Objective: To evaluate the migration of low-placental implantation (LPI) during the third trimester of pregnancy and its effect on delivery and post-partum hemorrhage.Methods: We conducted a retrospective study at a level 3 maternity center including all cases of placenta previa (PP) and LPI between 1998 and 2014. The distance (d) between cervical internal os (CIO) and placental edge (PE) were measured by vaginal ultrasonography in the third trimester of pregnancy at 32 and 3 weeks after. We analyzed CIO-PE distance, volume of post-partum hemorrhage, delivery decision, and mode of delivery using Kruskall–Wallis test.Results: In total, 319 patients presented with PP or LPI. All complete PP (121) and 90.6% (58 of 64) of the placentas less than 1 cm from the CIO did not migrate. Among the 138 placentas with an initial CIO-PE d greater than 1 cm, only 17 (12.3%) did not migrate above 2 cm. The patients for whom the decision to perform a cesarean section (C-section) was retained and realized had a CIO-PE d significantly lower than those who delivered vaginally (p < .001). The patients who delivered by C-section had a lower CIO-PE d when an emergency C-section was performed, specifically for hemorrhage (p < .001). The mean volume of hemorrhage was significantly higher for patients with a CIO-PE d less than 2 cm.Conclusion: Complete PP and the majority of the placentas less than 1 cm from the CIO did not migrate. Above 1 cm, the majority of the placentas migrated three to four weeks later. For the placentas less than 1 cm from the CIO, a significant risk of hemorrhage at delivery was observed. Thus, prophylactic cesarean section is required for CIO-PE distances <1 cm. For distances between 1 and 2 cm, the volume of blood loss tends to be more important than for distances >3 cm without statistical significance. A vaginal delivery could be tried after information of patients.
The European Trauma Course (ETC) exemplifies an innovative approach to multispecialty trauma education. This initiative was started as a collaborative effort among the European Society for Emergency Medicine, the European Society for Trauma and Emergency Surgery, and the European Society of Anaesthesiology under the auspices of the European Resuscitation Council. With the robust support of these societies, the project has evolved into the independent European Trauma Course Organisation. Over the past 15 years, the ETC has transcended traditional training by integrating team dynamics and non-technical skills into a scenario-based simulation course, helping to shape trauma care practice and education. A distinctive feature of the ETC is its training of doctors and allied healthcare professionals, fostering a collaborative and holistic approach to trauma care. The ETC stands out for its unique team-teaching approach, which has gained widespread recognition as the standard for in-hospital trauma care training not only in Europe but also beyond. Since its inception ETC has expanded geographically from Finland to Sudan and from Brazil to the Emirates, training nearly 20,000 healthcare professionals and shaping trauma care practice and education across 25 countries. Experiencing exponential growth, the ETC continues to evolve, reflecting its unmet demand in trauma team education. This review examines the evolution of the ETC, its innovative team-teaching methodology, national implementation strategies, current status, and future challenges. It highlights its impact on trauma care, team training, and the effect on other life support courses in various countries.
