Abstract A standardized multidisciplinary step‐by‐step approach to improve the compliance of young (or difficult) children having to undergo radiotherapy was described and applied. The procedure is called SIESTA, which stands for show‐imagination‐evaluation‐support‐treatment‐anesthesia. Preliminary assessments suggest that the SIESTA approach was effective: the rate of young patients (≤6 years) requiring anesthesia decreased from 27% (14/52 cases) in 2011‐2012 (before the procedure was adopted) to 13% (6/46) in 2018.
Abstract BACKGROUND Young patients with malignant brain tumors show neurocognitive alterations as both consequences of the tumor and of treatments received. A prospective study of longitudinal radiation damages after focal RT was activated in 2017. We present the first analysis correlating tumor localization, symptoms, neurological/endocrinological impairments, surgery/ies if adopted, and cognitive assessments at the time of enrollment. METHODS Sixty-six children eligible for focal RT were enrolled and underwent a neurocognitive assessment based on standardized tests (“impaired”/“non-impaired”). The database included demographical, clinical and pathological variables. The latter, together with MRI morphological scans, were used to define different kind of damage scores. The pattern of associations between clinical variables and damage scores was investigated. RESULTS Patients median age was 8 years; the most frequent tumor was Ependymoma (41%) and Posterior Fossa (29%) was the prevalent tumor site. All but 5 children (with Germ Cell Tumors), had undergone surgery and 32 had undergone chemotherapy before irradiation and evaluations. Ad-hoc scores of neurological deficits and endocrine alterations were created to characterize each patient. Moreover, structural abnormalities were quantified in a score for each cortical/subcortical region. Patients with posterior fossa Ependymomas and infratentorial tumors showed higher neurological damage scores. Endocrine alterations were more serious in supratentorial tumors, specifically in patients with Craniopharyngioma and Germ Cell tumors of the sellar region and ventricular system. Deficit scores were not associated to the presence of hydrocephalus and surgery, unlike endocrine alteration scores. The median number of child’s structural damaged areas was equal to 2 (IQR: 2-3). Tumor sites of patients with an impaired or non-impaired full-scale IQ or visual-perception index, was found to be different. CONCLUSIONS The analysis of baseline evaluations highlights damages preexisting to irradiations and generated by multiple factors. In light of these findings, damages over time could be better investigated by distinguishing multiple generating factors.
Extraosseous Ewing sarcoma is a rare entity and less is known about its clinical behavior and optimal treatment than for its counterpart in bone. This study is a retrospective analysis on a cohort of patients <21 years treated according to a "soft tissue sarcoma approach."The "extraosseous" origin of the tumor was established on radiological findings, based on the lack of any bone involvement. Patients were treated using a multimodality approach including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. All patients received chemotherapy with alkylating agents and anthracyclines for 25 weeks (nine courses). Radiotherapy (45-54.8 Gy) was required for all cases except those who had an initial R0 resection of tumors smaller than 5 cm.Fifty-seven patients (age 2-20 years, median 14) were treated from 1990 to 2020. Ten-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) were 77.5% and 85.5% in patients with localized disease, and 11.1% and 29.6% in those with metastatic disease (p < .001) (follow-up 5-349 months, median 107 months). In patients with localized disease, the most recent IVADo-IVE regimen achieved excellent survivals, that is, 10-year EFS 95.5%.Our study showed that satisfactory results were achieved in patients with localized extraosseous Ewing sarcoma treated with a tailored approach derived from soft tissue sarcoma protocols, which was less intensive and shorter as compared to the standards utilized for the management of bone Ewing sarcoma. Our study suggests that the extraskeletal site might be considered as a variable to stratify patients and modulate treatment intensity accordingly in Ewing sarcoma protocol.
Purpose To study a robust and reproducible procedure to investigate a relation between focal brain radiotherapy (RT) low doses, neurocognitive impairment and late White Matter and Gray Matter alterations, as shown by Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI), in children. Methods and materials Forty-five patients (23 males and 22 females, median age at RT 6.2 years, median age at evaluations 11.1 years) who had received focal RT for brain tumors were recruited for DTI exams and neurocognitive tests. Patients’ brains were parceled in 116 regions of interest (ROIs) using an available segmented atlas. After the development of an ad hoc, home-made, multimodal and highly deformable registration framework, we collected mean RT doses and DTI metrics values for each ROI. The pattern of association between cognitive scores or domains and dose or DTI values was assessed in each ROI through both considering and excluding ROIs with mean doses higher than 75% of the prescription. Subsequently, a preliminary threshold value of dose discriminating patients with and without neurocognitive impairment was selected for the most relevant associations. Results The workflow allowed us to identify 10 ROIs where RT dose and DTI metrics were significantly associated with cognitive tests results (p<0.05). In 5/10 ROIs, RT dose and cognitive tests were associated with p<0.01 and preliminary RT threshold dose values, implying a possible cognitive or neuropsychological damage, were calculated. The analysis of domains showed that the most involved one was the “school-related activities”. Conclusion This analysis, despite being conducted on a retrospective cohort of children, shows that the identification of critical brain structures and respective radiation dose thresholds is achievable by combining, with appropriate methodological tools, the large amount of data arising from different sources. This supported the design of a prospective study to gain stronger evidence.
