The purpose of this study was to obtain a set of correction factors of the radiophotoluminescent glass dosimeter (RGD) output for field size changes and wedge insertions.Several linear accelerators were used for irradiation of the RGDs. The field sizes were changed from 5 × 5 cm to 25 × 25 cm for 4, 6, 10, and 15 MV x-ray beams. The wedge angles were 15°, 30°, 45°, and 60°. In addition to physical wedge irradiation, nonphysical (dynamic/virtual) wedge irradiations were performed.The obtained data were fitted with a single line for each energy, and correction factors were determined. Compared with ionization chamber outputs, the RGD outputs gradually increased with increasing field size, because of the higher RGD response to scattered low-energy photons. The output increase was about 1% per 10 cm increase in field size, with a slight difference dependent on the beam energy. For both physical and nonphysical wedged beam irradiation, there were no systematic trends in the RGD outputs, such as monotonic increase or decrease depending on the wedge angle change if the authors consider the uncertainty, which is approximately 0.6% for each set of measured points. Therefore, no correction factor was needed for all inserted wedges. Based on this work, postal dose audits using RGDs for the nonreference condition were initiated in 2010. The postal dose audit results between 2010 and 2012 were analyzed. The mean difference between the measured and stated doses was within 0.5% for all fields with field sizes between 5 × 5 cm and 25 × 25 cm and with wedge angles from 15° to 60°. The standard deviations (SDs) of the difference distribution were within the estimated uncertainty (1SD) except for the 25 × 25 cm field size data, which were not reliable because of poor statistics (n = 16).A set of RGD output correction factors was determined for field size changes and wedge insertions. The results obtained from recent postal dose audits were analyzed, and the mean differences between the measured and stated doses were within 0.5% for every field size and wedge angle. The SDs of the distribution were within the estimated uncertainty, except for one condition that was not reliable because of poor statistics.
The broad-beam three-dimensional irradiation system under development at National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS) requires a small ridge filter to spread the initially monoenergetic heavy-ion beam to a small spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP). A large SOBP covering the target volume is then achieved by a superposition of differently weighted and displaced small SOBPs. Two approaches were studied for the definition of a suitable ridge filter and experimental verifications were performed. Both approaches show a good agreement between the calculated and measured dose and lead to a good homogeneity of the biological dose in the target. However, the ridge filter design that produces a Gaussian-shaped spectrum of the particle ranges was found to be more robust to small errors and uncertainties in the beam application. Furthermore, an optimization procedure for two fields was applied to compensate for the missing dose from the fragmentation tail for the case of a simple-geometry target. The optimized biological dose distributions show that a very good homogeneity is achievable in the target.
Field survey on output for X-ray therapeutic accelerators took place three times in Saitama Prefecture. The result of the field survey in 1997 showed the different rate from the designated dose at peak depth of 35 beams in 18 institutions. As different rate within +/-5% stood 91.4% in all beams, so different rate within +/-3% stood 85.7% in the same beams. The average different rate from the designated dose at peak depth was 11.06%. The standard deviation of the same condition was 3.72.The result of the field survey in 2005 showed the different rate from the designated dose at correction depth of 36 beams in 18 institutions. As different rate within +/-5% stood 100% in all beams, so different rate within +/-3% stood 91.6% in the same beams. The average different rate from the designated dose at correction depth was +0.80%. The standard deviation of the same condition was 1.46.We understood that the different rate from the designated dose at radiotherapeutic institutions decreased and even the value of the standard deviation was decreasing, by receiving 3 times of field surveys that was held in Saitama Pref. Also we understood that the beam numbers of different rate within +/-5% and the beam numbers of different rate within +/-3% were going up. We recognized that the good result of accurate dose is obtained more, by doing a continual field survey. The field survey was carried out in 2006 in Tochigi Prefecture and was the insufficient result in 10% of institutions.
OBJECTIVE:Since most radiation treatment plans are based on computed tomography (CT) images, which makes it difficult to define the targeted tumor volume located near a metal implant, this study aims to evaluate and compare three treatment plans in order to optimally reduce geometrical uncertainty in external radiation treatment of localized prostate cancer. METHODS:Experimental subjects were three prostate patients with bilateral hip prosthesis who had undergone radical radiotherapy. The treatment plans were five-field three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT), fixed 5-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using similar gantry angles, and single-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). The monitor units (MUs), dose volume histograms (DVHs), the dose indices of planning target volume (PTV), clinical target volume (CTV) and rectum were compared among the three techniques. The geometrical uncertainties were evaluated by shifting the iso-center (2– 10 mm in the anterior, posterior, left, right, superior, and inferior directions). The CTV and rectum dose indexes with and without the iso-center shifts were compared in each plan. RESULTS:The Conformity Index of PTV were 1.35 in 3D-CRT, 1.12 in IMRT, and 1.04 in VMAT, respectively. The rectum doses in 3D-CRT are also higher than those in IMRT and VMAT. The iso-center shift little affected the CTV dose when smaller than the margin size. The rectum dose increased especially after a posterior shift. Additionally, this dose increase was larger in the VMAT plan than in the 3D– CRT plan. However, the VMAT achieved a superior rectum DVH to that of 3D– CRT, and this effect clearly exceeded the rectum-dose increase elicited by the iso-center shift. CONCLUSION:For radiotherapy treatment of localized prostate cancer in patients with hip prosthesis, the dose distribution was better in the VMAT and Metal Artifact Reduction (MAR)–CT image methods than the conventional methods. Because the anatomical structure of the male pelvic region is relatively constant among individuals, we consider that VMAT is a valid treatment plan despite analyzing just three cases.
The most severe adverse event of radiotherapy in lung cancer is radiation pneumonitis (RP). Some indices commonly used to prevent RP are evaluated based on the anatomical lung volume. The irradiation dose may be more accurately assessed by using functional lung volume. We evaluated the usefulness of computed tomography (CT) incorporating functional ventilation images acquired by the inhalation of xenon (Xe) gas (Xe-CT functional images).Two plans were created for twelve patients: volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning using conventional chest CT images (anatomical plans) and VMAT planning using Xe-CT functional images (functional plans), and the dosimetric parameters were compared.Compared to the anatomical plans, the functional plans had significantly reduced V 20Gy in the high-functional lungs (p=0.005), but significant differences were not seen in the moderate-functional and low-functional lungs.The incorporation of Xe-CT functional images into VMAT plans enables radiotherapy planning with consideration of lung function.
A scheme for spot scanning using 11 C beams has been developed in order to form and verify a three-dimensionally conformal irradiation field for cancer radiotherapy. By selecting the momentum spread of a 11 C beam, we could considerably decrease the distal falloff of the irradiation field, thus conserving the beam quality. To estimate and optimize the dose distribution in the irradiation field, it is essential to evaluate the precise dose distribution of spot beams. The coupling of the lateral dose and depth-dose distributions originating from a wide momentum spread should be taken into account to calculate the dose distribution of 11 C beams. The reconstructed dose distribution of the irradiation field was in good agreement with the experimental results, i.e., within ±0.2%. An irradiation field of 35×35×43 mm 3 was optimized and spot scanning using 11 C beams was carried out. The flatness was within ±2.3% with an error of 1% in the detector resolution.
