The Difficult Task of Finding the Best Antihypertensive Agent: Comment on "Antihypertensive Treatment and Development of Heart Failure in Hypertension"
Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction represents a frequent clinical condition and is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Diastolic dysfunction is the most common cause of HF-PSF (heart failure with preserved ejection fraction). Therefore it becomes important to understand the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying diastolic dysfunction, as well as the effective therapeutic strategies able to antagonize its development and progression. Among the complex pathophysiological factors that may contribute to the development of diastolic dysfunction, the RAAS (renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system) has been shown to play a significant role. Paracrine and autocrine signals of the RAAS promote structural and functional changes in the heart largely linked to increased myocardial fibrosis. Enhanced and dysregulated activity of the RAAS also contributes to the development of volume overload and vasoconstriction with subsequent increases in left ventricular diastolic filling pressures and a higher susceptibility of developing CHF (congestive heart failure). More recently, it has also been suggested that the RAAS may play a role in triggering myocardial and vascular inflammation through the activation of different cell types and the secretion of cytokines and chemokines. RAAS-induced myocardial inflammation leads to perivascular myocardial fibrosis and to the development or progression of diastolic dysfunction. For these reasons pharmacological blockade of the RAAS has been proposed as a rational approach for the treatment of diastolic dysfunction. In fact, ACEIs (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors), ARBs (angiotensin II receptor blockers) and AAs (aldosterone antagonists) have been demonstrated to delay the development and progression from pre-clinical diastolic dysfunction towards CHF, as well as to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with this condition.
The trans-venous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (TV-ICD) is effective in treating life-threatening ventricular arrhythmia and reduces mortality in high-risk patients. However, there are significant short- and long-term complications that are associated with intravascular leads. These shortcomings are mostly relevant in young patients with long life expectancy and low risk of death from non-arrhythmic causes. Drawbacks of trans-venous leads recently led to the development of the entirely subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD). The S-ICD does not require vascular access or permanent intravascular defibrillation leads. Therefore, it is expected to overcome many complications associated with conventional ICDs. This review highlights data on safety and efficacy of the S-ICD and is envisioned to help in identifying the role of this device in clinical practice.
Aims Occurrence of heart failure during dialysis treatment is associated with high mortality. However, mechanisms underlying left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) in these patients are still elusive. In patients undergoing haemodialysis, arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is associated with right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) and a further impairment is observed when AVF is brachial rather than radial. However, it is not known whether AVF-induced RVD is associated with an impaired left ventricular function. We studied the relation between right and left ventricular function in 120 patients undergoing either haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis and 100 healthy age-matched controls. Methods Echocardiography including tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) was performed for both ventricles. Average myocardial performance index (MPI) of the right ventricle (RV MPI) was obtained with a multisegmental approach by using TDI. Results RVD was higher in haemodialysis than peritoneal dialysis patients and a further increase was observed in haemodialysis patients with brachial access. Interestingly, RV MPI inversely correlated with indices of both left ventricular contraction and relaxation and the association was even stronger in haemodialysis patients, particularly in those with brachial AVF. Of note, dialysis patients in the upper tertile of RV MPI showed the larger impairment of left ventricular function. Regression analyses showed that RV MPI was independently associated with reduced left ventricular function. By contrast, LVD did not significantly affect right ventricular performance in this setting. Conclusion AVF-induced RVD may contribute to LVD in dialysis patients. AVF plays a pivotal role in triggering LVD via right-to-left ventricular interdependence.
While most patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) show a relatively stable morphologic and clinical phenotype, in some others, progressive changes in the left ventricular (LV) wall thickness, cavity size, and function, defined, overall, as "LV remodeling", may occur. The interplay of multiple pathophysiologic mechanisms, from genetic background to myocardial ischemia and fibrosis, is implicated in this process. Different patterns of LV remodeling have been recognized and are associated with a specific impact on the clinical course and management of the disease. These findings underline the need for and the importance of serial multimodal clinical and instrumental evaluations to identify and further characterize the LV remodeling phenomenon. A more complete definition of the stages of the disease may present a chance to improve the management of HCM patients.
Arterial hypertension is an hard cardiovascular risk factor, being responsible for an high occurrence of cardiovascular adverse events such as myocardial infarction, stroke and congestive heart failure. However, hypertension rarely is the only contributor to such events since in most of cases the presence of elevated blood pressure values is associated with other conditions, particularly obesity, hypercholesterolemia, atherogenic dyslipidemia and diabetes mellitus. The presence of these conditions sensibly increases the level of risk, thus leading to an high morbidity and mortality. Indeed, most of adverse events related to hypertension are observed in patients with a mild increase of blood pressure levels suggesting that the concomitant presence of other risk factors significantly contributes to the overall risk. Moreover, it has been shown that untreated hypertension produces preclinical damages on cardiovascular system (heart, kidneys, vessels), further increasing the global risk. Indeed, left ventricular hypertrophy, microalbuminuria and vascular alterations are all independent predictors of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Based on these considerations, the current European hypertension guidelines are now drawing the attention to the concept of a global approach to cardiovascular risk in the management of hypertension. In fact, this strategy can lead to a better risk stratification of hypertensives based on the integrated evaluation of their risk factors, thus guiding the physicians to the choice of the most suitable therapeutic strategy to reduce the global cardiovascular risk of these patients. Keywords: Hypertension, cardiovascular disease, global approach, risk management