (t statistic: 1.29; 95% CI -3.44 to 16.37%; p = 0.199). The most frequently reported AEs were diarrhoea (56.9% for the outreach group vs. 46.6% for the vandetanib controls), hypertension (36.3 vs. 31.1%), rash (25.5 vs. 24.3%) and nausea (25.5% vs. 18.4%), and the most frequently reported AEs of grade 2 or higher were hypertension (33.3 vs. 23.3%), diarrhoea (26.5 vs. 24.3%) and dermatitis acneiform (11.8 vs. 9.7%). Conclusions: Additional outreach to patients treated with vandetanib had no impact on the rate or severity of AEs compared to the standard AE monitoring schedule. AEs were consistent with the known safety profile of vandetanib.
It has been suggested that embryogenic properties of migratory cells are reactivated during wound healing and metastasis in adults. This might explain the association between wound-induced inflammation and poor survival in patients with ulcerated melanoma. Linking inflammation with a migratory phenotype, we characterize the infiltration of innate inflammatory cells, loss of cell-to-cell adhesion (E-cadherin), factors associated with extracellular matrix degradation [matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9), and neutrophil elastase (NE)], and spindle-shaped cell morphology, between ulcerated (n = 179) and nonulcerated (n = 206) melanoma. In addition, the presence of "extravascular migratory metastasis" (angiotropism) and tumor-vessel density were evaluated as important factors for tumor cell dispersal in ulcerated melanoma. We showed a correlation between expression of the granulocyte marker cd66b+ and the expression of NE and MMP-9, reflecting activated neutrophils. Ulcerated melanoma correlated with a low global E-cadherin score (P = 0.041) and weak-spot score (P = 0.0004). Thus, 28% of the nonulcerated, 42% of the minimally/moderately ulcerated melanoma, and 53% of the excessively ulcerated melanoma presented low scores as opposed to a high E-cadherin score. In addition, the presence of ulceration was correlated with angiotropism (P < 0.0001) and spindle-shaped morphology (P = 0.021). There were no differences in MMP-9 expression or intratumoral vessel density between the ulcerated and nonulcerated group. In conclusion, expression of migratory cell properties showed a highly heterogeneous pattern, which was associated with ulcerated areas and inflammatory cells, in general and with neutrophils in particular. We, therefore, suggest that wound-associated inflammation may be involved in the induction of migratory cell transition and tumor cell dispersal in ulcerated melanoma.
TPS9605 Background: Adjuvant (adj) immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) improves relapse free survival (RFS) in stage III melanoma patients (pts). However, preclinical and translational data suggest that neo-adjuvant (neoadj) treatment might be favorable due to broader immune activation. The phase 1b OpACIN study comparing neoadj to adj IPI plus NIVO demonstrated a high pathological response rate (pRR) of 78% complicated by 90% gr 3-4 immune-related adverse events (irAEs). The phase 2 OpACIN-neo trial tested safety and efficacy of three different schemes of neoadj IPI+NIVO and identified two cycles of IPI 1mg/kg + NIVO 3mg/kg as well tolerated (20% gr 3-4 irAEs), with a high pRR of 77%. In both trials, none of the pts with a pathologic response have relapsed after a median follow-up of 30 and 8.3 months. In stage IV melanoma, long-term benefit is observed in patients achieving CR with ICI, even after cessation of therapy. This raises the question of whether a therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) can be omitted when a deep pathologic response with neoadj IPI+NIVO is achieved. Methods: The aim of this international multi-center investigator-initiated phase 2 PRADO extension study is to confirm the pRR and toxicity of 2 cycles of neoadjuvant IPI 1mg/kg + NIVO 3mg/kg (the preferred OPACIN-neo regimen) and to test response-driven subsequent therapy i.e. omitting surgery and adjuvant ICI based on the pathological response. 100-110 pts with stage IIIB/C melanoma and a measurable lymph node (≥15mm according to RECIST 1.1) will receive two cycles of IPI 1mg/kg + NIVO 3mg/kg after marker placement into the largest lymph node metastasis. After six weeks, pts will undergo resection of the index lymph node. For pCR/near pCR, pts will not undergo TLND; For pPR, pts will undergo TLND; and for pNR, pts will undergo TLND and start adjuvant NIVO or targeted therapy +/- radiotherapy for 52 weeks. Primary endpoints are pRR of marked lymph node and RFS at 24 months. Baseline biopsies, blood samples (week 0, 6, 12) and faeces (week 0, 6) will be collected for translational research analyses. The first patient in this trial was included in October 2018; 22 patients have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT02977052.
On April 1, 2015, Odense University Hospital (OUH) began a new diagnostic strategy, wherein all malignant melanoma (MM) patients in the Region of Southern Denmark with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) underwent FDG-PET/CT preoperatively prior to lymph node dissection (LND). The purpose of this study is to determine FDG-PET/CT's efficacy in finding distant metastasis in the first year after the implementation of this new strategy, and to what extent these findings influence subsequent diagnostic testing and treatment in this patient group. We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study which included all patients with MM from all hospitals in the Region of Southern Denmark from April 1, 2015 to April 1, 2016 found to be SLNB-positive who subsequently underwent FDG-PET/CT. Patient information was acquired from the Danish Melanoma Database and was cross-referenced with OUH's patient records. The data was analyzed for a number of parameters including FDG-PET/CT findings and treatment strategy. Median follow-up time was 7 months.A total of 47 patients were eligible from the first year of this new diagnostic strategy. One patient was excluded due to undergoing LND prior to FDG-PET/CT. Thus, 46 patients were included in this study. Ultimately, preoperative FDG-PET/CT neither uncovered any distant metastases nor led to any alterations in treatment strategy in this patient group.Surprisingly, this new diagnostic strategy did not find any MM metastases or uncover anything else of relevance. FDG-PET/CT did, however, provide false positive findings in 13 % (6/46) of these patients. These scans triggered additional, predominantly invasive, procedures, which did not ultimately have an impact on the therapeutic strategy. Thus, these findings indicate a need for re-evaluation of this new diagnostic strategy as well as the necessity for further clinical trials evaluating FDG-PET/CT's utility in this clinical setting.
